INTRODUCTION

It is no sentiment of either hostility or ill-will which has dictated these pages. Ill-will we feel for none. Whatever be the errors or faults of those who profess Christ and His doctrine, the thought of Jesus Himself awakes in us only feelings of profound respect and sincere admiration. Educated in the Christian religion, we know well all that it contains of poetry and grandeur. If we have abandoned the dominions of the catholic faith for those of the philosophy of spiritualism, we have not, on that account, forgotten the influences of our childhood, the flower-decked altar before which our young head was bowed, the grand harmony of the organ, the deep and solemn chants, the dim light filtering through the stained glass windows, and quivering above the faithful prostrated on the bare, cold stones. We have not forgotten that the ancient cross throws its shadow over the graves of those we have best loved on earth. If there is for us one image revered and sacred above all others, it is that of the victim of Calvary, of the martyr nailed to the tree of infamy, and who, wounded, crowned with thorns and dying, forgave His tormentors.

Even today we cannot hear unmoved the far-off call of the church-bells, whose brazen tones ring out and waken the echoes of the woods and vales. And in hours of sadness, we love to meditate in the silent and solitary church, under the penetrating influence there accumulated by the prayers, the aspirations, and the tears of so many generations.

But a question forces itself on us, a question which has been answered by many, through thought and study. All this paraphernalia, which appeals to the sense and touches the heart, all these manifestations of art, the pomp of the Roman Rite and the glamour of the ceremonial, are they not as a glittering veil which hides the poverty of idea and the unsufficiency of teaching? Is it not the knowledge of her powerlessness to satisfy the high faculties of the soul, intelligence, judgement, and reason, that has forced the Church into these material and external manifestations?
   
Protestantism, at least, is more sober. If it disdains outward forms and scenic effects, it is to bring out more clearly the grandeur of the idea. It establishes the sole authority of conscience and teaches a spiritual worship, and step by step, from conclusion to conclusion, arrives logically at unfettered examination, that is to say, philosophy.

We know how much that is sublime is contained in the doctrine of Christ; we know that it is, above all, the doctrine of love, the religion of pity, of mercy, and of fraternity among men. But is it the doctrine of Jesus which is taught by the Church? Do the words of the Nazarene come to us pure and untainted, and is the interpretation given us by the Church free from all prarasitical and all foreign element?

There is no question more serious, more worthy of the attention of thinkers and of all those who love and search for truth. It is this which we propose to make the subject of our enquiry in the first part of this book, avoiding all that could unsettle conscience, stir up evil passions, or promote strife among men.

This task, it is true, has been undertaken by others before us. But their object, their means of investigation and of proof differed from ours. They have studied less how to build up than to destroy, whereas we have primarily set before us the work of reconstruction and synthesis. We have endeavoured to extricate from the shadow of the ages, from the confusion of facts and of texts the central living thought, which is the pure source, the vital and radiant germ of Christianity, and at the same time, to offer an explanation of the strange phenomena which characterised its origins, phenomena which at any time may be, and indeed are being renewed every day, under our eyes, and which can be explained by natural laws. In these same phenomena until now unexplained, to which science has at length turned her attention, we find the solution of problems for so many centuries beyond the reach of human reason: the knowledge of our true nature and the law of our growing destinies.

One of the most powerful objections addressed by modern criticism to Christianity, is that its moral teaching and its doctrine of immortality, rest only on a collection of facts, so-called "miraculous," which man, enlightened as to the action of the laws of nature, cannot to-day admit. If miracles, they add, were necessary in olden times to induce a belief in a hereafter, are they any less so at this present time of doubt and incredulity? And besides, to what cause are these miracles to be attributed? It cannot be, as some would have it, to the divine nature of Christ, since His disciples performed them also.

A powerful light will be thrown on the question, and the assertions of Christianity concerning immortality will gain both in force and authority, if it is possible to prove that these so-called "miraculous" facts have been produced in all ages, particularly in our own, that they are the result of free, invisible and constantly acting causes, subject to immutable laws; if, in a word, we see in them, not miracles, but natural phenomena, a form of evolution and of the survival of our being after death.

That is precisely one of the consequences of Spiritualism. A profound study of the after-death manifestations shows us that they have taken place at all times, whenever persecutions did not obstruct them too violently; that nearly all the great missionaries, the founders of sects and relitions have been inspired mediuns; that a permanent communion exists, and unites the two humanities, that of this earth and that of space.


These facts are reproducing themselves around us with renewed intensity. For the last fifty years, forms have appeared, voices made themselves heard, messages have come to us by raps or by incorporation as well as by automatic writing. Proofs of identity coming in great number revealed to us the presence of those near to us, of those we have loved on earth, who have been of our own flesh and blood and from whom death had temporarily separated us. By their communications, their teachings, we learn something of that mysterious hereafter, the object of so many dreams, disputes and contradictions. The conditions of this future life become more clearer to our understanding. The darkness which reigned over these questions melts away. The past and the future are illuminated to their uttermost depths.


Thus Spiritualism brings us the natural and tangible proofs of immortality, and thereby carries us back to the pure Christian doctrines, to the very foundation of the Gospel, which Catholicism with its ever-multiplying dogmas, has buried under a mass of varied and foreign elements. By its scrupulous and searching study of the fluidic body, or perispirit, it renders more comprehensible, more acceptable, the phenomena of apparitions and of materialisations on which the Christian Faith entirely rests.

These considerations show the importance of the problems treated of in these pages and of which we offer the solution, basing our conclusions on the attestations of impartial and enlightened men of science, as well as on the result of our personal experiences, closely followed for a period of more than thirty years.

From this point of view, the seasonableness of this work will be denied by none. Never has the need of light on the vital questions with which the fate of society is so closely connected been more keenly felt. Tired of obscure dogmas, of interested theories, of affirmations without proof, the human mind has long since given way to doubt. An inexorable criticism has sifted all systems. Faith has been dried up at its source, the religious ideal has been veiled. At the same time, the high philosophic doctrines have lost their prestige. Man has forgotten at once the way to the temples of religion and the porticoes of wisdom.


To any attentive observer, the times we live in are full of menace. Our civilisation appears brilliant, but by how many stains is it not tarnished? Comfort and riches have become wide-spread, but is it in proportion to its riches that society becomes truly great? Is a sensual and luxurious life the object of man's existence? No! A people only becomes great, only elevates itself, by work, by a love of truth and of justice.

What has become of the civilisations of the past, of those occupied only with the body, its needs and its fancies? They are in ruins, they are dead.

We find again in our time precisely the same dangerous tendencies that wrecked them. They consist in giving undue importance to the material life, in putting before us as our chief aim the conquest of physical enjoyments. Maaterialistic science has narrowed the horizons of life. It has added to its sadness that of systematic negation and despairing ideas of nothingness. And thereby human misery has been aggravated, man has lost, along with his surest moral weapons, the sense of his responsibilities. The very foundations of his being have been shaken. Thus, little by little, characters are weakened, venality increased, immorality spreads itself like an immense plague-spot. What was once only suffering becomes despair. Cases of suicide are increasing in proportions hitherto unknown; and, monstrous fact, never seen in other ages, even children fall victims to this curse of the century.


Against these doctrines of negation and of death, facts themselves speak to-day. A methodical and prolonged investigation brings us this certitude; the human being survives his death, and his fate is the result of his works.

Facts are multiplying themselves endlessly, throwing new light on the nature of life and the non-interrupted evolution of our being. These facts are duly ascertained by science. It now remains to interpret them, to bring them into general view, and especially to understand the laws, the consequences and all that results therefrom concerning our individual and social life.


These facts will revive in us forgotten truths, and give back to man hope,  along with the high ideal which elevates and strengthens. By proving that there is a part of us which does not die, they direct our thoughts and hearts towards those future lives in which justice will find its accomplishment.

Thus all will understand that existence has an object, that moral law is a reality and has a sanction; that there is no useless suffering, no profitless work, no trial withou compensation, but that all is weighed in the balance of the Divine Judge.


Instead of this battlefield of life on which the weak must surely fall, in place of this blind and gigantic world-machine, which crushes out lives, and of which the negative philosophies tell us so much, the New Spiritualism will show to those who seek and suffer the grand vision of a world of equity, of justice and of love, where all is regulated with order, wisdom and harmony.

And thereby suffering will be lightened, the progress of man assured, his work sanctified, and life will take on dignity and grandeur.


For man needs a faith as much as a country and a home. That explains why so many forms of religion, superannuated and moss-grown, still have their partisans. There are in the human heart tendecies and needs that no negative system will ever be able to meet. In spite of its haunting doubt, when the soul suffers, it instinctively turns heavenward. Try as he will to avoid it, man finds the thought of God everywhere in his dradle-songs and in his childhood dreams. There are moments when hthe most hardened sceptic cannot contemplate the starry infinity, the race of the millions of suns rolling ever on through space, nor come in contact with death without respect and emotion.

Above all vain polemics and sterile disputes, there is something that is unaffected by criticism, it is this aspiration of the human soul toward an eternal Ideal which upholds it in its struggles, comforts it in its trials, inspires it in the hour of great resolutions. It is this intuition which tells us that, behind the stage on which life's dramas are played, and the grand spectacle of nature presents itself, there lies hidden a Power, a supreme Cause, which regulates the sucessive phases and traces the great lines of Evolution.

But when will man find the sure path which will bring him to God? Whence will he draw the strong conviction that will guide him, stage by stage, through time and space, towards the final aim of existence? In a word, what will be the faith of the future?

The material and transitory forms of religions pass, but the religious idea, the pure belief, freed from all inferior forms, is indestructible in its essence. The religious ideal will evolve, like all manifestations of thought. It cannot escape the law of progress which governs all creatures and things.

The faith of the future, which is already rising out of the shadow will be neither Catholic nor Protestant; it will be the universal faith of souls, reigning over all the advance societies of space, and through which will cease the antagonism which at present separates science from religion.

For, by and by, science will become religious, and religion scientific. It will be founded on observation, on impartial experiment, and on facts thousands of times repeated. By showing us the objective realities of the spirit world, it will dissolve our doubts, and remove our uncertainties; it will open to us infinite perspectives of the future.

At certain periods of history currents of ideas pass through the world, rousing humanity from its torpor. A breath from above starts a great mental wave, and truths long buried in the night of ages awake and come forth.

They rise from the depths where slumber the treasures of hidden forces, where are combined the elements of renovation, where the divine and mysterious works is elaborated. They manifest themselves under unexpected forms, they reappear and live again. At first they are misunderstood and ridiculed by the people, but they pursue their way unconcerned serene. And a day comes when it has to be recognised that these despised truths indeed come to offer the bread of life, the cup of hope, to all suffering and bleeding souls, that they bring us a new basis of teaching and perhaps also a further means of regeneration.

Such is the position of modern Spiritualism in which are born again so many long forgotten truths. It resumes in itself the beliefs of the sages and the ancient Initiates, the faith of the early Christians and our forefathers the Celts; it reappears under a more powerful form to direct a new and higher stage of the march of humanity.

CHAPTER I

THE ORIGIN OF THE GOSPELS

For about a century past, considerable research has been undertaken in different Christian countries, by men occupying the highest positions in the Churches and in the Universities, and they have been thus enabled to reconstitute the evolution of the Gospel traditions in their successive phases. It is especially in the Protestant religious centres that this work has been carried on, these researches so remarkable for their erudition and their minute character, which have thrown such bright light on the origin of Christianity, on the foundation, the form and the social importance of the doctrines of the Gospel.¹

It is the result of these researches that we shall endeavour to present here, in a brief and suitable form.

Christ wrote nothing. His words, dropped by the wayside, were passed on by word of mouth from one to another, and finally written down at different periods long after His death. A religious tradition formed itself gradually, which passed through a constant evolution until the fourth century.

During this period of three hundred years, Christian tradition never remained stationary, and the further it got from its starting point, passing through different times and places, the more it became enriched and diversified. A strenuous investigation took place, and, according to the forms taken by the various Gospel narratives, according to their Hewbrew or Greek origin, it was possible to establish with certainty the order in which this tradition developed, to fix the date and value of the documents which represent it.

For nearly half a century after the death of Jesus, the oral and living Christian tradition was like a running stream, from which all could draw freely. It was propagated by preaching, by the teachings of the Apostles, all of them, except Paul, simple, uneducated men, but it was illuminated by the thought of the Master.

It was only between the years A.D. 60 and 80 that the first written accounts appeared, first that of Mark, which is the oldest, then the first recitals attributed to Mathew and Luke, each of them fragmentary and increased by sucessive additions, like all popular works. It is in consequence of the difficulty experienced by the Church in tracing the real authors of the Gospels that the formula was adopted "Gospel according to. ..." It was only towards the end of the first century, between the years 80 and 98 that the Gospel of Luke was born, also that of Mathew (the first one which is now lost), and lastly, about 98 or 100, appeared at Ephesus, the Gospel of John.

Along with these Gospels, the only ones since recognised by the Church, a great number of others saw the light. We know now of twenty, but in the third century, Origen cites a far greater number. Luke alludes to them in the first verse of the work which bears his name.

For what reason were these numerous documents declared apocryphal and rejected? Very probably because they had become awkward for those who, during the second and third centuries, had imposed on Christianity a direction which was to lead it further and further from its primitive forms, and after having rejected a thousand religious systems, so-called heresies, was to end in the creation of three great religious in which the thought of Christ lies hidden, buried under dogmas and practices, as in a tomb. ²

The first Apostles contented themselves with teaching the Fatherhood of God and human brotherhood. They showed the necessity of penitence, namely, the reparation of our faults. This purification was symbolised by baptism, a practice adopted by the Essenes, who were the initiators of Jesus, and from whom the apostles also borrowed the belief in immortality and resurrection, that is to say, the return of the soul to the life of spirit and of space.

These morals and teachings drew many proselytes around the disciples of Christ, for there was nothing which did not harmonise with certain Jewish doctrines preached in the temple and the synagogues.

With and after Paul, new currents were established, and a number of confused doctrines began to appear among the Christian communities. Successively, the doctrines of grace, the divinity of Christ, the fall and the redemption, the belief in Satan and in hell, were added to and disturbed the purity and simplicity of the teachings of the Son of Mary.

This state of things became worse, and was accompanied by political and social convulsions which agitated the infancy of the Christian world.

The first Gospels carry us back to the troubled times in which Judea, in revolt against the Romans, witnessed the ruin of Jerusalem and the scattering of the Jewish people (in the year 70). They were written in the midst of tears and blood, and the hopes which they express seem to spring from an abyss of woe in which these saddened souls were awakening to a new ideal, an aspiration towards a better world, called the "Kingdom of Heaven", in which all wrongs would be set right.

At that time, all the Apostles, except John and Philip were dead, and the bond which united the Christians was as yet a very febble one. They formed isolated groups, and bore the name of Churches ("ecclesia," assemblies), each one directed by a bishop or superintendent appointed by election.


Each church followed its own inspiration; it only had as guide an uncertain tradition, noted down in a few manuscripts, and which resumed more or less accurately the acts and teachings of Jesus, which each beshop interpreted to suit himself.

If we add to these already great difficulties, those arising from the fragility of the parchments, at a time when printing was unknown, the want of intelligence of certain copyists, and all the troubles arising from the utter absence of supervision and control, we shall easily understand that unity of doctrine and of faith could not exist in such troubled times.

The three synoptic Gospels (Mark, Luke and Matthew) are strongly impregnated with the Judai Christianity of the Apostles, but the Gospel according to John begins to show another influence. We find there a reflection of the Greek philosophy, rejuvenated by the doctrines of the school of Alexandria.

Towards the end of the first century, the disciples of the great Greek philosophers had opened schools in all the most important Eastern cities. The Christians came into contact with them, and frequent discussions would arise between the partisans of the two doctrines. The Christians, recruited from among the lower ranks of the population, were for the most part little educated and ill prepared to sustain such arguments. On the other hand, the Greek thinkers were struck by the grandeur and moral elevation of Christianity. From this arose an interpretation of their doctrines, which showed itself in many points. Budding Christianity felt little by little the Greek influence which led it to make of Christ, the Word, the Logos, of Plato.


¹ A "resume" of these researches will be found in the "Encyclopedia of Religious Sciences," by F. Lichtenberger, Dean of the Protestant Theological Faculty of Paris. The "History of the Christian Theology in the Apostolic Century," by E. Reuss, Professor of Theology, in Strasburg, may also be recommended to those specially interested in the subject.

²
See Notes 2, 3 and 4 at the end of the book.

CHAPTER II

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE GOSPELS

 
In far off times, long before the coming of Christ, the word of the prophets prepared man for the deeper teachings of the Gospel. But, already distorted during the centuries before Christ, the Old Testament gave a very faint indication of the higher truths.¹

"The eternal truths which are God's thoughts" we are told by an eminent Individuality in space, have been communicated to the world at all times and in all places, and fitted for all comprehensions with fatherly goodness. But man has often misunderstood  and neglected them. Disdaining the high principles taught, carried away by his passions, he has passed by these great things without seeing them. This indifference to moral beauty is a cause of decay and corruption, and would drive nations to their ruin, if the hand of adversity and the great commotions of history, by profoundly shaking the souls of men, did not lead them back to truth.

Jesus came, a powerful Spirit and divine missionary, an inspired medium. He came, incarnating Himself, among the humble of this earth, so as to give an example of a simple and yet grand life, a life of abnegation and of sacrifice, which was to leave on earth uneffaceable traces.

The great figure of Jesus surpass all the conceptions of thought, therefore it cannot have been created by the imagination. In His soul, celestially serene, we see no blot, no shadow. All-perfection creates such a perfect harmony, that it appears to us as our ideal realised. His doctrine, full of love and light, is especially addressed to the poor and humble, to those men and women of the people, crushed under the weight of matter, who await in suffering and trial the words of life which are to comfort and raise them.

And this word of life comes to them with such penetrating sweetness, bringing with it such faith and joy, that it dispels all their doubts and draws them to Christ.

What Jesus meant by "preaching the kingdom of Heaven" to the humble, was making intelligible to all the knowledge of immortality and of the Universal Father, the Father whose voice is heard in the heart and conscience.

Little by little, this doctrine, verbally transmitted in the early times of Christianity, became changed and complicated under the influence of the contrary currents which agitated Christian Society.

The Apostles, chosen by Jesus to continue His mission, had been able to grasp His meaning, having received the impulse of His will and faith. But their knowledge was limited, and they were only able to preserve piously and lovingly the traditions, the high moral thoughts and the desire for regeneration which had been implanted in them.

In their journeying through the world, the apostles contented themselves with creating, in town after town, groups of Christian to whom they revealed the essential principles of their faith, and then hastily moved on, to carry the "good news" to other countries.

The Gospels, written in the midst of the convulsions of the death-struggle of the Jewish nation, as well as under the influence of the many controversies of early Christians times, show the traces of the passions and prejudices of the period, and of their reaction on the minds of men. Each group of "the faithful", each community, had its own Gospels, which differed more or less from those of others. ²

Great dogmatic quarrels agitated the Christian world and brought about bloody struggles in the Empire, until Theodosius, by giving supremacy to the Papacy, imposed on Christianity the opinion of the bishop of Rome. From that moment, individual thought, creating many diverse systems, was as much as possible suppressed.

So as to put a stop to the diversity of views, at the time when several Council had been discussing the nature of Jesus, some admitting, some denying His divinity, Pope Damasius confided to St Jerome in 384 the task of drawing up a Latin translation of the Old and New Testaments, which translation was henceforward to be considered as the only orthodox one and to regulate doctrines of the Church. It was what was called the "Vulgate".

This work was one of great difficulty. St Jerome, by his own account, finding himself confronted by as many different versions as there were copies of the Gospels. This infinite variety forced him to make a choice and remodel extensively. In the prefaces to his works, which have been gathered together in one famous book, he expresses the alarm he felt at the responsibility he incurred. Here, for instance, is the one he addressed to Pope Damasius, above his Latin translation of the Gospels.

"From an old work, you oblige me to make a new one. You wish me to judge between the different versions of the Scriptures which are scattered throughout the whole world, and as they vary among themselves, I am to select those which agree with the true Greek text. It is a pious labour, but perilous daring on the part of one who is to be judge by all, to himself judge others, an to try to change the language of an old man, and to bring back to youth a world already old.

"Truly what learned man, or even what ignorant one, but will, when he reads for the first time, the new version, and sees that it disagree with the one he is accostumed to read, cry out at once on me, accusing me of sacrilege, of forgery, because I have dared to add, change and correct the ancient books.

"Two reason comfort me under these accusations. The first is that you, the sovereign Pontiff, have commanded me, and the second is that truth cannot exist in things that differ, even if they have the approbation of the wicked.

"This short preface applies only to the four Gospels which are in the following order, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

"After having compared a certain number of Greek Versions from among the oldest, which do not differ essentially from these Versions, we have combined them in such a fashion (ita calamo temperavimus) that, correcting only what appeared to us to alter the sense, we have kept the rest as it was." ³

Thus, it was according to a first translation from Hebrew into Greek, for the versions bearing the names of Mark and Matthew, and, in a more general manner, from numerous copies all differing among themselves (tot sunt enim exemplaria quot codices) that the Vulgate was put together, corrected, augmented and modified, as the author himself admits, from ancient manuscripts.

This official translation, which was certainly intended to be final by the Pope who ordered its execution, was nevertheless remodelled at various times by order of other Roman Pontiffes. That which was considered good between the years 386 and 1586, and was approved by the Council of Trent, was declared insufficient and erroneous by Sixte-Quint in 1590. A new revision was made by his orders, and that edition which bore his name was again modified by Clement VIII, whose edition is in use to-day. From this the French translations of the Canonical books, which have been tampered with so often during the ages, have been made.


Nevertheless, in spite of all these vicissitudes, we do not hesitate to admit the authenticity of the Gospels in their primitive texts. The word of Christ appears therein with power, and all doubt must vanish under the spell of His sublime personality. Through the altered or distorted version, one feels the force of the grand original idea. The hand of the great Sower is seen in the depth of these teachings, in which are united moral beauty and love, and one recognises a celestial envoy.

But, beside this powerful hand, the feeble hand of man has introduced into these pages weak conceptions, which do not agree with the fundamental thought, and which provoke incredulity.

If the Gospels are acceptable on many points, it is still necessary to submit them as a whole to the verdict of reason. All the words and deeds recorded in them cannot be attributed to Christ.

During the period which separated the death of Jesus from the final compilation of the Gospels, many sublime thoughts had been forgotten, many doubtful things had come to be accepted as true, many badly interpreted precepts had warped the original instruction. The most beautiful, the strongest branches of this tree of life had been cut off to serve various ends. Man had smothered at their birth those great principles which would have led to peoples to the true faith which they are still seeking to-day.

The thought of Christ still lives in the teachings of the Church and in the sacred writings, but mixed with diverse elements of all kinds, introduced by the popes and the councils, in order to assure, to fortify and render absolute the authority of the Church. That is the object which has been pursued through the ages, and which has caused the constant remodeling of the original documents. In spite of all, what yet remains in the Church of truly Christian spirit, has been sufficient to engender admirable works, works of charity which make the glory of the Christian Churches, and which show up strangely in company with the ambitious enterprises with which are surrounded, enterprises inspired by the love of power and material advantages.

A great work would be necessary to separate Christ's real thought from the mass of the Gospels, a work possible, though arduous, for those inspired and guided by a sure intuition, but impossible for those who would undertake to wander, trusting only to their own faculties, through this labyrint, in which are mixed truth and fiction, the sacred with profane, the genuine with the false.

In all ages certain men, under the impulse of a superior force, have consecrated themselves to this difficult task.

Supported and illuminated by that divine spark which only shows itself intermittently to men, but which is never extinguished, they have braved all acusations, all tortures even, to affirm what they believed to be the truth. Of such were the Apostles of the Reformation. They died at thei post, but from out of space they still support and inspire those who fight for this great cause. Thanks to their efforts the darkness of night is beginning to lift from many souls, and a brilliant dawn is at hand.

It is by the aid of the light conveyed by this new revelation, both scientific and philosophical, which has alread spread throughout the whole world, under the name of Modern Spiritualism, that we will seek to free the doctrine of Jesus from the obscurity in which the work of centuries has developed it.

We shall thus arrive at the conclusion that His doctrine and that of the spirits are identical, that Spiritualism is simply the return to primitive Christianity under more definite form, and we shall do so with an imposing train of experimental proofs which will render impossible the renewed misrepresentation of the ideas of Christ.


1 See note 1 at the end of the book.

² See note 3, at the end of the book.

³Works of St Jerome, edition of the Benedictins 1693, V. I. Col. 1425 .


CHAPTER III


Hidden Meaning of the Gospels

A CERTAIN school atributes to Christianity in general and to the Gospels in particular, an allegorical and hidden meaning. Some thinkers even go as far as to deny the existence of Jesus; they only see in His words and life a philosophical idea, an abstraction to which a personality had been given to satisfy the tradition which foretold a Saviour, a Messiah for the Jewish people.

According to them, the history of Jesus is only a poetical drama, representing the birth, death and resurrection of the idea of freedom among the down-trodden Jewish people, or else a series of pictures to show to the masses the practical and social sides of Christianity, the union of the divine and human types in a model of perfection offered for the admiration of mankind.

If we accepted this view the Gospels would have to be considered as inventions and fables. The powerful movement of Christianity would have been started by an imposture! This is a very evident exaggeration. If the life of Jesus was only a fiction, how did it come to be accepted, firstly by His contemporaries, then by a long series of generations.

Who were in that case the real founders of Christianity? The Apostles? They were incapable of such a conception.

With the exception of Paul who found the doctrine already formed, they were notoriously unlearned. The grand personality of Jesus stands out against the background of mediocrity afforded by His disciples. The most superficial ecamination will show us the impossibility of this hypothesis.

One can easily distinguish in the Gospels the additions of the Christian Jews, which clearly show their origin, and form a striking contrast to the words and doctrines of Jesus. ¹ It is evident from this fact that authors imbued to such an extent with narrow and superstitious views were incapable of inventing a personality, a doctrine, a life and a death, like those of Christ.

In the sombre and exclusive Jewish world, filled with egotism and hatred, the doctrine of fraternity and love could only emanate from an unusually high intelligence.

If the Scriptures, as a whole, were nothing but a collection of allegories, a pure work of imagination, the doctrine of Jesus could not have maintained itself through the ages, in the midst of the diverse currents which agitated the Christian world. A building without a foundation, it would have crumbled to pieces by the mere force of time. But it is still alive and powerful, in spite of the alterations to which it has been subjected, in spite of all that men have done to disifgure it, to drown it in a deluge of erroneous interpretations.

The belief in a myth would not have been sufficient to inspire the early Christians with the spirit of martyrdom, with heroism in the face of death; it would not have furnished them with the means of establishing a religion which has lasted twenty centuries. Truth alone can defy the ages, and keep its force, its gradeur, in face of all efforts to undermine it.

Jesus is truly the coner-stone of Christianity, the soul of the new revelation.

Besides, historical testimony to the existence of Jesus, though limited, is not wholly missing. Suetonius, in his history of the firs Caesars, speaks of the execution of "Christus." Both he and Tacitus mention the existence of a sect of Christians among the Jews, before the taking of Jerusalem by Titus.

The Talmud speaks of the death of Jesus on the cross, and all the Jewish rabbis acknowledge the value of this testimony.

If need need were, the Gospels themselves would furnish us with the moral proof of the existence and high mission of the Christ. If numbers of apocryphal occurrences have been introduced into them later on, if the Jewish superstitions are found in them under the form of fanciful recitals and superannuated theories, there still remain two things which could not have been invented and which carry in themselves their own stamp of authenticity: the sublime drama of Calvary, and the profound and gentle teachings of Jesus.

These teachings are simple and clear in their essential principles; they are addressed to the people, especially to the poor and humble. They instruct the heart, and elighten and strengthen the conscience. They also contain traces of a secret doctrine. Jesus often spoke in parables. His thought, usually so luminously clear, is sometimes veiled in a semi-obscurity, and one only sees the outlines of a grand idea through the mask of a symbol. He explains this when he quotes Is. VII. 9, and adds: "I speak to them in parables, for it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but to them it is not given." (Matt. XIII. 10, 11.)

It is evident that htere were two doctrines in primitive Christianity, one for the people, presented in a form easily understood of all, and the other a secret doctrine, reserved for disciples and initiates.

The proof of the existence of this secret teachings is found in the words already quoted and in the following ones. After the parable of the sower, the disciples asked Jesus to explain its meaning and He replied: "Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, but unto them that are without all these things are done in parables; that seeing, they may see, and not perceive, and hearing they may hear, may see, and not understand." (Mark IV. 11, 12.)

St. Paul confirms this in his first Epistle to the Corinthians, chap. III., when he draws the difference between the language to be used to the carnal man and that to the spiritual man, namely, to the profane and the initiates.

The initiation was doubtless gradual. Those who received it were anointed, and afterwards entered into the communion of Saints. This gives us the key to these words of John: "But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. I have not written to you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it."

The founder of Christianity never separated the religious idea from its social application. "The Kingdom of Heaven" was to Him the perfect association of spirits of which He wished to create the image on earth. But He met the resistance of already established interests, and thousands of obstacles and danger sprang up around Him, adding a new reason for hiding under a parable or a miracle that which, in His doctrine, was bound to shock old ideas and threaten political and religious institutions. The obscurities of the Gospel were therefore intentional, the higher truths being hidden under the veil of symbolism. Man was taught that which he needed to shape his moral conduct in everyday life, but the profound philosophical meaning of the doctrine was reserved for a small number. ²

Hence the "Communion of Saints, the communion of elevated thought, of high and pure aspirations." This communion lasted but a short time. Earthly passions and ambitions soon destroyed it and politics introduced themselves into the priesthood. Bishops, from humble adepts, and modest overseers, became powerful and proud. Theocracy was established and sson succeeded in hiding the light under a bushel, and the light was extinguished. The deeper thought disappeared and the material symbols alone remained. This darkness rendered easier the task of governing the people. The priesthood preferred to leave the masses plunged in the depths of ignorance rather than elevate them to the heights of intellect. The Christian mysteries were henceforth explained only to churchmen. The thinkers, the earnest seekers who endeavoured to reach the lost truths were persecuted as heretics. The darkness became deeper and deeper over the world after the dissolution of the Roman Empire, and the belief in Satan and hell took on great proportions in the Christian faith. The religion of love preached by Jesus was replaced by the religion of fear.

The invasion of the barbarians also contributed much to this state of things in bringing society back to a condition of childhood, for the invaders were, in intellectual development, mere children themselves. From the vast plains and deep forests, the barbarian world hurled itself against civilisation. These ignorant and rough multitudes caused an intellectual decadence both in the pagan and Christian world. Christianity succeeded in conquering them, but at a great cost to itself. The divine ideal was veiled, and worship became material. To impress the imagination of the masses, idolatrous practices were revived, which were worthy only of the earliest ages of humanity, and to dominate the people and lead them by both fear and hope, the strangest dogmas were combined. The idea of realisin on earth the reign of God and of His justice, which had been that of the early Christians, was lost sight of. The announcement of the end of the world and the last judgement taken literally, the cares of individual salvation, traded on by the priests, and a thousand other causes combined to turn Christianity out of its true channel and drown Jesus' great idea in a flood of superstition.

But against these evils we must set the services rendered by the Church to the cause of humanity. Without its hierarchy and powerful organisation, without the papacy which opposed the power of the sword by that of the mind, however obscured and mistaken, it is difficult to think what would have become of the moral life and conscience of humanity. In the midst of those ages of violence, lawlessness and darkness, the Christian faith inspired these barbarous people with a new ardour which instigated them to generous tasks, such as the Crusades, the founding of the orders of chivalry, and the creation of the arts of the middle ages. In the silence and peace of the cloisters, thought found refuge. Moral life, thanks to Christian institutions, was never completely extinguished, in spite of the brutal habits of the age. These are services for which we must thank the Church, in spite of the questionable means which she has used to ensure her rule over the human soul.

To resume, the doctrine of the Crucified One demanded, in its popular form, the conquest of eternal life by the sacrifice of the present. The religion of salvation, of the elevation of the soul by domination over matter, Christianity, constituted a necessary reaction against Greek and Roman polytheism, which although full of light was nevertheless a hot-bed of sensuality and corruption. Christianity marked an indispensable stage in the march of humanity, whose destiny is to rise from belief to belief, from conception to conception, towards the ever greater and nobler.

The era of Christianity, with its twelve centuries of darkness and trouble, was not one of happiness for the human race, but the aim of earthly life is not happiness, it is the elevation, by work, study, and suffering, in a word, the education of the soul, and the difficult and thorny path leads the more surely to perfection.

Christianity represents a profitable phase in the history of humanity, which would have been incapable of carrying out the social works which will build up its future, if it had not been impregnated with the thought and moral of the Gospels.

The Church is nevertheless to blame for having attempted to prolong indefinitely this state of ignorance. After having fed and protected the child, she tried to keep it in submission and intellectual servitude. She saved consciences only to oppress them. The Roman Church did not preserve the divine torch entrusted to her, and in chastisement from on high, or rather by the working of the just law of compensation, the darkness which she tried to spread around now reigns in her own bosom. She has never ceased to oppose the development of science and philosophy, going so far as to proscribe, from St Peter's chair, "progress, that eternal Law, liberality and modern civilisation." (Article 80 of the "Syllabus.")

Therefore it is outside of her, and even in opposition to her, that, starting from a certain moment of history, the whole movement of evolution of the human spirit has been accomplished. It took centuries to dissipate the darkness of the Middle Ages. It required the renaissance of letters, the religious reformation of the sixteenth century, philosophy, all the conquests of science which prepared the ground for the new revelation, for the voices from beyond the tomb which come by myriads, and from all points of the earth, to recall to man the pure teachings of Christ, to re-establish His doctrines, to render comprehensible all the great truths buried in the mists of ages.

¹
See notes 2 and 3, at the end of the book.

² See note No. 4 at the end of the book.

CHAPTER IV

THE SECRET DOCTRINE


WHAT is the real doctrine of Christ? Its essential principles are clearly set forth in the Gospels. The universal Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man, with the moral consequences following thereon; immortal life open to all, and allowing each one to realise in himself the "Kingdom of God", that is to say, perfection by detachment from the goods of this world, the forgiveness of injuries, and love of one's neighbour.

Love, according to Jesus, is the summing up of the whole of religion, the whole of philosophy.

"Love your enenies, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, that ye may be the children of your Father, which is in heaven: for He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the goo, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye?" (Matt. V. 44 and following).
God himself sets us the example of this love, for His arms are always open to the sinner: "It is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish."

The Sermon on the Mount condenses the popular teachings of Jesus. Moral law is there expressed in a form never equalled. Man may there learn tht the surest means of elevation are the humblest and hidden virtues. "Blessed are the poor in spirit (humble and loyal souls). Blessed are they that mourn for they shall be comforted. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled. Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God" (Matt. V. 1-12; Luke VI. 20-25).

What Jesus desired was not a luxurious worship, a sacerdotal religion, rich in ceremonies and practices which smother thought, but a worship, simple and pure, of the spirit, consisting in direct intercommunion, without intermediary, between man and God his Father.

"For the hour cometh and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth" (John IV. 23, 24).

Jesus prayed and meditated in solitary places, in those natural temples whose columns are the mountains, whose dome is the sky, and whence thought can freely rise to its Creator, but He never practised asceticism. To those who tried to work their salvation by fasting and abstinence, He said: "Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man, but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man" (Matt. XV. 11).

And to the lovers of long orisons: "Your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask Him" (Matt. VI. 8).

He inculcates only charity, kindness and simplicity, "Judge not that ye be not judged. Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors. Be ye therefore merciful as your Father also is merciful. It is more blessed to give than to receive. Whosoever shal exalt himself shal be abased, and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted."

"When thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth. That thy alms may be in secret, and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly."

All is resumed in these concise and eloquent words: "Love thy neighbour as thyself, and be ye perfect even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. For this is the law and the prophets."

The gentle words of Jesus lend a penetrating, irresistible charm to His doctrine, full as it is of tender solicitude for the weak and disinherited ones of the earth. It is the glorification of poverty and simplicity. Material possessions render us slaves and chain us to the earth. Riches are fetters, they check the upward flight of the soul, and keep it from the "Kingdom of God." Renunciation and humility detach these fetters, and facilitate our ascension towards the light.

It is through this that the doctrine of the Gospels has remained throughout the ages the highest expression of spiritualism, the supreme remedy for earthly ills, the consolation of afflicted souls on this road of life, strewn with so many tears and so much anguish. It is in this that still consists, in spite of all the foreign elements mixed with it, the grandeur and moral power of Christianity.

The secret doctrine went further still. Under the veil of parables and fiction were hidden profound truths. The immortality promised to all was more clearly indicated by the affirmation of succcessive earthly lives, in which the soul, reincarnated in new bodies, suffered the consequences of its previous existences and prepared the conditions of its future destiny.

The plurality of inhabited worlds was also taught, the alternations in the life of every creature between the earthly world in which he reappears at birth, and the spiritual world to which he returns at death, reaping in each the fruits, good or bad, of his past. The close union and "oneness of these two worlds was shown, and, consequently, the possibility of communion between mand and the spirits of the dead which people space."

From this teachings grows active love, not only for those who suffer in this earthly life, but for the souls of those who wander around us, pursued by painful memories.

From this also follows love for the two humanities, visible and invisible, the law of brotherhood in life and in death, the celebration of the so-called "mysteries" and communion of thought and heart with those spirits, good or mediocre, inferior or elevated, which compose that invisible world surrounding us, into which open two doors, the cradle and the tomb, through which pass alternately all created beings.

The law of incarnation is indicated in a number of passages of Scripture. It must be considered under two aspects, the return in the flesh of spirits on their way to gain perfection, and the reincarnation of spirits sent to earth on a mission.

In His interview with Nicodemus, Jesus thus expresses himself: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." Nicodemus objects "How can a man be born when he is old?" Jesus answers: "Verily I say unto you, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I have said unto thee, ye must be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound  thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit" (John III. 3-8). Jesus adds these significant words: "Art thou a master of Israel and knowest not these things?"

Which shows that he was not speaking of baptism, which was known by the Jews and by Nicodemus, but of the reincarnation already taught by the "Zohar," a sacred book of the Hebrews.
¹

This wind or spirit which "bloweth where it listeth" is the soul which chooses a new body, a new dwelling, though men do not know "whence it cometh or whiter it goeth." It is the only satisfactory explanation.

In the Hebraic "Kabbala" water is primary matter, the fructifying element. As to the expression "Holy Spirit," which we find in the text, and which renders it incomprehensible, it is to be observed that the word "Holy" is not in the original, and was only introduced into it a long time after, as in many other cases. We must therefore read: "reborn of matter and of spirit."

Another day, in speaking of a man blind from his birth, whom they met on the road, the disciples asked Jesus: "Master, who did sin, this man of his parents, that he was born blind?" (John IX. 1,2).

This question shows that the disciples attributed the blind man's infirmity to an expiation. In their belief, the sin preceded the punishment, and was the cause of it. It is the law of the consequences of actions fixing the conditions of destiny. Here, it was the case of a man blind from his birth, the sin could therefore only have been comitted in a previous existence.

From this comes the idea of penance which we constantly meet in the Scriptures. "Do penance", they tell us repeatedly; that is to say, accomplish the reparation which is the object of your new life, rectify your past, spiritualise yourselves; for you will only escape from the earthly dominions, from the circle of trials, after having "paid to the uttermost farthing" (Matt. V. 26).

Theologians have in vain sought to explain otherwise than by reincarnation this passage of Scripture. They have fallen into the strangest lines of reasoning. It is thus that the Synod of Amsterdam found no way out of the quandary but by declaring "the man born blind sinned in his mother's womb."
1.1

It is also a belief of the time that eminent spirits returned, in renewed incarnations, to continue and complete missions interrupted by death. For instance, Elias returned to earth in the person of John the Baptist. Jesus confirms it thus, addressing the multitude: "What went ye but for to see? A prophet? Yea, I say unto you, and more than a prophet. For, if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear" (Matt. XI. 9, 14, 15).

And later, after the decapitation of John the Baptist, He repeated it to His disciples: "And His disciples asked Him, saying: 'Why the say the scribes thta Elias must first come' And Jesus answered and said unto them: 'Elias truly shall first come and restore all things. But I say unto you that Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed.' Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist." (Matt. XVII. 10, 11, 12, 15).

Thus, to Jesus as well as to His disciples, Elias and John the Baptist were one and the same personality. If this personality inhabited successively two bodies, such a fact can only be explained by the law of reincarnation.

Under memorable circumstances Jesus asks His disciples: "Whom do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?" And they said: "Some say that Thou art John the Baptist; some Elias, and others Jeremias or one of the Prophets" (Matt. XVI. 13, 14; Mark VIII. 28).

Jesus does not protest against this opinion, as a doctrine, any more than He protested in the case of a man born blind. The question which He then puts to Peter, has reference only to Himself. "But whom say ye that I am?"

We come across the secret doctrine, hidden under more or less transparent veils, in the writings of the Apostles and Fathers of the Church, during the early centuries. They could not speak openly of it, hence the obscurities of their language. (See Epistle of St Barnabas XVII. 1, 5.)

It is according to this rule that a disciple of St Paul, Hermas, describes the law of reincarnation under the figure of "white stones, squared and cut,  taken from the water, to be used in the construction of a spiritual edifice." (Book of the Pastor III. 3, 5).

"Why have these stones been taken from a deep place and employed for the building of this tower, since they are already animated by the spirit? It was needful, said the Lord unto me, that before being admitted into the edifice, they should be elevated by water. They cannot otherwise enter into the kingdom of God, except by purifying themselves of the infirmity of their first life."

Evidentely these stones are the souls of men; these waters (according to Jewish Kabbalists, representing matter, primary element, today called cosmic ether) are the obscure inferior regions, the material lives, the lives of trial and suffering during which the souls are cut, polished, and slowly prepared, so as one day to take their place in the edifice of the higher, the celestial life. This is certainly the symbol of reincarnation, the belief in which was yet admitted in the third century, and generally accepted among Christians.

Among the Fathers of the Church, Origen was one of those who pronounced himself the most eloquently in favour of the plurality of lives. His authority has great weight. St Jerome considers him, "after the Apostles, as the greater master in the Church, a truth which," he says, "only the ignorant will deny." St Jerome professes such an admiration for Origen that he is willing, he writes, to shoulder all the calumnies which have been directed against him, if at that price, he, Jerome, could have his profound knowledge of the Scriptures. In his celebrated arguments which, in the pre-existence and survival of souls in other bodies, in the succesion of lives, or briefly, in the necessary corrective to the apparent inrregularity of human conditions, show a compensation for the physical as well as for the moral wrong which would seem to reign in the world, if only one earthly existence were admitted for each soul. Origen nevertheless errs on one point. It is when he presumes the union of spirit and body to be always a punishment. He loses sight of the necessity of the education of the soul and the lavorious realisation of progress.

An erroneous opinion has often crept in on the subject of Origen's doctrines in general, and the plurality of lives in particular, which are considered to have been condemned by the Council of Chalcedon, and later by the fifth Council of Constantinople. If one goes to the fountain head,
² one
sees that these Councils respected, not the belief in the plurality of lives of the soul, but simply pre-existence in the particular form taught by Origen, which was that men were all fallen angels.

In fact the question of plurality of lives of the soul has never been settled by the Church. It remains to be handled by the Church of the future, which is an important point to observe. As the doctrine of rebirth, so also that of the plurality of lives is indicated in the Scriptures, under parabolic form. "In my Father's house are many mansions. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also" (John XIV. 2, 3).

The Father's house is the celestial infinity, the promised mansions are the worlds travelling through space, spheres of light, compared with which our poor earth is only an obscure and feeble planet. It is to these worlds that Jesus will guide the souls who follow Him and His doctrine. He knows them well, and will be able to prepare for each of us a place according to our merits.

Origen comments on these words very clearly: "the Lord alludes to the different stations that the souls are to occupy, after they have put off their present bodies, and have taken on new ones."

 
¹  1.1  See note 5, at the end of the book.
² See Pezzani, "Plurality of Lives," pp. 187-190.

CHAPTER V

Intercourse with the Spirits of the Dead

THE early Christians communicated with the spirits of the dead, and received instructions from them. No doubt is possible on this subject, for testimony abounds. This testimony we gather from the text itself of the canonical Books. These passages have escaped, we hardly know how, the vicissitudes of time, and their authenticity is all the better established, inasmuch as they are in flagrant oposition to the present views of the Church.¹ These texts probably escaped because they were not understood.

Christianity as a whole rests on the facts of apparitions and manifestations of the dead. It furnishes numberless proofs of the existence of the invisible world, and the souls who people it.

These proofs abound equally in the Old and the New Testaments. In both we find apparitions of angels, (in Hebrew, messengers) of spirits of the just, warnings and revelations given by the spirits of the dead, the gift of prophecy (which mean not only foretelling the future, but speaking and teaching under the influence of the spirits), and the gift of healing.

The life of Christ was a constant communion with the invisible world. The son of Maary was gifted with faculties which enabled Him to have intercourse with spirits. These sometimes rendered themselves visible beside Him.

His disciples, chosen not from among the learned, but among sensitives or mediums, were frightened on seeing Him converse one day on Mount Tabor with Moses and Elias.

In moments of difficulty, when some questions embarrased Him, as in the case of the woman taken in adultery, He invoked the higher spirits, and His finger traced in the sand the answer to be given, as in our day our mediums, moved by an outside force, trace words on a slate.

These facts are known, related and commented on, but many others, connected with this continual intercourse between Jesus and the invisible, remained unknown even of those who surrounded Him.

The relations of Christ with the world of spirits is shown by the constant support which this divine emissary received from "the beyond."

At times, in spite of His courage and self-denial, He was troubled by the greatness of His task, and He lifted His soul to God. He implored, He prayed for new forces; and He was answered. A powerful breath passed over His head. Under an irrestible impulse, He reproduced the thoughts suggested to Him; He felt Himself succoured and comforted.


In His hours of solitude, Hes eyes perceived, traced in letters of fire, the will of Heaven;² voices sounded in His ears, and through them the answers to His ardent prayers. It was the direct transmission of the teachings He was to spread, the regenerating precepts for the propagation of which He had come to earth. The vibrations of the supreme thought which animate the universe were felt by Him, and impregnated Him with those eternal principles which He taught, which will never be effaced from the memory of man. He heard the divine accents, and His lips repeated the words of the sublime revelation, mysterious even yet for many, but for Him, confirmation absolute of the constant protection and intuitions which came to Him from the higher worlds.

And when this great life was accomplished; when the sacrifice was consummated; when Jesus was nailed to the Cross, and then laid in the tomb, His spirit affirmed itself by new manifestations. This powerful spirit, that no tomb could bold, appeared to those He had left on earth, sad, down-cast, and discouraged. It told them that death was nothing. By its presence it gave them courage, energy, and the moral strength needed to accomplish the mission confided to them.

The apparitions of Christ are well known, and had many witnesses. He appeared and disappeared instantaneously. He changed His form and His appearance. He entered a house through closed doors. At Emmaus he conversed with two of His disciples who did not recognise Him, and then suddenly disappeared. He was in possession of that fluidic body which is in each of us, that subtle body which is the inseparable envelope of each soul, and which a high spirit such as He knew how to direct, modify, condense, and rarefy at will.³
He condensed it to such a degree that he rendered it visible and tangible to those present.

The appearances of Jesus after His death are the very basis, the vital point of the Christian doctrine. That is why St Paul says: "If Christ is not risen, then is your faith vain." In Christianity, immortality is not a hope; it is a natural fact, a fact supported by the testimony of our senses. The apostles did not merely believe in resurrection, they were sure of it. That is why their preaching carried conviction with it. By the crucifixion of Jesus Christianity was struck to the heart. The disciples, in consternation, were ready to disperse. But Christ appeared to them, and their faith in Him became so profound, that, to confess Him, they braved the worst torments. The apparition of Christ after His death assured the persistence of the Christian idea by giving it the basis of a collection of facts.

It is tru that man has introduced confusion among these phenomena, by attributing to them a miraculous character. Miracles are contradictions of the eternal laws fixed by God, and it would scarcely be worthy of the Supreme Power to transgress His own mature, and vary His decrees.

According to the Church, Jesus rose with His earthly body. That is contrary to the primitive text of the Gospels. These sudden apparitions, with change of forme, producing themselves in enclosed places, could only be spirit manifestations, fluidic and natural. Jesus rose as we shall all rise, when our spirit leaves its prison of the flesh.

In Mark and Matthew, and in the recital of Paul (I Cor. XV.) these apparitions are described in the most precise manner. According to Paul, the body of Christ was incorruptible; it had neither flesh nor blood. This opinion comes from the most ancient tradition. The material version only appeared later, with Luke. The tale becomes complicated then, and adorned with many marvellous details, with the evident intention of impressing the reader. Clement of Alexandria relates a tradition which still circulated in his day, according to which John thrust his hand into the body of Jesus, and it passed through it without meeting with any resistance. ("Jesus of Nazareth," by Alvert Reville, second volume, note to page 470.)
   
This materialistic idea, as in general the whole theory of miracles, results from a wrong interpretation of the laws of the universe. It is the same with the idea of the supernatural, which corresponds to an insufficient conception of the order of the world, and the rules of life. In reality, there is nothing outside of nature, which is the divine work in its fullest expression. The mistake of man comes from the narrow idea he entertains of nature and the forms of life, which he limits within the circle of his own senses. But our senses can only embrace a very restricted portion of our surroundings. Beyond those limits life continues under rich and varied aspects, and under subtle forms which graduate themselves, multiply, and renew themselves indefinitely.

This dominion of the invisible belongs to the fluidic world; it is peopled by the spirits of men who have inhabited the earth, and have put off their gross envelope. They exist in this subtle form of which we have spoken, a form which is still material, although ethereal; for matter has many states with which are not familiar. This form is the image or the mould of the carnal bodies which these spirits have inhabited during their sucessive lives. The bodies pass, but the forms remain, with the spirits of which they are the indestructible organism.

Spirits occupy various situations according to their moral elevation. Their brilliance, their power, become greater as they arrive higher in the scale of virtues, of perfection, and as they serve with more devotion the cause of right and humanity. It is these beings or spirits who manifest themselves at all epochs of history, and in all places, through the intermediary of subjects specially gifted, who according to the period, are called diviners, sybyls, prophets, or mediums.

The apparitions which marked the early days of Christianity, as well as the most ancient biblical times, were not isolated phenomena, but the manifestation of a universal and eternal law, which has always regulated the relations between the inhabitants of the two worlds; the world of gross matter, to which we belong, and the fluidic and invisible world peopled by the spirits of those we so improperly term "the dead."

It is only recently that science has been able to study these manifestations. Thanks to the observations of numerous scientists, the existence of the spirit-world has been recognised as a fact, and the laws which rule it have been determined with a certain amount of precision.

The presence in every human being of a fluidic double, surviving death, has been proved; and in this double we recognise the imperishable envelope of the spirit. This double, which also disengages itself during sleep, trance, or ecstasy, transports itself and acts at a distance during life, after the final separation from the carnal body becomes much more completely the faithful servant and the centre of the active forces of the spirit.

It is by the means of this fluidic envelope that the spirit produces these manifestations from the beyond, which are today known to all, since scientific commissions have studied the manifold aspects of them, even to weighing and photographing the spirits; as did Sir William Crookes with the spirit of Katie King, and Sir Russel Wallace and Prof. Aksakof with those of Abdullah and John King.

It is thus that these phenomena, undoubtedly strange, and hitherto little studied, but perfectly natural, since they are produced by spirits, that is to say by creatures like ourselves in their essential life-principles, it is thus that they have little by little entered into the dominion of observation, and passed into the order of established facts.

For long, too long, men regarded them only as miracles provoked by God Himself or by His angels; and opinion which was carefully fostered by the priests, in order to strike the imaginations of the people and render them more docile to their will.

We find, in the Scriptures, frequent examples of mistakes of this kind. At Patmos, John saw a spirit whom he was about to worship, but who told him that he was the spirit of one of his brethren, the prophets. In this case the mistake was corrected, and the spirit made known his personality, but in how many others the error has persisted? It is the same with the frequent intervention of angels in the Bible. It behoves one to be on guard against the tendency of the Jews and Christians to attribute to God and His angels the phenomena produced by the spirits of the dead, phenomena on which it was left for our era to shed light, by replacing them in their true position.

In Jesus' day, the belief in immortality was weakened. The Jews were divided on the subject of a future life. The Sadducean sceptics added to the numbers and influence of the doubtful. Then Jesus came. He opened wide the doors of communication between the earthly and the spiritual worlds. He brought the invisible near to the human, so that they could correspond anew. With a gesture of His powerful hand, He raised the veil of death; and, from the mids of the darkness, appeared visions. These visions, and these voices, affirmed to man his immortality.


Primitive Christianity has then this special characteristic: it brought closer together the two humanities, terrestrial and celestial; it rendered more intense the relations between the visible and invisible worlds. In each Christian group, as today in each spiritualist group, invocations were practised. They possessed mediums both for inspirational speaking and for physical effects, as is recorded in the First Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians. The, as now, certain subjects possessed the gifts of prophecy, of healing, etc.

In the above-mentioned epistle, St Paul speaks also of the body spiritual, imponderable, incorruptible: "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body and there is a spiritual body" (I Cor. XV. 44). The apparition of Jesus on the road to Damascus, which made a Christian of Paul, was a spiritualistic phenomenon. Paul had not known Christ; he himself tells us that he drew his inspirations from his occult relations with the Son of Mary.

St Paul was not only helped by the spirits of light of whom he was the interpreter; he was sometimes obsessed by inferior spirits, and was obliged to resist their influence.
4 It is thus, that, under all circumstances, for the education and development of man, light and shade, truth and error, are mixed. It is the same in modern spiritualism where all orders of manifestations are met with, from messages of the highest character, to the vulgarest phenomena produced by backward spirits. But even these have their use from the point of view of the elements of observation which they furnish, and the many cases of identity supplied by them to science.

St Paul knew these things; taught by experiences, he warned his brethren, "the prophets," as mediums were then called, to be on their guard against these ambushes. He adds, as a consequence, "that the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets" (I Cor. XIV. 32), which is to say, that the teachings of the spirits are not to be blindly accepted, but to be submitted to the test of reason.

In the same connection, John says: "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they be of God" (I John IV. 1).

The Acts of the Apostles furnish many indications of the relations of the disciples of Jesus with the invisible world. We see how, following the instructions of spirits,5 the Apostles came to cease making a distinction between different meats, and to open the barrier which separated the Jew from the Gentile, and to replace circumcision by baptism. 6

Communications between Christians and the spirits of the dead was such a common occurrence during the early centuries that precise instructions were circulated on the subject.

Hermas, the disciple of the Apostles, the same whom St Paul sends salutations in his Epistle to the Romans (chap. XVI. 14), indicated in his "Book of the Pastor," the means of distinguishing between good and bad spirits. This "Book of the Pastor" was read in the churches as now the Gospels and Epistles are, until the fifth century. St Clement of Alexandria and Origen speak of it with respect. It figures in the most ancient catalogue of the canonical books received by the Roman Church, and published by Caius about 220 A.D.

In the following lines, written eighteen hundred years ago, one could imagine oneself reading the faithful description of a séance of invocation, as conducted today in many places:-

"The spirit which comes from God is peaceful and humble; it discards all malice and vain desires of this world, and rises above men. It does not answer all who question, nor any particular person, for the spirit which comes from God does not speak to man when man wills, but when God permits. Therefore, when a man who has a spirit from God comes into an assembly of the faithful, and when prayer has been offered, the spirit fills this man who speakes as God wills." (A speaking medium.)

"On the contrary, an earthly spirit is easily recognised; it is vain, withou wisdom, and without force; it agitates and struggles for the highest place. It is importunate, talkative, and does not prophesy without recompense."

The revelations of the spirits continued long after the apostolic period. During the second and third centuries the Christians addressed themselves directly to the souls of the dead to decide points of doctrine. St Gregory the thaumaturgist, and bishop of Neo-Cesarea, declares he "received from John the evangelist, in a vision, the symbol of his faith, preached by him in his church." 7

Origen, the sage whom St Jerome considers as the greatest master of the Church, after the Apolstles, speaks often in his works of the manifestations of the dead.

In his controversy with Celsus, he says: "I doubt not that Celsus will rail at me, but mockery will not prevent me from saying that many people have embraced the Christian Faith in spite of themselves, their hearts having been suddenly changed by some spirit, either in an apparition or a dream; so that in place of the aversion they felt from our faith, they loved it to the death. I take God to witness of the truth of what I say, He knows that I would not recommend the doctrine of Jesus Christ by fabulous tales, but ty truth of incontestible facts."

The celebrated bishop of Hippon, St Augustin, is no less affirmative. In his letters he mentions "apparitions of the dead, coming and going in their accustomed dwellings, and making predictions, which are realised, of events to come." 8

In his treatise, "De cura pro mortuis," he speaks in these terms of the manifestations of the dead: "The spirits of the dead can be sent to the living, and can unveil to them the future which they themselves have learnt, either from other spirits or from angels, or by divine revelation." 9

In his "City of God," on the subject of the lucid ethereal body, which is the perispirit of the spirits, he speaks of practices which render it able to communicate with the spirits and angels and to receive visions.

St Clement of Alexandria, St Gregory of Nice, in his "Discours catéchétique," and St Jerome himself, in his famous controversy with Vigilantius the Gaul, pronounce themselves on the same side.

St Thomas Aquinas, the angel of the school, so tells us the Abbé Poussin, Professor at the Seminary at Nice, in his work "Spiritualism before the Church" (1866): "communicated with the inhabitants of the other world, with the dead who informed him of the state of the souls of those in whom he was interested, with the Saints, who comforted him, and opened up to him the treasures of divine knowledge."

When the Church, leaving behind her democratic and popular origin, became despotic and autocratic, she found it advisable to condemn through her Councils, spiritualistic practices. She alone wished to possess the monopoly of occult communications and the right to interpret them to suit herself. All laymen convicted of relations with the dead were persecuted as sorcerers and burned.

But this monopoly of relations with the invisible world, in spite of her judgments and condemnations, in spite of her wholsale executions, the Church never succeeded in obtaining. On the contrary, from that time onward, the most startling manifestations took place without her pale. The sources of high inspiration closed to the clerkes, remained open to heretics. History attests it. The voices of Joan of Arc, the familiar spirit of Tasso and of Jerome Cardan, the curious phenomena of the Middle Ages, caused by spirits of an inferior order, the convulsionists of St Médard, the little inspired prophets of the Cevennes, Swedenborg and his school; these and thousands of other facts form an uninterrupted chain, which reaches from the manifestations of remotest antiquity down to modern spiritualism.

Nevertheless, even recently in the very bosom of the Church, a few thinkers investigated problems of the invisible. Under the title "The Discernment of Spirits," Cardinal Bona, the Fénélon of Italy, devoted a work to the study of the different orders of manifestations which present themselves to man. "One has reason for astonishment," he writes, "that there should be found men of good sense who dare either deny entirely the apparitions and communications of spirits with the living, or attribute them to hallucinations or the arts of devils."

This Cardinal did not foresee the anathema launched by Catholic priests against spiritualism.

It must then be admitted that the dignitaries of the Church, who thundered from their pulpits against spiritualistic practices, were completely on the wrong track. They would not understand that the manifestations of the spirits are the basis of Christianity, and that the spiritualistic movement, twenty centuries later, is a reproduction of the original Christian movement. They did not remember in time that to deny the communications with the dead, or to attribute them to devils, was to put themselves at variance with the Fathers of the Church and the Apostles themselves. Already the priests of Jerusalem had accused Jesus of acting under the influence of Beelzebub. The "devil" theory has had its day; it is now out of date.

In reality, spiritualism is to be met with in all directions, not as a superstition, but as a fundamental law of nature.

Relations between men and spirits have always existed with more or less intensity; and by these means a continual revelation has been given throughout the world. A great river of spiritual power, the source of which is the invisible world, flows through the ages. At times this river hides itself in the shadows, it flows in the depths of history, it takes refuge under the vaults of the temples of India and of Egypt, in the mysterious sanctuaries of Gaul and of Greece; it is only known to sages and initiates. But at times also, times chosen by God, it emerges from hidden places, and reappears in the light of day, in the sight of all; it brings to humanity those riches, those hidden treasures which will embellish and regenerate it.

It is in this wise that the higher truths revealed themselves through the centuries to facilitate and stimulate human evolutions. Manifestations take place amongst us by the help of powerful mediums, and of spirits of genius who have lived on earth, and have suffered for truth and justice. These chosen spirits have returned to their life in space, but have not ceased to watch over men, and communicate with them.

At certain moments of history, a breath from on high blows over the world, the fogs which envelop human thought are dissipated; superstitions, doubts and chimeras vanish; the great laws of destiny reveal themselves; truth appears.

Happy are they who can recognise and receive it.


¹ See note 6. See No. 7, Spiritual Facts in the Bible.
² This (and several other passages of this work) has been communicated to me by a high spirit whose life was contemporaneous with that of Christ.
³ See note 9, on the Perispirit, or fluidic body.
4  2 Cor. XII. 7; Ephes. VI. 12.
In the Greek Gospels and the Acts, the word "spirit" is often alone. St Jerome added to it the word "Holy," and the French translators of the Vulgate made of it "Holy Spirits."   See "Spirite et Chretien" by Bellemare, from p. 270 onwards.
Acts XI. 8, 9, 27, 28; XVI. 6, 7, 18; XXI. 4. Romans XIV. 14. I Cor. XII. and XIV. See also note 6, Rev. C. Ware on the Acts.
"Abrégé de l'histoire eclésiastique" par l'Abbé Racine. St Gregory of Nice, in his "Life of St Gregory the Thaumaturgist" records this vision. See "Works of St Gregory of Nice," edition 1638, vol. III. pp. 545 and 546.
"Letter to Euodius." Ep. CLIX. Benedictine edition, vol. II. col. 562. And "De cura pro mortuis," vol. VI. col. 523.
"De cura pro mortuis," vol. VI. col. 527.

CHAPTER VI

THE ALTERATION OF CHRISTIAN DOGMAS



As specks of gold in the troubled mass of their teachings, the Church mingles pure evangelical morality wity its own conceptions.


We have seen that after the death of the Master, the early Christians possessed, in their intercourse with the invisible world, a fruitful source of inspiration. They used it openly. But the instructions of the spirits were not always in harmony with the views of many of the growing priesthood, who, if they found help in these relations, often met with severe censure and even condemnation.

We can see in the book of Père de Longueval,¹ how, as the dogmatic edifice of the Church was gradually built up in the early centuries, the spirits little by little detached themselves from the orthodox Christians to inspire those who were designated as heretics.

Montau, says the Abbé Fleury,² had two prophetesses, two rich and noble ladies, named Priscilla and Maximilla. Cérinthe also obtained revelations. Apollonius of Tyre was counted among those men favoured of heaven who are helped by a "supernatural spirit." Nearly all the masters of the school of Alexandria were inspired by superior spirits.

All these spirits, following the admission of St Paul; "For we know in part, we prophesy in part" (I Cor. XIII. 9), brought with them, they said, a revelation which was to complete and confirm that of Jesus.

From the third century, they affirmed that the dogmas imposed by the Church in defiance of reason were only obscuring the doctrines of Christ. They condemned the excessive and scandalous luxury of the bishops and protested energetically against all that seemed to them a relaxation of morals.³

This growing opposition soon became intolerable to the Church. The "heretics," advised and directed by the spirits, entered into open war with her. They interpreted the Scriptures with a broadness of view which the Church could not admit without ruining her material interests. Almost all became neo-platonians, and accepted the succession of the lives of man, and what Origen called the "medicinal punishments," that is to say, punishments proportioned to the sins of the soul, reincarnated in a new body to expiate its past and purify itself by pain.

For this doctrine, taught by the spirits, Origen and many Fathers of the Church found justification in the Scriptures. It was more in accord with the justice and mercy of God, who cannot condemn souls to eternal torments after one life only, but must give them the opportunity of elevating themselves by means of laborious existences, by trials accepted with resignation and supported with courage.

This doctrine of hope and of progress did not inspire, int the eyes of the Church, a sufficient degree of the dread of sin and of death. It detracted from the authority of the priesthood. Man, enabled to expiate his sin in his own person, did not need a priest. The gift of prophecy, the constant communication with spirits, undermined most surely the power of the Church, which, taking alarm, resolved to put an end to the struggle by stamping out prophecy. She imposed silence on all, invisible or human, who, with the object of spiritualising Christianity, affirmed ideas the elevation of which interfered with her.

After having accepted during three centuries, the gifts of prophecy and mediumship to which all could attain, according to the promise of the Apostles, as a sovereign means of elucidating religious problems and strengthening faith, the Church turned round and declared that all that came from this source was pure illusion, or the work of the devil. She announced herself with all the weight of her own authority, as being herself the only living prophecy, the only perpetual and permanent revelation. All that did not emanate from her was condemned and anathematised. All the grand teaching of the Gospels, of which we have spoken, all the work of the prophets which completes and illuminates them, is put aside. There was no more mention of spirits, nor of the elevation of humanity by a scale of existences and or worlds, nor of expiation of faults committed, nor of progress realised and work accomplished through an infinity of space and of time.

These teachings were lost sight of, and the real nature of the gifts of prophecy forgotten; so that modern comentators of the Scriptures say that "prophecy was the gift of explaining to the faithful the mysteries of religion." 4 The prophets werem according to them, "the bishop and the priest who judged by the gift of discernment and the rules of the Scriptures whether what was said came from the spirit of God or the spirit of the devil." This is in absolute contradiction to the opinion of the early Christians, who saw in the prophecies inspired messages not from God but from spirits, as St John says in the passage we have already quoted from his first Epistle, chap. IV. 1.

At one time it almost seemed as if the doctrine of Jesus, allied to the profound views of the Alexandrian prhilosophers, would prevail over the mystical tendencies of the Judeo-Christianity and lead man into the broad ways of progress, towards high spiritual inspiration. But disinterested men, loving truth for its own sake, were not numerous in the Councils. Doctrines better adapted to the earthly interests of the Church, were elaborated  by these assemblies, and checked and materialised religion. It was by them and under the influence of the Roman Pontiffs, that during the centuries there was gradually erected that scaffolding of curious dogmas which have nothing in common with the Gospels and are of much later date, and which form a sombre edifice in which human thought, like a captive eagle, powerless to unfold his wings and able to see only one small corner of the sky, was imprisoned as in a tomb.

The foundations of this massive structure, which bars the progress of humanity, were laid in 325, at the Council of Nicea, and it was completed in 1870, at the last Council of Rome. It has as a foundation Original Sin, and as a crown the Immaculate Conception, and the Infallibility of the Pope.

It is this monstrous work which has taught men to know that pitiless and revengeful God,that ever-yawning hell, that paradise closed to so many noble souls, to so many great intellects, but so easily acquired by a life of a few days only, if they included baptism. It is these conceptions which have driven so many to Atheism and despair.

Let us examine the principal dogmas and mysteries which constitute the teachings of the Christian Churches, and which we find in all the orthodox Catechisms.

Firstly there is that strange conception of the Divinity which leads to the mystery of the Trinity, one only God in three Persons, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Jesus brought to the world an idea of divinity hitherto unknown to the Jews - the God of Jesus was not the partial and jealous despot who protected Israel against other peoples - He was the God, the Father of humanity. All nations, all peoples, were His children - He was the God in whom all live and have their being, pervading nature and human conscience.


For the pagan world as well as the Jewish, this notion of God was a moral revolution. To men who had come to defy everything, and to fear all that they had defied, the doctrine of Jesus revealed the existence of only one God, Creatror, and Father, through whom all men are brothers, and in whose name they owe each other help and love. The communion with the Father was rendered possible by the brotherly union of the members of the human family. The way of perfection was opened to all through love of one's neighbour and evotion to humanity.

This doctrine, so simple and so grand, was calculated to elevate the human soul to imposing heights to kindle that divine fire of which each can feel in himself a spark. How did this pure and simple idea of the Divinity, become transformed so as to be unrecognisable?

It was the result of the passions and material interests which came into play in the Christian world after the death of Jesus. The idea of the Trinity, taken from a Hindoo legend which was the expression of a symbol, obscured this ideal of God. Human intelligence can conceive of an Eternal One who embraces the Universe and gives life to all creatures. It cannot understand how three persons can unite so as to form one God. The question of consubstantiality does not elucidate the problem. In vain they tell us that man cannot understand the nature of God. There is no question here of attributes, but of the law of numbers and measures, a law which rules everything in the universe, even the relations between human reason and the supreme reason.

But this trinitarian conception, so obscure, so incomprehensible, had a great advantage in the eyes of the Church, for it permitted them to make of Jesus Christ a God. It gave to the great Spirit which she called the Founder, an authority and a prestige which assured her authority. That is the secret of its adoption by the Council of Nicea, after discussions and quarrels which agitated three centuries. These discussions only ceased by the proscription of the Arian bishops, ordered by the Emperor Constance, and the banishment of Pope Liberius, who had refused to sanction the decision of the Council. 5

The Divinity of Christ, rejected by three Councils, is proclaimed in these terms, in 325, by that of Nicea: "The Church of God, Catholic and Apostolic, anhatematises those who say that there was a time when the Son did not exist, or that He did not exist before having been begotten."

This declaration is in direct contradiction to the views of the Apostles and Evangelists, who all believed the Son created by the Father. When the bishops of the fourth century proclaimed the Son equal to the Father, "begotten, not created" they gave the lie to Christ Himself, who said and repeated, "My Father is greater than I." To justify this assertion, the Church quotes certain words of Christ, which, if accurate, are wrongly understood and interpreted. For example, in Joh X. 33, it is said: "We stone thee .... because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God." The answer of Jesus destroys this accusation and reveals His inner thought. "Is it not written in your law; I said, Ye are gods?" 6

Every one knows that the ancient Latins and Orientals called "gods," all those who, in anyway whatever, raised themselves above the common level. 7 Christ preferred the name of Son of God to designate those who sought for and observed the divine teachings. He explains this in the following verse: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God" (Matt. V. 6). The Apostles gave the same meaning to this expression: "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, (that is to say, by a good and high spirit) they are the Sons of God" (Rom. VIII). Jesus confirms it in several circumstances. "Say ye of Him whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?" (John X. 36). 8

"Jesus said unto Him, why callest thou me good? None is good, save One, that is God" (Luke XVIII. 19).

"I can of my own self do nothing. I seek not my own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me" (John V. 30).

The following words are even more explicit: "But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God" (John VIII. 40).

"If ye loved me ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father, for my Father is greater than I" (John XIV. 28).

"Jesus said to Magdalene, Go to my brethren and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father and your Father, and to my God and your God" (John XX. 17).

Thus, far from claiming sacrilegiously for Himself the position of God, Jesus in all circumstances speaks of the Infinite One as a creature should speak of his Creator, or as a subordinate should speak of his Master.

The Apostles themselves only saw in Jesus a missionary, one sent from on high, doubtless a supreme spirit, by His knowledge and His virtues, but nevertheless a human spirit. Their attitude towrdas Him, their language prove it clearly. If they had considered Him as a God, would they not have prostrated themselves before Him, and spoken to Him on their knees? Whereas their deference towards Him and their respect never went beyond that due to a Master, an eminent man. It was the title of "Master" (Hebrew "rabbi") which they habitually used to Him, as the Scriptures prove to us. When they call Him Christ, they use it as equivalent of one sent of God.

"Peter answered, Thou art the Christ" (Mark VIII. 29). The opinion of the Apostles is explained and clearly shown in certain passages of the Acts. Acts II. 22. Peter thus addresses the crowd: "Ye men of Israel, hear these words. Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by Him in the midst of you."

We find the same idea expressed in Luke XXIV. 19: "Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people."

Thus, to the disciples of Jesus, as to all those who sutdy attentively and withou passion the problem of that marvellous life, the Christ, according to the expression which He applied to Himself, was but the "prophet" of God, that is to say the interpreter, the messenger of God, a spirit gifted with special faculties, with exceptional powers, but not superior to human nature. His clairvoyance, His inspiration, the gift of healing, which He possessed so largely, all these are found in greater or lesser degree and at different times, among other men.

We find these faculties today in our mediums, not grouped and united so as to form a powerful personality, like that of Christ, but divided up among many individuals. The cures of Jesus were not miracles, 9 but the application of a fluidic or magnetic power, which is possessed, more or less developed, by the healing mediums of our day. These powers are subject variations and intermittances which were felt by Chirst Himself, as is shown in these verses of Mark VI. 4, 5: "And Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin and in his own house. And He could there do no mighty work."

Those who have carefully observed the phenomena of spiritualism, of magnetism and suggestion, and sought out the cause from the effect, have all perceived the great analogy which existed between the cures wrought by Christ and those obtained by our modern practitioners. In the same way as He did, but with less power and success, the spiritualistic healers treat cases of obsession and of possession, and by the aid of passes and touches, by the laying on of hands, deliver the sick from the troubles caused by the influence of impure spirits, of those designated by the Scriptures as demons.

"When the even was come, they brought unto Him many that were possessed with devils, and He cast out the spirits with His word, and healed all that were sick" (Matt. VIII. 16).

The greater number of nervous diseases come from troubles caused by influences foreign to our fluidic organisation, or perispirit. Medicine which studies only the body, has not been able to discover the cause of these ells or their remedies, and is therefore powerless to cure them. The fluidic action of certain men, sustained by will, by prayer and the assistance of the higher spirits, can put a stop to these troubles by restoring to the fluidic body of the sufferer its normal vibrations, and constraining the departure of the bad spirits. It is this that Jesus did with such cases, and after Him, the Apostles and Saints.

       .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   

The knowledge spread among men by modern Spiritualism, enables us better to understand and define the high personality of Christ. He was a divine missionary, gifted with great powers, and an incomparable medium. He himself affirms this: "For I have not spoken of myself; but of the Father which sent me, He gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak" (John XII. 49).

To all the different races of humanity, at all great epochs of history, God sent his missionaries, superior spirits, who had attained by their efforts, or their merits, to the highest degree of spiritual hierarchy. We can follow the traces of their footprints. They towered above men, whom they endeavoured to direct towards intellectual heights. Heaven armed them for the fight they had to sustain, and gave them courage and power. Jesus was one among, and the greatest of these divine missionaries. Despoiled of the falso halo of His Divinity, he appears more imposing. His sufferings, His moments of weakness, His resignation, leave us cold as coming from a God. They touch and move us profoundly in a brother. Jesus is of all the children of men the most worthy of admiration. He is great when He teaches on the mountain, among the humble of the earth. He is still greater on Calvary, when the shadow of His cross is cast over the world, in the hour of His suffering.

The passage of Jesus on earth, His teachings and His example, have left ineffaceable traces, and His influence will be felt through the ages to come. Today, He still presides over the destinies of the globe on which He lived, loved and suffered. Raised by His sacrifice to the rank of spiritual governor of this world, it is under His occult direction, and with His help that is taking place this new revelation, which under the name of modern spiritualism, is re-establishing His doctrine and giving back to men the sentimento of their duty, and the knowledge of their nature and their destiny.
   
1 "Histoire de l'Eglise Gallicane," vol. I. p. 84
2 "Hist. Eccl.," book IV. 6.
3  Pére de Longueval. "Histoire de l"Eglise Gallicane," I. 84.
4  Le Maistre de Lacy -  "Commentaires de St Paul," I. 3, 22-29.
5  For details see "Spirite et Chrétien," by E. Bellemare, p. 212.
6 These words apply to the following passage from the Psalms 1 XXXII. V. 6: "I have said, Ye are gods, and all of you are the children of the Most High."
7 See note 8.
8  If, in His parabolic language, Jesus sometimes calls Himself the Son of God, He very much oftener calls Himself the Son of man, which latter expression is found seventy-six times in the Gospels.
9 What are called miracles are merely phenomena produced by the action of unknown forces which science will discover in time. Miracles, as a derogation of natural laws, are impossible. By the violation of these laws, disorder and confusion would reign in the world, and God cannot have established laws to violate them. It would be a fatal example to give us, for why should God punish us for violating a law, which He Himself, Author of the law, had set aside?


CHAPTER VII

THE DOGMAS (CONTINUED), THE SACRAMENTS, WORSHIP

ORIGINAL sin is the fundamental dogma on which reposes the whole edifice of Christian Dogmas. The idea is true at bottom, but false in form and distorted by the Church. True in this sense that man suffers from the intuition which clings to him, of the sins committed in his previous lives, and of the consequences they entail on him. But this suffering is personal and merited; none is responsible for the faults of others, if he has not participated in them. Presented in its dogmatic aspect, original sin, whinc punishes all Adam's posterity, that is to say, all humanity, for the disobedience of the firs couple, to save them afterwards by a much greater iniquity, the immolation of a righteous man, is an outrage to reason and to morality in their most essential principles, Goodness and Justice. It has done more to drive man away from God than all the attacks and all the criticisms of philosophy.

It is impossible to attempt, with impunity, to separate, in man's thought and conscience, the idea of God from that of Justice. Such an attempt throws the mind into confusion, and provokes a mental process, which inevitably ends in the ruin of both ideas. And it is the idea of God which has come near to perishing, for man can only see in God the highest personification of justice, of wisdom, and of love; all perfection must be united in the Eternal.

Man has lost the precise memory of his sinful past, but has preserved the vague impression of it. From that has come this conception of original sin, and its necessary expiation, whihc we find in a number of religions. From this erroneous conception have followed those of the fall, the redemption by the blood of Christ, the mysteries of the reincarnation, of the Virgin Mother, of the immaculate conception, in a word the whole scaffolding of Catholicism.

All these dogmas constitute a veritable negation of divine reason and justice, if one takes them literally, as the Church commands, and in their material sense.


It is not possible to admit that God created man and woman, on the condition that they should not gain knowledge. It is even more impossible that He should, for one act of disobedience, have condemned their posterity and the whole human race, to death and to hell.


"What would we think," says, with reason, E. Bellemare, "of a judge who condemned a man on the pretext that thousands of years before, one of his ancestors had committed a crime?" Yet such is the odious role which Catholicism attributes to the supreme Judge, to God. It is thus that is justified the indifference, and indeed, the hatred, which many people feel for the idea of God. It explains, though it does not excuse the vehement accusation of a celebrated writer: "God is evil."

If one considers the dogma of original sin, and the fall, as what it really is, a myth, an oriental legend, such as is found in all the antique cosmogonies; if one dissipates these chimeras, immediately the whole edifice of dogmas and mysteries collapses. What then will remain of Christianity, will be asked? There will remain all that is really great, living and rational, all that is capable of elevating and strengthening humanity.


Let us take up again our examination. The sovereignty of God, the theologians tell us, manifests itself by predestination and by redemption. God being the absolute sovereign, His will is the final and decisive cause of all that is accomplished in the universe. Augustine is the author of this dogma, which he establishes in his fight against the Manicheans, partisans of two opposing principles, good and evil, and against Pelagius, who insisted on the rights of human liberty. But Augustine borrows to support his doctrine, the authority of St Paul, the true creator of the doctrine of predestination, whose conclusions, not at all convincing to us, are to be found in the ninth chapter of Romans.

According to St Paul, whose theory has been adopted successively by Augustine, by the Reformers of the sisteenth century, by Jansenius, Pascal, etc., man does nothing for his salvation by his own works, as his nature is invincible evil.

This fatal inclination to evil is the result of the fall of the first man, and the corruption therefrom extending to all humanity, this corruption having become the inheritance of all the sons of Adam. It is by conception that the sins of the fathers are transmitted to their children. The Christian Churches do not seem to see, by this monstruous affirmation, that they make themselves the allies of materialism, which proclaims the same theory under the name of heredity.

All men, lost through Adam's sin, were given over to eternal damnation, if God, in His mercy, had not found a means of saving them. That means was redemption. The son of God became man. In his earthly life, He accomplished the will of His Father and satisfied His justice by offering Himself as a sacrifice for the salvation of all.

This dogma demonstrates the impossibility of the faithful being saved by the exercise of their free will, or by their own merits, for there is no free will before the sovereignty of God, and salvation is only by special grace accorded by God to His elect. By following out this argument to its logical conclusion, one can say: It is God who draws the elect to Himself; it is God who hardens the sinner. All is done by divine predstination. Then Adam did not sin of his own free will. It is God, the absolute sovereign, who prodestined him to fall.

This dogma has such deplorable results, that Calvin himself, who affirmed it with all its consequences, calls it, in speaking of the men predestined to eternal damnation, a "horrible decree" (decretum horribile). "But God has spoken," he adds, "and reason must submit." God has spoken! But how and when has He spoken? In obscure texts - the work of troubled imaginations. And to impose such views, to force belief in them, Calvin did not hesitate to employ violence. The stake of Servet proves that to us.

Terrible logic, which, proceeding from wrongly understood truths, loses itself in its own sophistry and is compelled to resort to fire and sword to decide intricate questions, and elucidate a confusion created by ignorance and passion.

"How," replies Pelagiuns to Augustine, "does God pardon us our sins and attribute to us those of our neighbours?"

There is, says St. Paul, one God, and one Mediator between God and man, the man, Christ Jesus (1 Tim. II. 5). Mediator, that is intermediary, medium, connection between God and humanity. That is Jesus. Mediator and not Redeemer; for the idea of redemption will not stand examination. It is contrary to divine justice and to the majestic order of the universe. Among the worlds rolling through space, ours is not the only place of suffering. There are other abodes of woe where souls, captives of matter, learn as here to comquer their vices and to acquire the qualities which will facilitate their entrance into happier worlds.

If the sacrifice of Jesus was necessary to save our earthly humanity, God owes the same succour to all other suffering races. But the member of inferior worlds where material passions predominate being unlimited, the sons of God would be condemned to endeless sufferings and sacrifices. Such a hypothesis is inadmissible. By His sacrifice, other theologians say, Jesus "conquered death and sin, for death is the wages of sin and a fearful disorder in creation." 1

Nevertheless, we die as much since Christ's coming as before it. Death, considered by certain Christians as a consequence of sin and its punishment, is but a natural law and a transformation necessary to the progress and elevation of the soul. It cannot therefore be and element of discord in the universe. To judge it after that fashion is to insult divine wisdom. It is thus that starting from an erroneous point of view, the Churchmen have arrived at the strangest conclusions.

When they state that, by His death Jesus offered Himself to God as a sacrifice for the ransom of man, is it not equivalent, for those who believe in His Divinity, to saying that He offered Himself to Himself? And from what did He save man? Not from the pains of hell, for we are told daily that those who die in a satate of mortal sin are comdemned to everlasting torment.

The word sin only expresses a confused idea. Any violation of the law brings with it a moral lowering, a revolt of conscience which is the cause of suffering, and of diminution of animistic perception. Thus man punishes himself. God does not intervene, He cannot either be injured or offended, for God is the Infinite and the Absolute, and no creature can cause Him a hurt.

If the sacrifice of Jesus has ransomed man from sin, why continue to baptise? This redemption, in any case, can only extended to Christians, who have knwon and accepted the doctrine of the Nazarene. It therefore leaves out of its sphere of action the greater portion of humanity. Even today, there are on earth many millions of men who live outside of all Christian Churches, in ignorance of their laws, deprived of that teaching without the observance of which, we are told, "there is no salvation." What are we to think of views so opposed to the true principles of justice and of love which govern the world?

No, the mission of Christ was not to wash out in His blodd the sin of mankind. The blood even of a God, can ransom no one. One must ransom oneself, save oneself from ignorance and sin. It is this that the spirits proclaim by the thousand in all points of the world. Christ descended from the bright spheres above to show to man the path that leads to God. He came to teach us to love, to suffer, to work for our own elevation and for that of humanity. Others, before Him, pointed out to men the path of right and of virtue. No other did so with that exquisite gentleness, that deep tenderness which characterises the teaching of Christ. No other taught as He did the love of the modest and hidden virtues. In this is the power, the mortal grandeur of the Gospels; in this is the vital element of Christianity, bowed down as it is under the load of curious dogmas which have been heaped upon it.

The dogma of eternal torments claims our attention. A powerful weapon in the hands of the priests, during the ages of faith, a menace always suspended over the heads of men, it is for the Church an incomparable means of dominion.

From whence comes this conception of Satan and of hell? Solely from the false ideas of God that the past has bequeathed to us. All primitive humanity believed in the gods of evil, in the powers of darkness, and this beliefe translated itself into fearful legends and terrifying images, which were handed down from generation to generation, and inspired a great number of religious myths. The mysterious forces of nature, in their manifestations, struck terror into the hearts of the early races. All around them, in the shadows, they seemed to see threatening forms ready to seize on them. These evil powers became personified and individualised by man, and thus he created the gods of evil. And these old traditions, the heritage of vanished races, are still found in the religious of today.

From them we get Satan, the eternal rebel, the eternal enemy of good, more powerful than God Himself, since he reigns as master over the world: souls created for happiness, mostly fall under his dominion. Satan, cunning and perfidy personified, and hell with its refined tortures:- their very image maddens simple souls.

It is thus that in the dominion of thought, mand has substituted for the pure light of reason that God had given him as a sure guide, the chimeras of his own troubled imagination.

It is true that in our sceptical and scoffing day, the devil is not much believed in, but nevertheless the priests continue to teach the existence of both him and of hell. From time to time we may hear from the pulpit a vivid description of the torments awaiting the damned. The Church continues to prescribe science and knowledge, and to introduce the devil everywhere, even into the domain of modern psychology. She threatens with eternal flames all men who seek to free themselves from a "Credo" that their reason and their conscience refuse to accept. It is thus, that, in their hands, the Gospel of love has become an instrument of terror.

But is it not enough to reflect a moment, to consider the divine scheme, in order to reject all belief in the devil? How can we admit that the centre of supreme God and Beauty, the everlasting source of tenderness and of mercy, should have created such a hideous and evil-working being? How can we believe that God has given to this being, along with the knowledge of good and evil, all power over the world, and that He should have delivered into his hands, an easy prey, the entire human family?

No! God cannot have created the immense majority of His children to damn them, to give them over to the eternal woe; God cannot have given such power to the one who would most abuse it, the most perverse, the wickedest one. Such a thought is impossible, is unworthy of a soul which believes in the justice and the goodness of the Creator. To admit Satan an an eternal hell, is to insult the Divinity. It can be onlu one of two things, either God foresaw the result of His creation, and, in executing it notwithstanding, made Himself the torturer of His creatures; or else He did not forsee this result, in which case He has not foreknowledge, he is as fallible as His creations, and therefore, in proclaiming the infallibility of the Pope, the Church is putting him above God. It is by such doctrines that the world is peopled with sceptics and materialists. This is what the Roman Church has done, and she bears a grave responsibility.

As to the chastisements reserved for sinners, to ensure the accomplishment of the law of divine justice, it is not needful to seek imaginary ones.

If we look around us we see on all sides, on this earth, trouble lying in wait for us. It is not necessary to go out of this world to find sufferings proportioned to all faults, expiatoru conditions for all the guilty. Why seek for hell in fanciful regions? Hell is around us. What is the real meaning of the word hell? Inferior, or lower, place; this earth is certainly one of the inferior worlds of the universe. The fate of man here below is often hard enough, his sufferings great enough, without increasing them by fantastic conceptions of the future. Such views are an outrage agains God. There cannot be eternal pains, but only temporary ones, according to the necessities of the law of progress and evolution. The principle of successive reincarnations is more just than the notion of an eternal hell; it realises the justice and harmony of the universe. It is during renewd and painful existences that the guilty one expiates past faults. The destiny of each one of us is woven on the loom of our good and bad actions; and thus every one prepares his own heaven or hell.

The soul, in the early part of its evolution, shut into the circle of earthly lives, hesitating, uncertain, tossed about between various attractions, and ignorant of the great destiny awaiting it and of the aim of creation, wanders feebly, ruled by passions and carried on the materialistic currents which surround it. But little by little, by the development of its psychic forces, of its knowledge, of its will, the soul arises, throws off the baser influences and soars towards divine regions.

The time will come when evil will no more be the condition of life here, when men, purified by suffering, and by the long education of the centuries, will leave the paths of darkness to advance towards the eternal light. The various races, united by the bonds of a close brotherhood and a deep affection, will advance from progress to progress, from perfection to perfection, towards the great centre, and supreme end, which is God, and thus accomplish the object of the Father, who willed not the loss, but happiness of all His children.

The principal argument used by the advocates of the theory of hell is that the offence of finite man, against an infinite God, becomes thus an infinite offence, and merits an eternal punishment. But all mathematicians will tell us that the relation of a finite quantity to the infinite is nil. One could turn the argument round, and say that man, ignorant and finite, cannot offend the infinite, and that his offence is therefore nonexistent as regards the latter. He can only hamr himself, by retarding his elevation and drawing down on himself the suffering which each guilty act engenders.

Are the chief of the Church really convinced of the existence of an eternal hell; or do they rather see in the idea an illusory scarecrow, but a necessary rod for the government of men? One might think so on examining the following words of St. Jerome, the translator of the Vulgate:- "These are the motives of those who insinuate that after pains and torments, there will be relief which must be carefully hidden at present from those for who fear is salutary, so that, fearing the torment, they may not sin" (Quæ nunc abscondenda sunt ab his quibus timor est utilis, dum supplicia reformidant, peccare desidant). 2

It is true that St Jerome did not hesitate to quote St Mathew as saying "eternal fire, eternal torment." But the Hebrew words thus translated do not seem to have the meaning given to them by the latins. The word "eternal" should not apparently be taken literally, but only as one of those emphatic expressions so common to the Orientals. How many promises supposed to be eternal, made to the Hebrews by their chiefs, have only had a restricted realisation. Where is that land that the Hebrews were to possess eternally (in eternum)? (Liv. XXV. 46). Where are those stones of the Jordan, which God announced should be to His people an eternal monument (Joshua IV. 7)? Where is that eternal alliance concluded with the house of David (2 Kings XXIII. 5)? Where are those Levites chosen to servo God eternally (1 Chron. XV. 2)? Where is that line of Solomon, which was to reign eternally over Israel (1 Chron. XXII. 16)? And so many of the same kind of promises? In all these cases, the word "eternal" seems to mean "of long duration."

There was one who said, "it is not the will of God that the least of these little ones should perish." These words are confirmed by those of the Apostles; "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. II. 4). "God, who is the Saviour of all men" (1 Tim. IV. 10). "God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Pet. III. 9). Several of the fathers of the Church speak in the same way. First comes the Master, Origen, then St Clement of Alexandria, who says: "Christ the Saviour finally accomplishes the salvation of all, not only of a few privileged ones. The sovereign Master has arranged everything, in general and in detail so that this final end should be attained" (taken from the "Critical examination of the Christian religion," by patice Laroque). The words quoted are in Greek.

Then comes St Gregory of Nicea, who also pronounces himself most positively against the eternity of hell; (quoted from the same source as the above) "It is necessary that the immortal soul should be purified of its stains and cured of its sickness. The trials of earth ar intended for this purpose, which is accomplished after death, when it has been unfinished in this life. When God afflicts the sinner, it is not in a spirit of hatred or of vengeance; He wishes to bring back the soul to Himself, the fountain of all joy. The fire of purification lasts only a reasonable time, and the only object of God is to make all men participate in the good which constitutes His essence." From that came the idea of purgatory, a middle course adopted by the Church, which hesitated before the enormity of eternal sufferings, applied to certain slight faults. Purgatory, in most cases, is this earthly life and its trials. The early Christians are quite aware of this. The Church of the Middle Ages put aside that explanations, which would have entailed the affirmation of the plurality of lives of the soul, and the ruin of the institution of "indulgences," that source of great profit to the Roman Pontiffs. We know what abuses came from this.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .

In reality, Satan is only a myth. Satan is the symbol of evil. But evil is not an eternal principle co-existent with good. It will pass. Evil is the transitional state of beings undergoing evolution.

There is neither lacuna nor imperfection in the universe. The divine work is harmonious and perfect. Man sees only a fragment of it, but he nevertheless tries to judge it with his restricted perceptions. Man in his present life, is but a dot in time and space. To judge creation, we should have to embrace it in its entirety, to measure the chain of worlds which we are to traverse, and the succession of existences which await us in future ages. This vast whole escapes our conception, and from this fact come our errors and the infirmity of our judgment.

Almost always, what we call evil is only suffering; but suffering is necessary, for by it alone we arrive ate comprehension; man learns to differentiate, and to analyse his sensations.

The soul is a spark from the eternal creative centre. It is through suffering that it attains to its full brilliancy, and the full consciousness of itself. Pain is the shadow which makes us appreciate the light. Without the darkness of night, should we see the stars? Pain breaks the chain of material fate, and opens to the soul a way to higher life.

From the physical point of view, evil and suffering are often relative and purely conventional. Sensations vary infinitely according to the person; agreeable to some, they are painful to others. There are very different conditions in the world; where everything would be painful to us, other men live comfortably.

If we go outside of the narrow circle in which we live, evil does not appear to us any longer as a fixed cause, an immutable principle, but as a passing effect, varying according to the individual, and changing and lessening as he advances towards perfection. Man, ignorant at the beginning of his career, must develop his intelligence and his will by constant effort. In his struggle with nature, his energy grows and his moral force increases. It isowing to this struggle that progress is made, that humanity ascends, step by step, degree by degree, towards the good and the ever better.

If man ha been created happy and perfect, he would have remained lost in the divine perfection, he would never have individualised the spiritual principle in him. There would have been nither work, effort, nor progress in the universe; nothing but immobility and inertia. The evolution of beings would have been replaced by a dull and monotonous perfection; the Catholic Paradise. Under the lash of necessity, under the goad of want and pain, man moves, advances, elevates himself, and from life to life, from progress to progress, succeeds in imprinting on the world the seal of his intelligence and his dominion.

The same applies to moral evil. As in the case of physical evil, it is only a passing aspect, a transitory form of universal life. Man does wrong through ignorance, through wekness, and his actions recoil on himself. Evil is due to the struggle between the lower forces of matter and the higher forces whichn constitute his thinking self, his true self. But from evil and suffering will emerge, some day, happiness and virtue. When the soul has conquered the material influences, it will be for it as if the evil hand never existed.

It is therefore not hell which fights against God, it is not Satan who is casting his nets over the world. No, it is human sould which is seeking its way in the dar, trying to affirm its growing personality, and, after many faintings, falls, and uprisings, it will conquer its vices, and attain moral force and true courage. It is thus that slowly, progress is accomplished, and good realized.

The empire of evil consists of the dark and inferior worlds, of the crowd of backward souls who tread the ways of error and crime; turning ever in the circle of material existences; and, under the lash of pain and trial, emerging slowly from this abyss of selfishness and misery to become illuminated by the rays of science and of charity. Satan is ignorance, matter, and its depressing influences, God is knowledge and sublime light, the reflection from which illuminates the human conscience.

The modern spirit will free itself more and more from the prejudices of the past. Life will lose the fierce aspect of the fiery ages to become the peaceful and fruitful field in which man will work for the development of his faculties and his moral qualities. Already modern man feels awakening in him the consciousness of his role and of his value. Soon he will feel the ties which bind him to the universe, he will participate in its immense life, he will know himself to be a citzen of heaven. By his intelligence, by his soul, man will collaborate in the universal work; in his turn, he will become a creator, a workman of God.

The new revelation will teach him to know himself, to know the nature of the soul, its role and its destiny. It will show him the double power he possesses over the world of matter and the world of spirit. All the incoherences, all the aparent contradictions of the divine work will explain themselves to him. What he once called physical evil and moral evil, all that once appeared to him to be a negation of the good, the true, the beautiful, all this will unite in the lines of a grand and powerful work, in harmony with wise and profound laws. Man will see the fading away of that fearful dream, that nightmare of damnation; he will raise his soul towards the space filled by divine thought, whence descends the pardon for all sins, the ransom for all crimes, the consolation for all griefs:- the radiant space where reigns everlasting mercy.

The power of hell has vanished for ever, the reign of Satan has come to an end, and the soul freed from its terrors, will laugh at the phantoms which used to terrorize it.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .

Shall we speak of the resurrection-of-the-body dogma, according to which the atoms of our carnal body, dispersed among a thousand other bodies, must reunite one day, to form again our envelope and figure at the last judgement?

The laws of material evolution, the incessant circulation of life, the play of the molecules which pass in numberless currents from form to form, from organism to organism, render this theory untenable. The human body is constantly modifying itself; the elements which compose it renew themselves completely in less than seven years. Not one of the present atoms of our flesh will be here at our death, if we live a few years longer, and those which then constitute our body will be dispersed to the four winds of heaven.

Most of the Fathers of the Church understood it otherwise, for they knew of the existence of the perispirit, of the subtle, imponderable, fluidic body, which is the permanent envelope of the soul before, during, and after the earthly life. They called it the spiritual body. St Paul, Origen, and the Alexandrian Fathers, affirm its existence. In their opinion, the bodies of the angels and the elect were formed of this subtle element, and were incorruptible, free and supremely agile. 3


Therefore, they only attibuted the resurrection to this spiritual body, which resumes in its essential substance all the gross envelopes, all the perishable vestments which the soul has worn and then abandoned, during its perigrination through the worlds.

The perispirit, by penetrating with its energy all the temporary matter of earthly life, alone merits the name of body.

The question was thereby much simplified. This belief of the eartly Fathers in a spiritual body also threw much light on the problem of occult manifestations.

Tertulian says (De carne Christi, ch. VI.): "The angels have a body which is proper to them and can transform itself into human flesh; they can, for a time, show themselves to men and communicate visibly with them." If we extend to the spirits of the dead the powers which Tertulian ascribed to angels, we have the explanation of materialisations and apparitions.

On the other hand, if we consult the Sriptures attentively, we shall see that the gross sense in which the Church of today views the resurrection is not justified in them. We do not find the words, resurrection of the flesh, but rather "to rise again from among the dead" (a mortuis resurgere) and, in a more general sense the "resurrection of the dead" (resurrectio mortuorum). The difference is a grea one.

According to the texts, the resurrection, taken in a spiritual sense, is the re-birth from this life to the life beyond; it is the spiritualisation of the human form for those who are worthy of it, and not a chemical operation reconstituting material elements; it is the purifying of the soul and its perispirit, the fluidic mould in which the material body is formed for the time of its earthly life.

This is what the Apostle tried so hard to explain, 1 Cor. XV. 42:
4 "So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. It is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body."

A number of theologians adopt this interpretation, giving the resurrected bodies properties unknown to carnal matter, making them luminous, agile as spirits, subtle as ether and impassible.
5

Such is the true meaning of the resurrection of the dead as understood by the first Christians. If we see, at a later date, in certain documents, and especially in the apocryphal symbol of the Apostles, the term resurrection of the flesh appear, it is always in the sense of re-incarnation, that is, return to material life, the act by which the soul takes on a new body in the flesh to continue its earthly existences.
6

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .

Christianity, under the triple aspect in which it appears in our day, Roman Catholicism, Orthodox Protestantism, and the Greek religion, was not constituted complete and in a moment, as some people seem to think, but slowly through the ages, in the midst of blind wanderings, desperate struggles, and profound disruptions. Each dogma, built on the top of another, affirmed what had been denied in earlier times. In the nineteenth century itself have been promulgated two of the most contested dogmas, those of the Immaculate Conception and the Infallibility of the Pope. Of these a Catholic of great influence says: "They inspire little veneration when one has seen how they were made."
7

Nevertheless, this work of the centuries, out of which ecclesiastic tradition has made an unitelligible doctrine, might become the vehicle of a reasonable religion, in accord with science and common sense, if, instead of taking each dogma literally, we would only see in it an image, a transparent symbol. By separating the Christian dogma from its supernatural character, we can almost always find in it a philosophical idea, a substantial teaching.

Thus, for example, the Trinity, defined by the Church as "one only God in three Persons" would become only a conception of the Divinity under three different aspects; the Law, living and changeless, God; Reason, or eternal wisdom, the Son; Love, the powerful creator and regenerator, the Holy Spirit. The incarnation of Christ, would be the divine wisdom descending to earth to take form there, to manifest the type of moral perfection offered as an examplo to man.

One could thus explain in a rational, simple and clear manner, all the old dogmas of Christianity. As to the modern dogmas, we can only see in them the product of priestly ambition. They were all promulgated to render more complete the servitude of souls.

But the superior laws and destinies of the soul are now revealed to us by voices of greater authority than those of the thinkers of antiquity; namely buy those of the beings who inhabit space, and live that fluidic life which will one day be ours. This revelation will serve as a basis for the beliefes of the future, for it brings a splendid demonstration of that "beyond" for which the soul thirsts, of that spiritual world to which it aspires, though hitherto presented by religion in such incomplete and vague forms.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

The rational explanation of the dogmas can be extended to the Sacraments, institutions worthy of veneration if they are considered as symbolic figures, as means of religious discipline, and not taken literally, in the sense imposed by the Church.

What we have said of original sin leads us to consider baptism as a simple ceremony of initiation, for water is powerless to cleanse a soulf of its stains.

Confirmation, or the laying on of hands, is the act of transmission of fluidic gifts, of the power of the Apostle to another person. That power can only justify itself by merits acquired in previous existences. Penitence and the remission of sins gave rise to confession, at first public, and made directly to God; Then auricular, in the Catholic Church, and made to the priest, who, thus made sole arbiter, judged this an indispensable means to enlighten himself and discern the cases in which absolution was deserved. But can he ever decide with certainty? The contrition of the penitent, the Church tells, is necessary. And how is it to be ascertained if this contrition is real and sufficient? The decision of the priest is made from the avowal of sin; can he ever be sure that this avowal is complete?

If we consult all the texts on which the institution of confession rest,
8 we shall only find that man is to admit the wrong he does to his neighbour, and that he is to confess his sins before God. From these texts we gather that the individual conscience is sacred, that it has to do directly with God. Nothing in them justifies the pretension of the priest to pose as a judge. What does St Paul say in speaking of the communion and of those who are worthy of it? I Cor. XI. 28: "Let a man examine himself." He is silent as regards confession, which is considered in our day indispensable in those circumstances.

St John Chrysostom, in a similar case, exclaims: "Reveal your life to God, confess your sins to God, confess them to your Judge and pray Him, if not aloud, at least mentally, that He should pardon you." (Homily XXXI. on the Epistle to the Hebrews).

Auricular confession was never practised in the early times of Christianity; it does not come from Jesus Christ, but from man.

As to the remission of sins, deduced from these celebrated words of Christ: "What is bound in earth will be bound in heaven"; it would appear that these words applied rather to the habits, to the material tastes contracted on earth by the spirit in its terrestrial life, which hold it by fluidic chains to the earth after death.

Then as to the Eucharist or real presence of the body and blood of Jesus Christ, the consecrated wafer, the sacrifice of the cross renewed every day on thousands of Catholic altars, at the bidding of the priest, and the absorption by the faithful of the living and bleeding body of Christ, according to the formula of the catechism of the Council of Trent: "It is not only the body of Jesus Christ which is contained in the Eucharist, with all that constitutes a real body, such as the bones and the nerves; it is Jesus Christ entire."

Whence comes this mystery presented by the Church? It is from the words of Jesus, taken literally, when they had only a purely symbolic meaning. Christ evidently was only speaking of His spiritual body. The communion between man and the divine nature is made by the moral union with God. All material ceremonies are vain, if they do not correspond to a high state of thought, and pureness of heart.

Religious worship is a legitimate homage rendered to the All-Mighty; it is the elevation of the soul towards its Creator, the natural and essential relation of man to God. The practises of this worship are useful; the aspirations it awakens, the consoling thoughts it brings, are a support for man, and a protection agains his passions. But to reach the heart and spirit of the believer, worship must be sober in its manifestations, and renouce a display of material riches which cannot but interfere with prayer and thought. It must do away with puerile superstitions. Simple and grand in its forms, it must give the impression of divine majesty.

In older times, man, carried away by religious fanaticism, the result of ignorance, offered bloody sacrifices to the Divinity, and the priest had built up an edifice of terrifying ceremonies.

Times have changed, intelligence has been developed, customs have become more gentle; but priestly oppression is still with us. It is evident in those rites in which the spirit of God is veiled and hidden, in the ceremonial the luxury of which captivates the senses, and turns men's thoughts away from the high object they should pursue. It is necessary, it is urgent, that the worship of God should become once more simple, austere in its principles as in its manifestations.

But the Roman Church persists in forms borrowed from ancient oriental religions. These forms do not speak to the heart, and become to the faithful a mere routine of habit, without influence on their moral life. She persists in still addressing God, after two thousand years, in a language no longer understood, with words which the lips murmur, but the sense of which does not penetrate to the brain.

All its practices tend to turn man away from profound study or reflection, and to develop in him the contemplative life. The long prayers, the ceremonial appealing to the senses, keep up illusions, and accustom thought to operate mechanically without the assistance of reason.

All the forms of worship of the Roman Church are a legacy of the past. The ceremonies, the chants, the processions, the lustral water, all come from paganism. From Brahminism, they have borrowed the altar, the sacred fire that burns there, the bread and wine that the priest consecrates to the Divinity. From Buddhism, they have copied the celibacy of the clergy and the sacerdotal hierarchy.

A slow substitution has taken place, in which one finds vestiges of long vanished beliefs. The pagan gods become demons. The divinities of the Phœnicians and Assyrians, Baal-Zebond (Beel-zebub), Astaroth, Lucifer, were transformed into infernal powers. The demons
9 of Platonism, which were familiar spirits, became devils. From heroes, personages revered in Gaul, in Italy, in Greece, they made saints. They kept up the religious feasts of the ancients, giving them a very slightly different form, as, for instance, the feast of the dead. Everywhere was grafted to the antique worship a new worship, reproducing the old under another name. Even the Christian dogmas we find in India and in Persia.

The Zend-Avesta
10
like the Christian doctrine, contains the theory of the fall and the redemption, that of good and bad angels, of the first disobedience of man and the need of salvation by grace. Under this mass of material forms and worn-out superstitions, this motley inheritance of vanished religions which constitute modern Christianity, it is hard to perceive the thought of the founder. Surely, the authors of the Gospels did not foresee these varied forms of dogma and worship. Nothing of the kind is found in the Scriptures. No one was ever less inbued with the sacerdotal spirit than Jesus, none ever held forms and outward practices of less account. In Him all was sentiment, elevation of thought, purity of heart and simplicity.

On this point, His successors have diverged widely from Him. Prompted by the material instincts which dominate humanity, they have loaded down the Christian religion with pompous paraphernalia which has smothered the original idea. But, sooner or later, the Master's thought, re-established in all its purity, will shine with a new lustre. Religious forms will pass, human institutions will crumble away, but the word of Christ will live eternally to vivify souls and regenerate society.


1
"Jesus Christ, His time, His life, His work," by de Présensé, p. 654. The same opinion is found in several Catholic authors.
2 Works of St Jerome. Edition 1704., vol. I. 3.
3 See note 9.
4
See also 1 Cor. XV. 52-56, translated from the Greek. Phil. III. 21; St John V. 28, 29; St Ignatius. Epistle to the Trallians, IX. 1.
5
See note 9.
6 Abbé Petit. La Renovation Religieuse, p. 53 1-8.
7 Père Marchal. L'Esprit Consolateur, p. 24.
8 Matt. III. 6; Luke XVIII. 13; James III. 16; I John I. 8,9; II. 12.
9 The word "demon" means spirit.
10 "La Science des Religions," p. 222. Emile Burnof.




CHAPTER VIII

THE DECADENCE OF CHRISTIANITY

Nineteen centuries have elapsed since the time of Christ, neneteen centuries of authority for the Church, twelve of them of absolute power. What, at the present time, are the consequences of her teachings? Has Christianity fulfilled its mission of explaining and spreading the teaching of Christ, of forming by them a better and happier state of society? Has this great work been accomplished? "The tree is judged by its fruits," say the Scriptures. Look at the tree of Christianity. Does it bend under the load of fruits of hope and of love?

The tree is stil gigantic doubtless, but among its branches, how many have been cut and mutilated, how many have dried up, how many have remained unfruitful. The pilgrim of life stops, exhausted, under its shade, but it is in vain that he seeks there rest for his soul, confidence and the moral force necessary for him to pursue his way. He longs for a deeper rest, and more satisfying refreshment; instinctively, his eyes scan the horizon for something better.

The faith in immortality is very feeble in many of those who call themselves disciples of Christ; often their hopes waver in the icy blast of scepticism. The faithful lay their dead in the coffin, and with every blow of the hammer, a heavy doubt falls crushingly on their hearts.

The priest feels his weakness; he knows that he is frail and subject to error, even as those he is supposed to guide; and if his material position and his dignity were not in question, he would admit his insufficiency and cease to be a blind leader of the blind. He who, knowing nothing of the future life and its true laws, sets himsilf up as a leader to others, becomes that blind man spoken of in the Scripture: "If the blind lead the blind they shall both fall into the ditch" (Matt. XV. 14).

Darkness reigns in the sanctuary. There is not a single bishop who appears to know as much about the conditions of life beyond the tomb, as the lowliest initiate of ancient times, or the most humble deacon of the early Church.

Whence comes this state of things? During twelve centuries the Church dominated and moulded the human soul and society as a whole, according to her will. All power was in her hands. All authority was in her or came from her. She reigned over souls and bodies; she reigned by book and by word, by fire and by sword. She was absolute mistress of the Christian world; there was no check, no limit to her power of action. What has she made of that world? She complains of its scepticism, of its corruption and vices! Does she not see that in accusing it, she accused himself, for it is her own work. The truth is that she is powerless to direct, to improve it. The sceptical and corrupt society of the eighteenth century was the direct work of her hands. The abuses, the excesses, and the errors of the priesthood engendered that social state. It was the impossibility of believing in the dogmas of the Church which drove man to doubt and to negation.

Materialism has thoroughly penetrated the social body. But whose fault is it? If man had found in religion, as it was taught him, the moral force, the consolation, and spiritual direction which he needed, would he have detached himself from these Churches, in whose powerful hands had rested the up-bringing of so many generations? Would he have ceased to believe, to hope, and to love?

The truth is that the teachings of the Church have not succeeded in satisfying the intelligence or the conscience. If at the height of her power, the Church could not regenerate humanity, how will she be able to do so today? Ah! perhaps if she would abandon her palaces, her riches, her luxurious and theatrical worship, her gold and purple; if, coarsely clad, crucifix in hand, the bishops and princes of the Church, renouncing their wordly goods, and becoming like Christ before them, sublime vagabonds, preached to the crowds the true Gospel of peace and of love; if such things could be, perhaps then mankind might believe in them once more. But the Roman Church does not appear anxious to act this part, and the spirit of Christ is leaving her more and more. There only remains an exterior form, under which is but the corpse of a grand idea.

The Christian Churches only live by what is left in them of evangelical morality; their conception of the world, of life, and of destiny, is but a dead letter. Indeed, what can one think or say of a teaching which forced men to belive, and affirm during centuries, the immobility of the earth, and the creation of the world in six days? What can one think of a doctrine which sees in the resurrection of the flesh the only means of giving back life to the dead? How can one answer a conception of life which consists in the belief that one day all the atoms of our body must come together again? With the new lights which, each day, come to illuminate the problem of survival, all this is but a childish dream.

It is the same with the idea of God. The gravest reproach that we can make to the Church, is that of having falsified and distorted the idea of God, and thereby having rendered it odious to many. The Roman Church has always laid emphasis on the fear of God. That was the sentiment especially necessary to her scheme of dominion with the semi-barbarous peoples with which she had to deal, but it was a dangerous one, for, after having long made slaves, it ends by making rebels. It drives man to hate a God  who has been shown to him only as the God of fearful and eternal chastisements, a God in whose name scaffolds and stakes are erected, in whose name blood has flowed in the torture chambers. From thence has come this violent reaction, this furious negation and bitter hatred of God the despot and tormentor, which finds expression in the cry, which echoes everywhere today, in our homes, in our public places, in our press:- "Neither God nor Master."

If we add the terrible discipline inflicted on the faithful by the Church in the Middle Ages, fastings, mortification, the continual fear of damnation, when a look, or word, or guilty thought, rendered them liable to the pains of hell, we shall understand what a sobre ideal, what a reign of terror was instituted through the world by the Church, driving people to renounce all that constitute civilisation and social life, and to think only of personal salvation, regardless of natural laws, which are also divine. If we would know God and approach Him, it is only by love that we can do so; it is love alone which vivifies and attracts. God is all love, and to understand Him, we must cultivate in ourselves that divine spark; we must cease to live for ourselves, and live in that divine region which embraces all creation. God is in every man who knows how to love. To love and cultivate the divine in ourselves and in humanity, this is the secret of all progress, of all elevation. This is why it has been said, "Love God above all things, and thy neighbour as thyself." It is thus the great Christians souls attained such sublime heights. It is by such means that St Vincent de Paul, St Francis d"Assisi and others, have been enabled to accomplish work which has called forth the wonder of ages. Their ardent charity was not inspired by the Catholic Dogmas.  It was from the Gopspels that those noble spirits drew the faith and love which animated them.

The conception of the world and of life shared the same fate as that of God. For long the Church imposed on the intelligence that old theory which made of the earth the most important and central body of the universe, and of the Sun and Planets her satellites, turning around her. The heavens were a solid vault, above it was throned the Eternal, surrounded by celestial armies; under the earth were the deep inferior places, the hells. The world, created six thousand years ago, was soon to be destroyed. This ending was a constante menace held over the head of mankind. With the end of the world was to coincide a terrible judgement, final and universal, at which the dead would rise from their tombs, clad in their carnal bodies, to appear before the tribunal of God. Modern astronomy has destroyed these conceptions. It has shown us that our globe is but a single unit in the great family of celestial bodies, that the vastness of the heavens is peopled by an infinite number of worlds. Everywhere the earths, suns, spheres in course of formation, of development or of decadence, tell us the marvels of an incessante eternal creation, in which the forms of life are multiplied, follow each other, and renew themselves. Among these worlds which roll in the immensity of spaces, our earth is but a grain of sand, an atom lost in infinity. This atom, the Church insists, is the only inhabited one. But science, philosophy, and the revelation of spirits, show us life appearing on the surface of these worlds, and elevating itself little by little, through slow transformations, towards an ideal of beauty and of perfection. Everywhere, peoples, races, innumerable humanities are pursuing their destinies in universal harmony.

The Church teaches that the first man appeared on the earth six thousand years ago, in a perfec state of happiness, from which he fell, by his own sin. Prehistoric anthropology puts back the existence of humanity to a much more distant epoch. It shows us man first in a savage state, from which he gradually emerged by a constant progression until he reached the present state of civilisation. This terrestrial globe was not created in six days; it is an organism which has developed gradually through the ages. In the layers which form its surface, geology show us the successive phases of its formation. Scientific observation, and patient and persevering study of the laws of life, have shown us the action of a will which has disposed everything on a predetermined plan. It is in virtue of this plan that each being possesses in itself its principle of existence, and rises by measured gradations, from form to form, from species to species, ever towards a more perfect type. Nowhere do we find traces of the arbitrary or the miraculous, but on all sides the action of wise and profound laws, the manifestation of a universal order, of a divine thought which leaves to each the liberty and the means to develop himself, by time, work and trials. The Church, though ruling and directing the world for so many centuries, has never understood the real laws of life, and her teachings and her explanations of them have always been erroneous. Free thought and science alone have at last brought her to acknowledge her errors on a number of points and to distinguish, in Christianity, what is essential truth from what is fiction and allegory.

The Church long considered as herectics the men of science, who proclaimed the movement of the earth. Galileo was coondemned to prison for teaching that the earth revolves.1The Irish monk Virgile was excomunicated by Pope Zacharie, because he affirmed the existence of the Antipodes.

Taking literally what was figuratively meant, the Church could not believe the world spherical, as several passages of the Scriptures seemed to indicate that it had four corners. Now, she declares that in speaking of the immobility of the earth in the centre of the universe, the Scriptures were but taking the point of view of antique ignorance, and she has accepted, in certain cases, the system of Galileo and of Descartes. But it has only come about after long hesitation, for the works of Galileo and of Copernicus were only taken off the Index in 1853. The Church has come gradually to consider as a simple fiction what used to be a dogma with her. On this point, it is therefore science which has helped to interpret the Bible more clearly.

It is the same with her view on creation. The great antiquity of our planet and its slow formation, established by science, were long condemned by the Church, as opposed to the story in Genesis. Today, she gives way under the pressure of geology, and sees only in this story a symbolic picture of the work of nature, developing through the ages, according to a divine plan.

Will she stop there? Will she not be forced to bow before history and exegesis as she has done before astronomy and geology? Will she not finally disengage the personality of Christ and His high moral mission from all the hypotheses established on His origin and His divine nature?

The Church, after having combated and denounced science, will be forced to take refuge behind her and assimilate all her discoveris if she intends to live on. Her century-old errors remain none the less as a testimony to her incapacity to attain for herself the knowledge of the universal laws. And one asks oneself, the Church having been so oftem mistaken in physical matters, which can be verified, what belief can we place in her in what concerns the mystical doctrines which have hitherto been outside of all verification.
Everything shows us that this part of her teaching is no less defective. Already, the manifestations of spirits of the dead, constantly on the increase, open up to us, in the life beyond, a new source of knowledge, which still further contributes to ruin the affirmations of dogma.

We can no longer believe in a world, a universe created from nothing, which God governs by miracles and by grace. Nor can we believe that life is merely a task of personal salvation, and work a shame and a punishment, with an eternal hell in perspective, or else a purgatory from which we can only escape through many well-paid-for prayers; or a dull and monotonous paradise, where we may be condemned to live without activity or object, for ever separated from those we have loved. We cannot believe in the sin of Adam falling on the whole of mankind, nor of its ransom by the immolation of a God upon a cross.

God, who is absolute justice, cannot desire either the damnation of a sinner, nor his salvation through the merits of a Saviour, but only through his own endeavours.

Unfortunately, the true conception of the world and of life so indispensable to the development and elevation of humanity, only belongs so far to a small minority. The masses wander through the paths of life, ignorant of the laws of nature, having for moral sustenance only the Catechism taught to children in all Christian countries, which is incomprehensible and leaves little impression upon the mind.

And yet it is of the greatest importance that men should have a correct idea of the object of existence; that all should know whence they come, what they are, whither they go, and how and why they should act.

The Church has always had the monopoly of imparting these ideas. She teaches them through the catechism. However insufficient, obscure, and out of date this instruction may be, in it has nevertheless until now lain the superiority of the Church over lay teaching; for the latter, it its hesitation or inability to give the child an exact idea of the relations of himself and the universe, with his neighbour, and with God, has put nothing in the place of this catechism. It thus gives the moral guidance of the people into the hands of an institution which represents an obsolete and worn-out ideal. It is true that we find in the new books of lay education, some pages given up to moral questions, to God and to the immortal soul, but practically these things are neglected. The teacher, finding it next to impossible to follow out the whole of a heavily-filled programme, and often himself without conviction in these matters, neglects or despises this essential part of his duty.

The catechism remains therefore the only means of moral education which can be said to be within the reach of all; and it is by it that the power of the Church perpetuates itself. But it is a teaching all on the surface, committed to memory, and not appealing to the heart and conscience. It cannot assist in developing the child's reasoning powers, or help him to resist the outside influences he will meet with.

When the poor man's child, early obliged to work for his living, and having no guide but this catechism, comes to lose belief in its teachings, he has nothing to fall back upon; incapable as he is of providing himself with an ideal, a high conception of life and its duties. Thus, this one weak tie being severed, he is an easy prey to materialism and negation, withou a weapon against the grossest appetites, and, in times of misery and want, without defence against the suggestions of suicide and depravity.

For a hundred years past, a breath of liberty has been passing over the world; thought has been throwing off its shackles; faith has diminished. But the Latin peoples still keep the imprint of the Catholic teaching which moulded them for twelve centuries. In political, financial and colonising work, the Catholic nations long showed themselves inferior to the Protestant, better prepared by their freer religious education, to exercise their own judgement. On the other hand, the Catholics excel in the arts and in letters, but is that a sufficient compensation? Catholic peoples, whose education has developed in them sentiment and imagination to the detriment of cold reason, give way easily to enthusiasm, adopt certain ideas without waiting for them to ripen, and pursue them with an ardour and exaggeration which often leads to failure; consequently we often see a Protestant nation succeed where a Catholic has failed. It is not with impunity that one can crush out of sight, for centuries, reason, that greatest faculty God has given man to guide him through the paths of destiny. By so doing, we prepare the decadence of a nation.

In all times, Catholicism has kept up a political party, working against the current of modern ideas. From this point of view, we may say that the Catholic religion develops a spirit of intolerance and resitance to progress, and keeps a nation in a state of discord and antagonism. Society is thus divided into two hostile camps, one with a forward tendency, and the other ever looking back towards the past, to the great detriment of prosperity and general peace.

The Roman Church, who has always associated herself with despotisms, when it has been to her interest, today calls for liberty. It would be a legitimate demand, if, by liberty, she did not mean privilege for herself; for she has never been reconciled to the spirit of liberty, which only began to manifest itself in the world when the power of the Church began to decline. The progress of the one has always been in exact proportion to the diminution of the other, whereas modern Protestants, accustomed by their religion to the use of liberty, have been able to apply it to civil and political life.

Even now, does not the Church condemn free thought as she once condemned free examination, as applied to the Scriptures? Does she not forbid her children to discuss or reason about religion? It is by this that we see how far the views of the Roman Church still differ from the principles of true Christianity. See what St Paul says: "Prove all things, hold fast that which is good" (1 Thess. V. 21). "Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Cor. III. 17).

The doctrine of Christ, as expressed in the Gospels, is one of liberty. This moral liberty and the sovereignty of conscience is repeated on almost all the pages of the New Testament.

The chiefs of the Church have put this out of sight, and have imposed unreasoning faith on man, thus making of the history of Catholicism the calvary of humanity.

They have forgotten that reason, - "this light," as says St John, "with which all men come into the world," - is a detached spark of the divine reason, differing from it only in power and extent, and that in obeying its laws, we are obeying God.

"Oh, Reason," says Fénélon, in one of his moments of profound intuition, "art thou not the God whom I seek?"

The right of thought is what is noblest and grandest in us. This right, the Church has always tried to prevent man from using. She has said to him: "Believe and do not reason. Remain ignorant, and lower thyself. Close thine eyes and receive the yoke." As well say at once: "Resign thy divine privilege and descend to the level of the beasts."

For reason, disdained by the Church, is the surest means which man has received from God to enable him to discover the truth; and to deny reason, is to deny God Himself, who is the source of it. It is not by the help of reason that man resolves all the problems of political and social life? Why therefore should he throw it aside when he examines the truths of religion, which he certainly cannot understand without its aid?

We have seen the consequences of our religious education in this life. Its influence often persists after death and prepares cruel surprises from credulous souls. How many Catholics, returning as spirits, have described to us, by means of mediumistic messages their anguish when, expecting as they did the promised rewards, and imbued with ideas of paradise and redemption, they found themselves instead in an empty, vast space, wandering for years in search of a chimerical felicity, and understanding nothing of their surroundings, which were so different from what they had been led to expect. Their restricted perceptions, their comprehension veiled by false doctrines and practices, did not enable them to understand or perceive the beauties of the fluidic universe.

And when, in their extra-terrestrial peregrinations, they meet those priests who conducted their religious education, and who have also returned to the spirit-state, the complaints and reproaches which they address to them meet only with troubled and anxious seeking, to which they themselves also are a prey.

Sad effects of a false teachning, which so ill-prepares the soul for the realities of its destiny.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

In the course of this study, we have several times compared the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church with those of Protestantism, and remarked on the superiority of the latter. Does it follow that we consider Protestantism as the most perfect of religious? Such is not our opinion.

Protestantism, in its teachings and in its worship, approaches nearer, it is true, to the simplicity of the eartly Christians. It does not put reason out of court as does Catholicism, but on the contrary, respects and uses it. Its ethics are pure, and its organisation without pomp and display. It suppresses priestly hierarchy, the worship of the Virginand Saints, pompous rites, long prayers, rosaries, amulets, in fact the whole puerile arsenal of Catholic devotion. The pastir is only a teacher of morals, who presides over the religious ceremonies, which are reduced to baptism, comunion, and preaching; to the celebration of marriages, to helping the poor, the sick and the dying. Such at least are the fundamental theories of Protestantism, but unfortunately here also the tendency today is to depart from smplicity.

Protestantism advocates the free study and interpretation of the Scriptures; by which it develops the judgment and favours instruction, which has always been considered so dangerous by the Roman Church. The Protestant therefore remains free and learns to govern himself, whereas the Catholic surrenders his reason and his liberty, to place them in the hands of the priest.

Nevertheless, however great the work of the Reformation of the sixteenth century, it is not sufficient for the needs of today. It has preserved too many unacceptable things from the mass of dogmas of the Middle Ages. For the authority of the Pope has been substituted that of a book; but the Bible, interpreted with freedom, cannot be considered as of divine inspiration.2  Conscience which have escaped from the yoke of Rome, cannot place themselves under that of a work which, though doubtless worthy of respect and consideration, is of purely human origin and strewn with fictions and allegories, under which the philosophical thought is often hidden and sometimes lost.

Luther proclaimed the divinity of Christ, His miraculous birth and His resurrection; Calvin taught the doctrines of the Trinity and of predestination. The articles of the Augsburg Confession and of the Declaration of la Rochelle affirm original sin, the ransom through the blood of Christ, eternal torment, and the damnation of infants dead without baptism.

Among Protestants, even the orthodox, how many today subscribe to these affirmations and accept as a whole the Apostle's Creed, read in all the Churches, of which the Apostles had no knowledge. Alongside of orthodox Protestantism, a great party has been formed under the name of liberal Protestantism, which refuses to accept the dogmas we have enumerated, and contents itself with reconising the moral grandeur of Jesus, and of His teachings. This party counts within its ranks the most enlightened minds, who are animated by a most praiseworthy spirit of tolerance and a great love of progress, men who are worthy of all sympathy and admiration. But the Liberal Protestants have placed themselves in a delicate and falso position. They persist in remaining in the Feformed Church, after having rejected, one by one, all its points of doctrine, and its articles of faith.  They have participated largely in those considerable researches of which we spoke at the beginning of this book, researches undertaken on the origin of Christianity and the authenticity of the holy books. They have submitted to a rigorous criticism all the documents on which the Christian tradition is founded. The application of the principle of free examination has led them to constant research, in consequence of which the dogmas, the miracles and a number of historical facts have lost all credence in their eyes. One thing only has remained after this examination, the Christian moral teaching. The liberal Protestants have come to place the principle of liberty and the rights of conscience above the unity faith, and in so doing, they have broken the religious bonds which united them to the Reformed Church. They are no longer really Protestants, but rather Christian free-thinkers.

It is therefore an anomaly to see them practising in all its forms, a worship which is so little in accord with their own aspirations. It seems as if they could do better, in their religious assemblies, than to read and comment on the Bible only, to sing psalms to worn-out tunes, to speak of a "strong and jealous God," or to forbid the inhabitants of Paris, as is done every Sunday in the Church of the Oratory, to "covet their neighbour's ox or his ass." Such a form of worship and such exhortations might suit the pastoral peoples of antiquity, but they cannot suply the needs of modern Christians.

To resume, Protestantism, as a whole, may be considered superior Catholicism in as far as it approaches nearer to the real thought of Christ. But it is still too much attached to the form and the letter to satisfy the needs of the modern spirit.

It would do a good work in abandoning the legacy left by the Reformation, to attach itself entirely to the evangelical spirit. The spirit of the Reformation justified its existence in the sixteenth century after a long period of despotism and of darkness, but it can no longer offer to the world anything but theological fantasies, and motives of discord between the different members of the great Christian family.

What mankind needs now is no more a belief, a faith drawn from some particular system or religion, and inspired by texts which though worthy of respect, are of very doubtful authenticity, and in which truth and error are inextricably mixed. What is need is a belief founded on proofs, on facts, a certitude based on study and experience, from which will come an ideal of justice, a true understanding of destiny, an incentive to perfection, which will regenerate the nations and link together men of all races and all religions.

Undoubtedly, there are too many historic and religious bonds of union between the modern thought and the Christian idea, for them to be entirely separated. There are in Christianity elements of progress, germs of social and moral life, which, if developed, can produce great things. The doctrine of Christ contains much teaching which has been allowed to sink out of sight, but which, rightly understood, may produce fruits of wisdom and of love, and powerful results for the general good. Let us be Christians, but let us raise ourselves above the different confessions to the pure source whence the Gospels came. Let us love Christ, but place Him above the intolerant sects, above the Churches which are trying to exclude and anathematise each other. Christ can neither be Jesuit, nor Jansenist, nor Hughenot; His arms are widely open to all mankind.


.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

We have seen the consequences, in our country at least,
3 of Catholic education. But if it is imcomplete and full of errors, are we to prefer to it lay education? Lay education produces effects opposed to those we have indicated. It gives to man a spirit of independence, it frees him from religious and governmental guardiamship, but at the same time it weakens in him moral discipline, without which no society can be strong. This teaching is not, as its detractors have said of it, without principles; but it has not been able to put anything in the place of the Christian ideal.

The primary, or infant instruction, is too hasty, and too soon abandoned. It is not completed by the indispensable element of moral teaching. It leaves the child, and consequently, the man, ignorant of the most essential things - the great laws of life.

When, at twelve or fourteen years of age, the child leaves the primary school, furnished with his certificate of study, and is thrown into the great social battle, he is wanting in that solid foundation, and knowledge of truth and of duty, which is the great support, the best weapon in the struggle for existence.

All that has been taught him of the duties of man (not too much at best) has been told him at an age when he coul not appreciate its value. It will most likely fade away, leaving no traces behind.

But, it will be said, if the primary instruction is insufficient, and ill-assimilated, later on, in the higher and classical education, the young man will surely find and ample store of principles, of the ideas essential to him in his pursuit of a high end. Well, this again is an illusion. I quote the opinion of the celebrated writer, Francisque Sarcy, who declared, in one of his articles in the "Petit Journal (March 7, 1894). "From my classical studies, from my passage through the philosophy classes, there has remained with me no precise idea on the destinies of mankind." This reminds us of the well-known remark of a gook judge in such matters: Classical philosophy is but the history of the contradictions of the human mind."

Materialism and positivism reign almost exclusively in the upper political spheres, peopled by intelligences moulded by higher education. The influence of these theories must react on political and social life.

If one goes to the bottom of the subject, one is obliged to admit that lay education is impregnated with scepticism, and inspired by the negative philosophies. Hence weakness as a moral agent.

It is true that we hear much of altruism; but altruism is but an empty word, a baseless theory. It is a seed sown on rocky soil, and destined to perish; for it is not enough to sow, we must also prepare the ground. You cannot move to altruistic sentiments men penetrated by the idea that the struggle for the needs and interests of life is the supreme law of existence, men convinced that all hopes, all generous impulses, are destined to end in nothing.

Materialism, that vigorous and inevitable reaction against dogma and superstition, has penetrated all strata of society. Among cultivated people, it is decorated with the name of Positivism, but the results are the same.

Materialism has had its day of triumph. At one time, its theories over-ruled science. But although strong to destroy, it can build up nothing, therefore, those who answer to its call, sooner or later abandon it.

If materialistic ideas have spread from the highest political regions down to the lowest social depths; in the dominions of science, on the other hand, they have lost very much of their influence. The experiments of modern psychology have shown superabundantly that all is not merely matter or force, as Buchner, Carl Vogt, Jules Soury, and others affirmed; it is proved that life is not a property of the body vanishing with it.
4 After the experiments of Dr Luys, de Baraduc, de Roches, Meyers, Richet, etc., Carl Vogt would no longer dare to say that "the brain secretes thought as the liver secretes bile." The secretions of the human body can be weighed, but who has ever weighed thought? Even the theory of atoms has fallen into discredit. The atom, the essential basis of the universe, the materialists tell us, is now considered by chemists as a pure abstraction. As Berthelot says in his "Origins of Chemistry," page 320: "The ether of the physicists and the atom of the chemists are vanishing, to give place to higher conceptions, which tend to explain everything by the phenomena of movement."

W. Oswald, Professor of Physics at the University of Leipsic, in his article entitled, "The Defeat of Atomism," ("Revue Générale des Sciences" of Nov. 1895), expresses himself in these words, on the subject of atoms and the mechanical theory of the universe, which theory embraces celestial mechanics and the phenomena of organic life: "It is a very imperfect invention. The attempt has not even the value of an auxiliary hypothesis. It is an error pure and simple." Oswald believes, with Newton, that there must exist "higher principles" than those yet known. We see from these opinions of these competent men that the materialists have built up the edifice of science on the most narrow possible bais.

Materialism embraces only one side of truth. Without doubt matter is grand if considered in the majestic unity of its laws. But even if we could know it in its essence, matter is not everything. It represents only the lower aspects of the world and of life.

Materialism bases its conclusions wholly on the testimony of the senses, but our senses are li
mited and insufficient; often they mislead us. It is not with the physical senses, or with instruments of precision, or retorts, that we discover the higher laws and causes. Reason alone can teach the supreme reason of things.

Materialists hoped to penetrate all the secrets of nature by an attentive study of physical forms. They were like the miner who works his vein underground, and who, at every step, discovers treasures and new riches; as, to give them their due, has indeed been the case of the positive scientists also. But as a miner advances, he loses sight of the light of day, of the splendid dominions of life, to go ever deeper into the regions of night, of silence and of death. It is thus that materialism proceeds. Much as science has done for man, we may yet wonder that she has not given him a real knowledge of himself, or of the laws of his destiny. We feel vaguely that she might have done so if instead of confining herself to the study of matter, she had been willing to explore, sincerely and assiduously, the dominions of life itself. Under pressure of the negative doctrines, science has lost herself in analysis, in fragmentary study of physical nature. But the dust of science is not science, and the dust of truth is not truth. Mankind, weary of metaphysical conceptions and tehological solutions, had turned ist eyes and hopes towards science. It asked the secret of existence, a belief, a new faith, to take the place of that of the crumbling Churches. It asked for the solution of those problems of life which dominate, surround and envelop us in their depths. To these repeated calls, science remained deaf. If, in some cases, a solution was suggested, it was the idea of nothingness. From that came the disappointment and irritation of certain thinkers, and the accusations so freely made; but the accusations must be made excldusively against the materialistic and positive schools. Science, as a whole, when she has thrown off her shackles, will attain her goal by higher and more enlightened conceptions.

   
.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   

It has always greatly surprised us to find, among the men of liberty who direct the destinies of the Republic, many who think or call themselves, materialists and atheists. How is it that they do not understand that materialism, founded on blind fatality and consecrating the right of might, cannot make free men? The democracy of '89 and '84 had other views. According to materialistic theories, man is but a machine governed by instincts.

Well, for a machine, there can neither be liberty nor responsibility, nor moral laws; for moral law is a law of the spirit. Without moral law, what becomes of the idea of duty? It disappears, and with it all established order. A society can only live and develop by having for a foundation the idea of duty, namely, virtue and justice. These are the sole possible bases for social order. That is why society has never been able to reconcile itself to atheism; for, just as superstition and idolatry lead us to despotism, so atheism and materialism must logically end in the depreciation of the social forces, often in anarchy and nihilism.

With such theories circulating among the masses, materialism has become a real social peril. It has rendered man"s load of misery harder to bear, his outlook on life more; it has diminished human energy, and driven the unhappy to misery and despair.

How can we therefore wonder if marriages become more rare, if infanticides, suicides, and madness multiply rapidly? It is a sign of our times that young people of both sexes, almost children, rush to suicide from the most futile motives. According to statistics, the number of self-inflicted deaths has increased three hundred per cent, during the last fifty years. The crimes committed by quite young men are frequent. The army of vice and of assassination is increasing at a fearful rate.

With the materialistic theories, moral responsibility disappears. Man is not free, we are told by Buchner and his disciples; he is the slave of his surroundings. Crime is explained by avatism and heredity. It is a natural phenomenon, the necessary effect of a cause which is the result of a blind fatality. Therefore, there is neither good nor evil. Thus the gravest faults are excused, consciences are lulled to sleep, and all idea of moral sanction or of justice is ruined. For, truly, if crime is a fatality, if it is involuntary, it is not guilty, or shameful. If passion is irresistible, why try to conquer it? Such views, propagated in all classes, have as a natural consequence the direct excitement of the worst appetites, and the development of sensuality and selfish instincts. In the wealthy classes, many have but one object; to suppress the duties and painful struggles of life, to make of existence a perpetual festival, a kind of intoxication from which the awakening may be terrible.

They deny free-will and the survival of the soul; they deny God, duty, and justice, all the principles on which human society reposes, without taking thought as to what must be the result of these negations.

A literature inspired by this disgust for life has arisen and spread in all directions, a literature which is a menace to all generous impulses and enthusiasms, and carries us straight to the blackest pessimism.

A well-known journalist, Edmond Lepelletier, wrote thus on the subject of the ship-wreck of the Utopia:-

"All the advantages of existence belong to those who are the best armed for triumph in the vital struggle, and the best armed is the most pitiless, the most selfish, the least accessible to sentiments of humanity or even of justice. It is this necessity for struggle, and this inevitable victory by force, in spite of right, of justice, of humanity itself, which secures the vigour of societies and the salvation of civilisations."


"What is good?"
5 asks Frederick Nietsche, "Power. What is bad? Weakness. What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome. Not contentment, but more power, not peace above all, but war, not virtue, but valour. Perish the weak and the failures. And let us help them to disappear. What is more hurtful than any vice? It is pity for the poor and the feeble."

Such is the tone of materialistic writers and philosophers in the public press. Can they really know what responsibilities they incur? Do they dream of the harvest which such seed will produce? Do they not see that in vulgarising such iniquitous and despairing doctrines, they place in the hands of the unhappy the torch of the incendiary and the weapons of death?

Ah! these doctrines may appear inoffensive to the rich and happy, but what application will those who suffer, and with whom fate has dealt hardly, make of them?

The examples of Vaillant and Emile Henry show us.

Vaillant declared before the Jury of the Seine, in January 1894, that it was the reading of materialistic works that suggested to him the idea of his crime.

Emily Henry held forth in the same strain; "Scientific studies initiated me into the forces of nature; I am a materialist and an atheist."

Oh! materialists, with your inexorable laws of atavism and heredity, you have distilled a subtle poison into the name of GOD, you have told them that earthly joys are the only ones, that all appetites are legitimate, and that life is but the shadow of a moment. And the people have believed you!

Woe be to those who have stilled the voice of conscience, and killed the pure and disinterested ideal, and taught the people that all is matter and death the end.

Woe to those who will not admit that every human creature has a right to existence, and to the light, and even more, to spiritual life; to those who have given and example of immorality, of silfishness and of sensuality.

Against this society which offers to man neither protection, consolation, nor moral aid, a furious storm is preparing. It is not withou danger that the human soul is compressed, that the moral evolution of the world is interfered with, that thought is enclosed in the iron circle of scepticism. A day will come when this thought will recoil with violence, and the foundations of society will be shaken by fearful convulsions.

But lift up thy head, oh man, and hope once more. A new ray of light will descend from space and illumine thy path. All that thou hast been taught hithertois incomplete and sterile.

What matters apparent death, if life is immortal, if the being is imperishable in its essence, if death itself is but a phase of its elevation?

We must not only see the material evolution. That is only one side of things. The destruction of organisms, prove nothing. They are but passing structures; the body is but a clothing. The reality is the psychic being, the spirit which animates these material forms. The spirit remains entire beyond the tomb, with all the qualities acquired and merits accumulated, ready for renewed ascencions. It is clothed in that subtle envelope, the fluidic body, from which it is inseparable, which existed before birth, and now exists in each one of us, and will survive us at death. The existence of this subtle body is demonstrated daily by experiments of separation of the double, of the exteriorisation of sensibility, by the apparitions of phantoms of the living during sleep, as well as of those of the dead.

On other points, the materialistic theories are not more happy. They tell us that all that characterises the human mind, aptitudes, faculties, virtues and vices, is explained by the law of heredity and the influence of surroundings. Look about you, you will see that fact gives the lie to those assertions. Yes, the influence of material conditions is poweful, and bows certain spirits under its yoke.  But how many others, by will, courage, and perseverance, have raised themselves from the most obscure positions, from the inferior ranks to the heights of genius. How many thinkers, learned men, philosophers, born in poverty, have by their own efforts, attained to the front rank. Is it necessary to name them? Let us remember that Copernicus was the son of a baker; Kepler, whose father was a public-house keeper, was himself a waiter in his youth; Alembert, a foundling, picked up one winter's night on the steps of a church, was brought up by the wife of a glazier; Newton and Laplace were the sons of poor peasants; Humphrey Davy, the servant of a druggist; Franklin, a printer's apprentice. All these, and thousands of others were able to overcome the most unfavourable conditions, triumph over the greatest obstacles, and conquer a lasting reputation.

It is therefore neither birth nor conditions that give talent. An illustrious father may have most commonplace children. Two brothers may resemble each other physically, eat the same food, receive the same education, and have neither the same aptitude nor the same talents.

We clearly see that intelligence, genius, virtue, are therefore not the results of material conditions, but of a power higher than these conditions, and which often dominates and governs them.

The will can sometimes assert itself, and overcome the resistance of the flesh amid the most cruel torutures. Do we not see this in the case of those who have suffered and died for a great cause, all those martyrs who have given their lives for the truth? We see Giordano Bruno, preferring torture to retraction; Campanella, who was subjected seven times to torture, and seven times repeated his bitter satires against the inquisitores; Joan of Arc, who died at the stake; Socrates, who saved philosophy and drank the hemlock rather than deny his doctrine. There were Pierre Ramus, Arnauld de Brescia, John Huss, Jerome of Prague, Savonarolo.

In all these great martyrs, we see the triumph of mind over matter. The body, torn by suffering, complains and groans, but the soul asserts its authority and subdues the revolt of the flesh.

This show us of what immense use is that great faculty, the will, the constant and elightened use of which can raise man so high. Will is the weapon which he must be taught to use, to sharpen without ceasing. Those who by their sophistries try to diminish, or weaken it, commit a fatar error.

Is it not a bitter thought that the two doctrines which are the widest spread among us, Catholicism on the one hand, materialism on the other, both concur to annihilate or at least to dwarf the powers hidden in the human being; reason, will, liberty, the powers by which man can accomplish such great things, and create for himself a marvellous future.

   
.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .

Humanity is swayed between two errors, one which affirms and one which denies; one says to man, "Believe without understanding," and the other cries to him, "Die without hope."

On one side, idolatry, for He is but an idol, this God who desires more and yet more blood spilt in His name; who rears himself as an obstacle between man and science; who combats progress and liberty; a sombre divinity, to worship whom one must first veil the face of the Christ, and trample under foot reason and conscience.

Un the presente day, there is no moral renovation possible except outside of the dogmatism of the Churches. What our society needs is a religious conception in harmony with the universe and with science, and which shall satisfy human reason. A dogmatic restoration would be fruitless. The people would not be deceived by it. Dogma to them is the Church. And the Church by allying herself to all forms of oppression, has become, as has been well said by J. Jaurés: "one of the forms of exploitation of humanity." Its affirmations have today lost all credit with the masses. The people, today, want the truth, the whole truth.

It is true that Christianity contains germs and principles, long obscure and misunderstood, which require only a new impulse to bring them out, as long-buried seed appears at length on the surface, and grows and bears fruit. Christianity, more than any other religion, brought to the world active love for all who suffer, devotion to humanity carried to the extreme of sacrifice, and the idea of fraternity in life and in death, that appeared in history under the image of the Crucified One, the Christ dying for all men. It is this great idea which has been falsified and distorted by the Church and needs a new impetus from without. This will be role of modern spiritualism.

The new revelation, the teachings of spirits, the proofs they give of survival, of the immortality of the soul and of eternal justice, enable us to distinguish that which is living from that which is dead in Christianity. If men of good faith were willing to convince themselves of the power of these teachings and accept their fruits, they would find in them a renewal of exhausted life and dying ideals. This ideal proclaimed by the Invisible is not different from that of the founders of Christianity. It aims always at realising on earth the "reign of God and His justice," at purifying the human soul of its vices and errors, to raise it after its falls, and by giving it a knowledge of the higher laws and its true destinies, to develop in it that spirit of wisdom and of love without which there is neither social peace nor elevation. Christianity, to be born again and become resplendent, must revivify itself at the spring which quenched the thrist of the first Christians. It must free itself from all that is supernatural and miraculous in character, and become once more simple, clear, and rational, without thereby ceasing to be a bond between man, the invisible world and God. Without this bond, there is no strong belief, no high philosophy, no living religion. Religion must throw off its worn-out forms, and take inspiration from modern discoveries, the laws of nature and the promptings of reason. She must familiarise the human mind with that law of destiny which multiplies its existences, placing it alternately in the two worlds, the material and the fluidic, and permits it thus to complete and develop itself, and to earn its own happiness. She must make it understand that a close fellowship unites all the members of the two humanities, that of earth and that of space; those who live in the flesh and those who aspire by a new birth to continue to work for their own progress and that of their neighbours. She must show it, above all, that law of sovereign justice by virtue of which each one reaps, throughout the ages, all that he has sown of good and of evil. These ideas, these laws, properly understood, will form a new basis of education, a principle of betterment, a religious bond between men. For the bond of solidarity which unites them reaches back through the past, extends to the future, and embraces all centuries and unites all worlds. Members of one great family, united throughout their existences in the vast field of their destinies, starting from the same point to arrive at the same heights, all men are brothers and must help each other, support each other on their journey through the ages towards an ideal of wisdom, knowledge, and virtue.

But, you will object, that will no longer be "our" religion. Doubtless, the new spiritualism is not a religion; but it appears in the world holding a torch in its had and its light shines afar and puts life into all religions. Modern Spiritualism is a belief founded on facts, on tangible realities, a belief which develops and progresses with mankind and can unite all beings, elevating them towards a higher and always higher conception of God, of destiny, and of duty. By it each of us will learn to commune with the supreme Author of all things, the Father of all, who is your God and our God, and of whom, since the beginning of time, all the minds that think and the hearts that love, have been in search.

When humanity is delivered from the superstitions and phantoms of the past, then you will see bursting into blossom the germs of love and of good sown by the Divine hand, and you will know the true religion, which raises itself above all differing beliefs, and anathematises none of them.

   

1 See note 10. On the condemnation of Galileo, in 1615.
2 See note 1, at end of book.
³France
4  See "Après la Mort," by same author, chap. VIII.
5 "Anti-Christ," by F. Nietsche.

CHAPTER IX

THE NEW REVELATION - SPIRITUALISM AND SCIENCE

THE new revelation has appeared in unexpected forms, or rather, in forgotten forms, which are nevertheless identical with those of the first manifestations of Christianity.

The latter began by miracles. It is on the material proof of survival that the religion of Christ is found.¹ Modern Spiritualism reveals itself by the aid of phenomena. Miracle and phenomena are two names for ane and the same thing. The different meaning attached to it gives the measure of the progress of the human mind in nineteen centuries. The miracle was supposed to be superior to the natural law, phenomena is subject to it. It is but the effect of a cause, the result of a law. Experience and reason have shown that miracles are impossible. The laws of nature, which are the divine laws, cannot be violated, for they regulate and maintain the harmony of the universe. God cannot give Himself the lie.

The phenomena from beyond the tomb are found as the basis of all the great doctrines of the past. In nearly every age communion has united the invisible world to the visible. But, in India, in Egypt, and in Greece, this study was the privilege of a small number of investigators and initiates, and the results were carefully kept secret.

To render this study possible to all, to make known the true laws which govern the invisible world, to teach men to see in these phenomena, not a supernatural order of things, but an unknown domain of nature and of life, the work of centuries was needed, and all the discoveries of science, all the conquests of the human mind over matter. It was necessary that man should know his true place in the universe, that he should learn to measure the weakness of his own senses, and their incapacity to explore, by themselves and without assistance, all the dominions of living nature.

Science, by her inventions, has remedied somewhat the imperfections of our organs. The telescope has opened up to our view the immensities of space; the microscope has revealed to us the infinitely small. Life has appeared to us everywhere, in the world of the infusoria as well as on the surface of the gigantic globes which move through the heavens. Physics have discovered the laws which govern the transformation of forces, the conservation of energy, and those which maintain the equilibrium of the universe; chemistry has made known to us the combinations of substance. Steam and electricity have revolutionised the surface of the globe, facilitated the relations between peoples and the manifestations of thought, so that it may propagate itself on all points of the therrestrial sphere.

The human mind has been enabled to see deep down into the great Bible of nature, that divine book which surpasses in its majesty all the human bibles. We have read clearly in it the formulas and the laws which preside over the evolutions of life, and the march of the universe.

Today, the study of the invisible world comes to complete this magnificent ascension of thought and of science. The problem of the beyond presents itself to mankind with a power, an authority, an insistence such as has probably never before been displayed in history.

Never has there been seen such a gathering of facts and phenomena, considered at first as impossible, and awakening in the majority of our contemporaries only antipathy and disdain, finally to command attention and the most exhaustive examination by prominent men.

About the middle of the last century, man, disappointed by all the contradictory theories and incomplete systems which had been offered him, was giving way to doubt; he was losing more and more the idea of a future life. It was then that the invisible world came to him and pursued him even into his home. By different means the dead manifested themselves to the living. The voices from beyond the tomb spoke. The mysteries of the oriental sanctuaries, the occult phenomena of the Middle Ages were renewed after a long silence; and spiritualism was born. It was beyond the seas, in a world young, rich in vital energy, in ardent growth, less subject than old Europe to the spirit of routine and to the prejudices of the past; it was in the United States of America that the first manifestations of modern spiritualism took place. From thence they spread over the entire globe. This point of departure was wisely chosen. Free America was the most propitious centre for a work of renovation. Today we find there more than twenty millions of modern spiritualists.

But on one side of the Atlantic as on the other, the phases of progression of the spiritualistic idea have been the same, though differing in intensity.

On the two continents, the study of magnetism and of the fluids had prepared certain minds for the observation of the invisible world.

At first strange things happened; things which were spoken of with bated breath, and in private. Then, little by little the rumours gained in strenght. Men of talent, scientific men, whose names were a guarantee of honour and sincerity, dared to speak aloud of these facts and to affirm them. At first hypnotism and suggestion were spoken of, then came telepathy, cases of levitation and all the phenomena of spiritualism.

Tables began to dance, articles were transported from one spot to another without contact, knocks were heard in the walls and on the furniture.

A whole series of facts were observed, manifestations in appearance vulgar, but perfectly adapted to the exigencies of these earthly surroundings, to the positive and skeptical turn of mind of modern society.

The phenomena spoke to the senses, for the senses are as the openings through which the fact penetrates to the understanding. The impressions produced on the organism awaken surprise, provoke research, lead to conviction. The facts ever increased in number, and the phenomena became more advanced.

After the first material and gross phase, the manifestations took on another character. The knocks regulated themselves and became a means of communication both conscious and intelligente; automatic writing began to spread. The possibility of intercourse between the visible and the invisible worlds appeared as a gigantic fact, upsetting all received ideas, all customary teachings, but opening up a view of the future life which men hesitated to accept, dazzled as they were by the perspectives opening out before them.

At the same time as the rapid spread of spiritualism, numerous oppositions were formed. Like all new ideas, it had to undergo contempt, calumny and moral persecution.

Like the Christian idea in its beginning it had the bitterest insults heaped on it. It was ever thus. Whenever a new aspect of truth presents itself to man, it is invariable met by suspicion and hostility.

This is easily understood. Mankind has exhausted the old forms of thought and belief, and when these unexpected forms of truth appear, they do not seem to answer to the old ideal which is enfeebled, but not dead. It requires a long period of examination, reflection, and incubation, for the new idea to make its way into men's minds. From this come the uncertainties and sufferings to be passed through at the beginning.

Much mockery has been aimed at the forms under which modern spiritualism appeared. But the invisible powers who watch over mankind are better judges than we of the means of action and training required, according to the time and place, to bring man back to a knowledge of his duty and his destiny, and, that, without interfering with his free-will. For that is the essential point, man's liberty must remain entire.

The superior wisdom knew how to adapt to the needs of an epoch and a race the new forms of the eternal vevelation. Thus were raised up thinkers, experimenters, men of science, who indicated the path to be followed and took the first steps. Their work went slowly and steadily on. Weak and imperfect were the firs results, but the idea penetrated little by little into the mind. A movement is sometimes none the less deep and sure for being at first almost unnoticed.


In our time, science has become the sovereign mistress and directing power of the intellectual movement. Weary of metaphysical speculations and religious dogmas, mankind demanded tangible proofs, a solid basis on which to build its convictions. It attached itself to experimental study, to the observation of facts, as to a plank of safety. That is why the revelation took on a scientific character. It was by material facts that the attention of men was attracted, for men had themselves become material.

The mysterious phenomena which we find disseminated throughout the history of the past have been renewed and multiplied around us; they have been produced in a progressive order which seems to indicate a preconceived plan, the execution of a thought, of a will.

For, as the new spiritualism gained ground, the phenomena became transformed. The gross manifestations of the beginning improved and took on a more elevated character. Mediums received by means of writing, mechanically or intuitively, messages and inspirations, from outside sources. Instruments of music were played without being touched. Voices and singing were heard; penetrating melodies which seemed to descend from the heavens, and troubled even the most incredulous. Direct writing was produced on the inner sides of slates which had been fastened together and sealed. The phenomena of incorporation permitted the dead to take possession of the organism of a sleeping subject, and through it to converse with those they had known on earth. Gradually and according to a well calculated development, seeing mediums (clairvoyants), speakin and healing mediums, appeared.

At last, the inhabitants of space, clothing themselves in temporary envelopes, came and mixed with men, living for a moment their material and earthly lives, allowing themselves to be seen, touched, photographed; leaving imprints of their hands, of their faces, and then fading away again to return to their etherial life.

It is thus that for more than half a century a chain of facts has been produced, beginning with the lowest and most trivial, and extending to the most subtle, according to the degree of elevation of the intelligences which intervened; a complete series of manifestations which were spread out before the eyes of attentive observers.

Thus in spite of the difficulties of experimentation, in spite of the cases of imposture and the money-making for which the phenomena have sometimes been the pretext, apprehension and distrust have little by little decreased, and the number of experimenters is ever on the increase.

For more than fifty years, and in all coutries, spirit phenomena have been the object of frequent investigations, undertaken and directed by scientific commissions. Skeptical scientists, celebrated professors, belonging to all the great universities of the world, have passed these facts through most rigorous and searching examinations. Their intentions were always at first to expose what they thought to be trickery or hallucination. But all of them, incredulous as they were at the start, after years of conscientious study and persistent experiment, have abandoned their prejudices and bowed before the reality of the facts.

The more the problem of the proofs of the persistence of the human personality beyond the tomb was examined and scrutinised, the more numerous became the cases of identity. The spirit manifestations noted by thousands in all parts of our globe, have clearly demonstrated that an invisible world surrounds us, in touch with us, a world in which live, in a fluidic state, all those who have preceded us on the earth, who have struggled and suffered here, and now constitute beyond the tomb a second humanity.

The New Spiritualism presents itself today with such a mass of proofs, with such an imposing array of testimony, that doubt is no longer possible for the honest enquirer. Professor Challis of Cambridge University, says: "I have been unable to resist the large amount of testimony to such facts, which has come from so many independent sources, and from a vast number of witnesses. England, France, Germany, the United States of America, with most of the other nations of Christendom, contributed simultanesouly their quota of evidence. In short, the testimony has been so abundant and consistent, that either the facts must be admitted to be such as are reported, or the possibility of certifying facts by human testimony must be given up." ²

Thus, the movement of propagation has become more and more accentuated. At the present moment, we are in the midst of a veritable and general outbreak of the spiritualistic idea. The belief in the invisible world has spread over the whole surface of the earth. Everywhere spiritualism has its societies for experimental research, its popularisers, its journals.

 .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

To return to an essential point. The error or skepticism of man in regard to the existence of the invisible world comes from one cause only; the incapacity of his organs to furnish him with a complete idea of the forms and the possibilities of life.

We have too much lost sight of the fact that our senses, though refined and developed since the origin of humanity, can yet only perceive the most rudimentary forms of matter; its subtle states escape them absolutely. Hence the general opinion that life is only possible under such forms and organisms as those which meet our eyes. Hence also the false idea that life is everywhere only an imitation, a reproduction of what we see around us.

From the time when, by the aid of powerful optical instruments, the infinitely great and the infinitely small revealed themselves, we were obliged to admit that our senses, left to themselves, could only embrace a very restricted space in the dominions of nature; and that, to be plain, we knew almost nothing of the universal life.

At a much more recent period we knew only the three most elementary states of matter, the solid, the liquid, and the gaseous. We knew nothing of the innumerable transformations of which it is capable.

It is not much over twenty years since the fourth state of matter, the radiant, became known to scientists. Sir W. Crookes, the English scientist, first discovered its existence; and his spiritualistic experiments, continued during three years, were not unconnected with this discovery. He was able to show that matter, rendered invisible, reduced to infinitesimal quantities, acquires energies and incalculable powers, and that these energies augment without ceasing, as matter becomes more rarefied.

More recently, the researches of numerous scientists have confirmed these discoveries. Little by little science has attacked the dominions of the invisible, the intangible, and the imponderable. She has been obliged to admit that the radiant state is not the last which matter can take on; beyond this, it has appeared in aspects more and more subtle, rarefying itself almost indefinitely, without ceasing to be the possible form, the necessary form of life.

What science is only beginning to perceive, spiritualists knew long ago through the revelations of spirits. They had learnt that the visible world was only an infinite atom of the universe, that beyond the range of our senses, matter, force, and life present themselves in various ways, under innumerable aspects. We are surrounded and enveloped by radiations invisible to us on account of the grossness of our organs.

All these things are proved today by scientific experiments. The discovery of the existence of these various kinds of energy and subtle forms of matter, furnish at the same time the rational explanation of spiritualistic phenomena. It is there that the Invisibles find the force they use in their physical manifestations; it is of the elements of imponderable matter that their envelopes and organisms are constituted.

All honest searchers have not been slow to admit this. Since the discovery of radiant matter, science has advanced step by step in this vast empire of the unknown. Each day she confirms, by new experiments, what the human spirit, more clear-sighted than our senses, had long foreseen.

Science had begun by photographing the invisible rays of the solar spectrum, the ultra-violet rays and the infra-red, which do not impress our retina. Then she obtained the reproduction, on the sensitive plate, of a great number of stellar worlds, of far-off stars, lost in the depths of space, at such a distance that their luminous radiantions escape not only our eyes, but sometimes even the telescope.

We know that the sensations of light, like those of sound, and of heat, etc., are produced by a determined quantity of vibrations of the ether.

The retina, our organ of sight, and the most perfect of our organs, perceives the undulations of ether from 400 trillions per second up to 790 trillions, that is to say all that constitutes the scale of colours, from the red, at one end of the solar spectrum, to the violet, at the other end. Beyond that there is no sensation. Professor stokes has nevertheless succeeded in rendering the ultra-violet rays visible, by passing them through a paper saturated in a solution of sulphate of quinine which reduces the number of vibrations. Professor Tyndall likewise rendered visible by means of heat the infra-red rays, which are invisible to the eye in a normal state.

Starting from these premises, we can admit scientifically an uninterrupted series of invisible vibrations, and deduce therefrom that if our organs were susceptible enough to receive the impression, we could distinguish an unimaginable variety of unknown colours, and also innumerable forms, substances and organisms, which do not now appear to us on account of the imperfection of our senses.

Therefore, though beyond those luminous waves perceived by the retina, a great number of vibrations escape us, these vibrations can be received by the photographic plate, which is more sensitive than the human eye. This is what permits us to say that the photographic lens is like an eye open to the invisible. We have a new proof of this in the application of the X-rays, Rontgen's dark rays, to photography. These rays, though invisible, have nevertheless sufficient force to traverse certain opaque bodies, such as cloth, flesh and wood, and to reproduce objects hidden from all eyes, such as the contents of a purse, of a sealed letter, etc. They penetrate throughly the human organism, and not the smallest detail of our anatomy escapes them. The uses of the X-rays are rapidly multiplying, and show us what considerabel advantage the science of the future can derive from the subtle forms of matter, when she learns how to store them up and direct them.

The discovery of luminous matter and its applications is of great importance. Not only does it prove to us that the forms of matter continue indefinitely beyond our senses, some of them perceptible to a menchanical registering apparatus; but also that these forms and rays, as they advance in subtlety, acquire at the same time more force and penetration. We accustom ourselves thus to study nature in her hidden and most powerful aspects.

In these manifestations of energy, still ill-understood, we find the scientific explanation of a mass of phenomena, such as apparitions, and the passage of spirits through solid bodies. The application of the X-rays to photography enables us to understand the double-sight of mediums and the photography of spirits. For, if the plate can be influenced by invisible rays, and by the radiations of imponderable matter which penetrate opaque bodies, how much more readily will the quintessenced fluid which forms the invisible envelope of the spirits impress the medium's retina, which is much more delicate and complex apparatus than a glass plate.


It is thus that spiritualism is each day strengthened by arguments drawn from the discoveries of science, which will eventually overcome even the deepest rooted skepticism.

The photography of the radiations of thought have have opened a new field to investigators.

The Doctors Baraduc, Luys,3 and Lebon, have succeeded in fixing on the sensitive plate the radiations of thought and the vibrations of the will. These experiments we have ourselves engaged in during a number of years, and they prove that there exists in each human being a centre of invisible radiations, a focus of light which escapes our sight, but can impress photographic plates.

Either by contact of the fingers on the gelatine or even on the glass itself, or by holding the plate, in a dark room, near the brain, we obtain on it undulations and vibrations varying in intensity and aspect according to the different mental states of the operator. Uniform and regular in the normal state, the waves form themselves into whirls and spirals under the influence of anger, spread into wide sheets in ecstasy, and rise in majestic columns during prayer, like the vapour of incense.

We have even been able to reproduce on the plate the fluidic double of man, that mysterious double which is the centre of these radiations. Colonel de Rochas, head of the Polytechnic School of France, and Dr. Barlemont obtained the simultaneous photographs of the body of a medium and of its double, momentarily separated.4

As a prelude to so many objective proofs which we mention further on, photography has revealed to us the existence of this fluidic body, which lines and sustains our physical body. This subtle envelope forms the luminous and radiant envelope of the spirit, inseparable from it during life as after death.

Photographic plates are not only impressed by the fluidic vibrations of the human body, but also show us the forms belonging to the invisible world, to beings who exist, live and move around us, presiding over a whole series of manifestations which we will rapidly review, and which it has been vainly sought to explain by any other means than by their presence and action.

These beings, freed by death from the needs and miseries of human nature, continue to act by means of their imperishable envelope, the fluidic body; a body formed of these most subtle elements of matter of which we have spoken, and which until now had escaped our senses in their normal condition.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

The question of the fluidic body, although already treated by us elsewhere,5 requires further explanation, for it enables us to understand better the life in space and the action of spirits on matter.

We all know that the molecules of our physical bodies are subject to constant changes. Each day our carnal envelope eliminates a certain number of elements and assimilates new ones. The whole body, from the soft parts of the brain to the hardest parts of the bone structure, is renewed entirely in a certain number of years. In the midst of these constant currents there exists always in us an original fluidic form, compressible and expansible, which maintains and perpetuates itself. It is in it, on the pattern presented by it, though invisible to our senses, that the molecules of gross matter fix and incorporate themselves. The Perispirit is the moud, the fluidic outline of the human body. That is why, when death separates them, the material body immediately falls to pieces and is decomposed. The frame-work has been withdrawn from it.

The perispirit is the permanent envelope of the spirit, whereas the physical body is only a temporary clothing, a borrowed dress which we don for our earthly pilgrimage. The perispirit exists before birth and survives death. It constitutes, in its intimate union with the spirit, the president and essential element of our individuality, throughout the multiple existence which we tranverse. It is the perispirit which automatically directs all the actions pertaining to the keeping up of life; and under the influence of the vital force, it disposes the material molecules according to a predetermined plan or pattern which represents all the apparatus of our organism, respiration, circulation, the nervous system, etc.6

It is by the existence of this fluidic body, by its separation, natural or voluntary, from the physical body during sleep, that the apparition of the phantoms of the living is explained, and, consequently that of the spirits of the dead.

It has often been proved that the fluidic double of a living person detaches itself, under certain conditions, from the material body, to appear and manifest itself at a distance. These phenomena are known as telepathic.

Therefore, if during life the fluidic form can act outside of, and independently of the body, it becomes evident that death cannot put an end to its activity.

In the special study of the phenomena of the exteriorisation of sensibility and of motion, Colonel de Rochas, head of the Polytechnic School of France, and with him such celebrated scientists as Prof. Charles Richet and Sabatier, Drs. Ségrad and Dariex, Messrs de Grammont and de Watteville, have attacked the dominion of experimental proofs, from which clearly appears the certitude of the action of the fluidic double at a distance. The English scientists have gone even further. They have ascertained in numerous cases, that the fluidic envelopes of discarnate spirits have become visible, by condensation or rather by materialisation, as a vapour of water contained in a invisible form in the air may, by sucessive transformations, become visible and tangible in the form of ice. The perispirit is invisible to us in its ordinary state, because its subtle essence produces a number of vibrations too great to be perceived by our eyes. In the case of a materialisation the spirit is obliged to borrow from the medium or from other persons present coarser fluids which it assimilates to itself, so as to adapt, and to diminish the number of the vibrations of its envelope to meet the capacity or our vision. The operation is a difficult and delicate one. Nevertheless, the cases of apparitions of spirits are numerous and repose on a considerable volume of testimony.

The most celebrated case is that of the spirit of Katie King, which manifested itself during three years at the home of Sir William Crookes, the English professor, through the aid of the medium Florence Cook. Sir W. Crookes has himself described these experiences in a celebrated work, "Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritualism," and has lately again endorsed his conclusions, particularly in his speech as President of the British Association. Katie King the spirit, and Florence Cook the medium, were seen side by side. They were of different heights and differed from each other in many ways. The testimony of Sir W. Crookes is confirmed by Doctors Gully and Sexton, by the Prince of Sayn-Wittgenstein, by Harrison, by B. Coleman, by Serjeant Cox, by Varley, the electrical engineer, by Mrs. Florence Marryat, etc., who were all witnesses, at different times and under various circumstances, of these apparitions of Katie.

It has several times been falsely stated that Sir W. Crookes had retracted his statements. He has himself repeatedly denied this report. In April 1897, in passing through Paris, he stated for publication7 that not only did he maintain all his statements, but intended shortly to take up again and pursue further his researches into spiritualism.

Another celebrated case is that of the spirit of Abdullah, related by Prof. Aksakof, the Russian Counsellor of State; in his work "Animism and Spiritualism." The spirit was of an oriental type, and more than six feet high, whereas the medium Eglinton was short in stature and of a very pronounced Anglo-Saxon type.

The American scientist, Robert Dale Owen, at one time United States Ambassador to Napolis, worked six years on experimentos of materialisation. He declared that he had seen hundreds of spirit forms. In a séance given at the instigation of the American Society for Psychical Research, and at which the celebrated preacher the Rev. Mr Savage was present, thirty spirits materialised and appeared to the assistants, who recognised deceased friends and relations. These manifestations are frequent in America.8

The favourite objection of the incredulous, touching this kind of phenomenon, is that it is produced in the dark, and therefore lends itself to cheating. It must be remarked that darkness is requisite for the luminous apparitions, which are the most numerous. Light exercises a dissolving effect on the fluids, and a number of manifestations can only take place in its absence.

There are nevertheless cases in which spirits have been able to show themselves by a phosphorescent light. Others have dematerialised in full light. Under the glare of three gas-jets Katie King was seen to dissolve little by little, melt away and finally disappear.

To testimony such as this, we must add our own, though of much less importance, in regard to a fact which came under our personal observation.

During ten years we pursued this order of experiment with the assistance of a doctor of Tours, Dr A----, and a Captain of the Archives of the ninth Army Corps. Through one of these gentlemen, who was plunged in a magnetic sleep, the Invisibles had long promised us a materialisation. One evening we three were in the consulting room of our friend, the doors carefully closed and quite sufficient light still coming in through the large window to enable us to see most distinctly the smallest objects, when three raps sounded on a certain spot on the wall. It was the signal agreed on.

We looked in the direction of the sound, and saw, emerging from a blank wall, a human form of middle height. It showed itself in profile, the head and shoulders first appearing. Gradually, the whole body became visible. The upper part was clearly drawn, the outlines sharp and clear. The lower part was more vaporous and formed a confused mass. The apparition glided, not walked. After slowly crossing the room, passing within a step or two of us, it melted into the wall on the opposite side of the room and disappeared. This wall also was quite blank and contained no exit. We were able to gaze at the form for about three minutes, and on comparing our impressions of it, they proved to be identical.

As we have said, the materialisations and apparitions of spirits meet with obstacles which necessarily limit their number. It is otherwise in the case of certain phenomena of a physical order and of great variety, which are multiplied around us continually.

We will examine these facts, in their progressive order, according to the interest they present and the certitude we can derive from them, as to the free life of the spirit.

In the first place come the very common phenomena of haunted houses. They are habitations frequented by spirits of an inferior order, who give themselves up to noisy manifestations. Blows, sounds of all kinds, from the faintest to the loudest, cause the floors, the furniture, and the walls to vibrate. China is displaced and broken, stones are thrown in from the outside in spite of careful watching.

The papers bring us almost daily new tales of these phenomena. Scarcely have they ceased in one spot, before they begin in another, in France and other countries, attracting and holding public attention in suspense. In certain places, as at Valence-en-Brie, at Yzeures, in the department of Indre et Loire, at Ath, in Brabant, at Agen, etc., they lasted many months, in spite of the continuous efforts of the cleverest police and detectives to trace them to human agency.

These facts are explained by the malevolent action of invisible beings who thus satisfy, post-mortem, hatreds born during their earth-life, or requite injuries done by certain families or individuals, who thereby allow these ill-disposed disincarnates to obtain a hold over them.

In spite of the repugnance of science in general to the examination of these facts, each day we see the number of conscientious seekers increasing, who leave the beaten tracks and devote themselves to the patient observation of the invisible world. There is no month, no week indeed, which does not bring the discovery of some new and well authenticated fact in the realm of experimental research.

The phenomena of a physical order, such as the levitation of heavy bodies and their transportation to a distance, without contact, especially occupies the attention of certain scientists.

We have spoken elsewhere9 of the experiments made in Naples and at Milan, in 1892, by scientific men of various nations. Official reports drawn up by them recognised the intervention of unknown forces, and the action of will-power in the production of these phenomena. Analogous experiements have been made since in Rome, in Varsovie, at the home of Dr Ochorowicz; on the island of Roubaud, off Marseilles, at the country house of Prof. Ch Richet, Professor at the Academy of Medicine in Paris; at Bordeaux, and also at Agnélas, near Voiron, Isère, at the home of Col. de Rochas, head of the Polytechnic of France.10

>From everywhere came reports of the displacement of furniture and of instruments of music, without contact; of the levitation of the human body, of the lifting up of chairs with people seated on them. Professor Lombroso, in one of these reports, speaks of a sideboard which "advanced like a pachyderm."

All these manifestations might be more or less explained by strictly material causes, by the action of unconscious forces. The psychic force exteriorised by a human being would suffice, for instance, to explain the movements of tables or other objects at a distance, and even, by stretching a point, of any phenomena which does not show the action of an intelligence other than that of the spectators.

But what renders this explanation quite insufficient, is the fact that in most of the séances to which we refer, there are, besides these movements of things and persons, appearances of luminous hands and of human forms which are not those of the spectators, touches and contacts are felt, tunes are played on locked pianos, voices and songs are heard. Sometimes, as at Rome, in the experiments of Dr Sant Angelo, penetrating and unearthly melodies throw the hearers into almost an ecstasy of enjoyment.

All these phenomena are obtained in the presence of mediums who have become celebrated, among others, Eusapia Paladino. Here, some explanation of the nature and true object of mediumship appears necessary.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

Our senses, as we said above, only reveal to us a restricted portion of the universe. Nevertheless, the circle of our knowledge has little by little been enlarged, and will widen still more as our modes of perceiving improve. It would suffice for us to have one more sense, one new psychic faculty, for unknown worlds of life to open before us, and to see revealed the marvels of the invisible world.

Well, these new senses, these faculties which will one day belong to all, are possessed even now by some people in varying degrees, who are in consequence called mediums.

As we know, at all times, through all ages, there existed persons possessing, under different forms, special faculties, permitting them to communicate with the Invisible. All history, and the sacred books of every people, mention this on almost every page. The seers of Gaul, the oracles and soothsayers of Greece, the sibyls of the heathen world, the prophets, great and small, of the Jews, were but the mediums of our present day. The higher powers have always used the services of these intermediaries to convey their teachings and exhortations to humanity. The names only change, the facts remain the same, with this difference only that the facts are produced in greater number and in more striking form from time to time, as the hour comes for one of these periodic waves of increase of activity in the upward endeavour of man.

The higher spirits are not the only ones to manifest themselves; spirits of all classes like to get into connection with men when they find the means to do so. Hence the necessity of discrimination, in occult communications, between that which is from above and that which is from below; between that which comes from the spirits of light and that which proceeds from backward spirits. There are spirits of all sorts of character and degrees of elevation; indeed there are naturally around us more of the inferior than the higher ones. It is the former kind who produce the physical phenomena, the noisy manifestations, and everything of a vulgar order, but who nevertheless have their use, as they reveal to us the knowledge of a world we had forgotten.

In these phenomena, the mediums play a passive part, like that of the pile in electricity. They are producers, accumulators of the fluids, and it is from them that the spirits take the force needful to act on matter. This class of medium is found more or less everywhere, even in very unenlightened surroundings. Their help is purely material, their aptitudes are rather a physical privilege than an indication of moral elevation.

Quite different is the part of the medium in the intellectual phenomena. These are the most interesting of all; it is through them that the identity, the individuality of the invisible Intelligence reveals itself, it is through them that we receive the teachings, and revelations which make of spiritualism not only a field for science research, but also, according to the expression of Sir Russel Wallace "a gospel of truth."

We will pass in review a few of the phenomena:-

Direct writing first claims our attention. Under certain circumstances, papers appear covered with writing of non-human origin.11 I have myself been present at the production of several facts of this kind. One day, for instance, at Orange, during a séance of spiritualism we saw descending over our heads, a morsel of paper which seemed to issue from the ceiling, and, fluttering slowly down it rested in my hat, placed on the table near me. Two lines of delicate writing in verse were traced on it. They expressed a warning or prediction concerning me, which has sinced been fulfilled. Generally, this phenomenon is produced between two slates, closed together, sealed and stamped, and between which a fragment of pencil has been placed. The message is traced in the presence of the spectators, often in a foreign language, unknown to the medium or the people present, and in answer to questions put by the latter.

Dr Gibier made a special study of these manifestations, during thirty-three sittings, with the help of the medium Slade.12 It has been objected that the latter experimented by placing the slates under the table. We will therefore rather cite the case of the medium Eglington, related in the work of Prof. Stainton Moses, of Oxford University, called "Psychography." There, the phenomenon was produced in full light, in the view of all present. In this book there is mention of a séance at which Mr. Gladstone was present. The great English statesman inscribed a question on a slate which he immediately covered by another, putting a morsel of pencil between. The salates were securely tied together and the medium placed on them the tips of his fingers, to establish the fluidic connection. Very soon, the scratching of the pencil was heard. Mr Gladstone's steady gaze was not for an instant diverted from the medium. Under these rigorous conditions, a number of answers were obtained in various languages, several of which were unknown to the medium, answers in perfect accord with the question asked.

Much more common are the phenomena of mediumistic writing. The subject, under occult control, writes on paper communications and messages in which his thought or will have very little or no part. This faculty presents itself under many aspects. It is purely mechanical with certain mediums, who are utterly unconscious, at the moment of writing, of the nature or the meaning of the messages obtained. Indeed many can keep up an animated conversation all the time, or divert their attention and do work in the dark. More frequently it is semi-mechanical, in which case the brain as well as the arm is influenced, and the medium's thought perceives the words as the pencil traces them. Again it may be purely intuitive, and consequently less convincing and more difficult to prove.

The messages obtained by these means offer a great variety of styles and are of very unequal value. The greater number consist of platitudes, but there are many remarkable for their beauty of form and purity of thought, also for the fact that they contain information entirely unknown to the medium, or are written in a language of which he is ignorant, or catian prophecies afterwards realized. Often also, the thoughts expressed are directly opposed to the wishes of the writer.13

Perhaps the best case of automatic writing is that in which the book of Charles Dickens, "The mystery of Edwin Drood," wich was interrupted by the death of the novelist, was finished, under his direction, by an uneducated American medium, and in such a manner that it is impossible to decide, on reading the completed work, at what point the living author laid down his pen and the work of the medium began.

The world of spirits being largely composed of souls who have inhabited this earth, and great intelligence being rare in both places, we can readily understand that the greater number of communications from the beyond should be wanting in grandeur and originality. But almost all have an undoubtedly moral tendency and show good intentions. How many grief-stricken ones have thus been enabled to receive consolation and encouragement from those they have loved and believed they had lost! How many hesitating in the difficult path of duty, have been restored, dissuaded from suicide, armed against their passions, by exhortations from the beyond!

Above these manifestations, whose usefulness is so evident, and whose moral effect is so great, we must yet place certain extraordinary messages, signed in simple fashion or in allegorical terms, but animated by a powerful and living breath, and bearing in their form and teaching, the mark of really superior spirits. It is by means of such documents that the doctrine of spiritualism has been constituted. Allan Kardec received many such. Since his time these sources of superhuman thought have nor turn dry; they continue to well forth for the benefit of mankind.

The phenomena of direct and of automatic writing are completed and confirmed by those of materialisation. Here, the spirits do not stop at writing themselves, or at causing writing to be produced, they speak! They speak by the means of the organs of the medium, who, plunged in a magnetic sleep, gives up his material envelope to invisible personalities, who take possession of it to converse with those present. By this means, suggestive conversations take place between the inhabitants of space and the friends and relations they have left on earth.

Even in the manifestations of mechanical writing, the identity of the spirits is established by the form of the handwriting, by the analogy of the signatures, the familiar forms of expression and even the faults of spelling habitually made in bygone times by these spirits and found once more in their messages, all these peculiarities being of course unknown to the mediums. In the cases of materialization this identity is still more evident. By its attitude, gestures, and remarks, the spirit reveals itself to be the same as in earth life. Those who have known the man in his last incarnation recognize him promptly, his individuality reappears in characteristic forms of speech and in sayings and expressions which he was in the habit of using; indeed, in a thousand psychological details which cannot be analyzed and can only be appreciated by those who have made a close study of these phenomena.

What is more touching than to see a mother come back to exhort and encourage the children she left behind her? What more curious than to see spirits of the most varied sorts animate successively the envelope of a medium, and manifest themselves to those present by word and gesture? For each one, the whole countenance of the medium is transformed, the voice changes, the expression of the features is modified. By its language and its attitude, the personality of the spirit reveals itself, before it has even given its name.

In a circle of experimenters over which we presided, we long possessed two materializing mediums. One of them was used by the guardian spirits of our group. When animated by one of these the features took an angelic expression, the voice became soft and melodious. The language became pure, poetical and elevated, far beyond the personal faculties of the subject. The sight seemed to penetrate into the hearts of those present. The spirit read their thoughts, she spoke successively to each of them, giving advice and warnings touching their moral state and their private life, which showed, even at first interview, a perfect knowledge of their character and the state of their conscience. She spoke to them of intimate things, known only to themselves. She awed them all by her air of majesty, as well as by the wisdom and gentleness of her speech. The impression produced was deep. Everything seemed to vibrate and become illuminated around this spirit. After its departure we felt as if something great had passed from our midst.

Almost always, a second spirit, of a certain elevation, but of quite a different character, took immediate possession of the medium. The second spirit's speech was short and strong, his gestures energetic and dominating. His knowledge was vast. He undertook the direction of the philosophical and moral studies of the group and was able to resolve the most difficult problems. We had a great veneration for him and loved to obey him. But, for a new comer, it was a curious spectacle to see, in the frail envelope of a lady of timid manners and modest acquirements, the successive incarnation of two spirits of such elevated though dissimilar characters.

Our second medium was no less interesting. She was a lady of high education and great elegance, the wife of an officer of high rank, and seemed, according to all appearances, to unite all the requisites for phenomena of the highest kinds. It was just the contrary that happened. This lady was generally used by backward spirits, who had occupied on earth very various positions. It was amusing, for instance, to hear an ex-vegetable-seller of Amiens express herself in the Picardy patois, through the lips of a person of refined and distinguished manners, who had never been in Picardy. The language of the medium, always so correct and choice, became confused, thick, full of faults and lapses and local expressions, during her magnetic sleep, when the spirit of "Sophy" came to us. When the vegetable-woman left, other spirits would take her place, filing so to speak one after the other, through the envelope of the medium and showing us a succession of the most varied types; an ex-sacristan, with an unctuous and slow manner, and speaking low, as if in a church; an ex-public-prosecutor, with his imperious gesture, his mocking tone, his hard and cutting speech, etc.

Often most touching scenes took place, which brought tears from the spectators. Friends from beyond the tomb came and recalled to them recollections of childhood, services rendered, faults committed; told of their manner of life in space, spoke of the joys and sufferings felt after death, according to their way of life on earth. We listened to deep conversations between spirits, to dissertations full of logic and grandeur on the mysteries of life and death, on all the great problems of the universe, and each time, our souls were moved and strengthened. This intimate communion with the invisible world opened to us infinite perspectives of thought and influenced our actions; it shed for us a bright light on the dark and tortuous road of life. A day will come when men will understand the value of such teachings and seek after them. On that day, our outlook will indeed be changed.

After passing rapidly in review the principal phenomena which serve as a basis to modern spiritualism, our résumé would be incomplete if we did not mention the objections presented and the opposing theories, by the help of which it has been sought to explain them.

Firstly, there is absolute negation. Spiritualism, it is said, is but a mass of fraud and tricks. All the extraordinary facts on which it is based are simulated.

It is true that impostors have tried to imitate these phenomena, but their tricks have been easily discovered. A few years ago, an American medium was caught red handed in Paris, and it was the spiritualists themselves who unmasked him. Frauds of this sort are revealed by much less rigorous and minute tests than those to which the real phenomena are subjected. In nearly all the cases quoted above - levitations, apparitions, materializations of spirits - the mediums were bound, and attached to their chairs, frequently also their hands and feet were held by the experimenters. Sometimes the mediums were even placed in specially constructed cages, which were locked, and the key placed in the hands of the operators, who stood around the subject. Sometimes in an excess of precaution, the key was hung from the ceiling. It was under such conditions that numerous cases of materialization took place. After all, the impostures have been of small number, and many of the phenomena have never been imitated, because they are beyond imitation.

The phenomena of spiritualism have been observed, verified and testified to, by the most skeptical men of science, who have passed though all the degrees of incredulity, and who have become convinced little by little, under the continued pressure of facts. The scientists were men of the laboratory, well-known physicists and chemists, doctors and magistrates. They possessed all the requisite qualifications, and were eminently capable of unmasking the cleverest frauds, of detecting the sharpest tricks. The facts of spiritualism have been attested by men occupying the highest positions in the sciences, and whose names are among those honored and respected by mankind at large. After these illustrious men, all those who  have studied these phenomena patiently, conscientiously and perseveringly, affirm their reality, while criticism and denial emanate almost entirely from people who have judged superficially given little time or trouble to researches and experiments, and possessing very insufficient knowledge of them.

There has happened to them what so often happens to inconstant observers. They have obtained but feeble results, sometimes none at all, and they have become more skeptical than ever. They forget the essential point, that spiritualistic phenomena are subject to certain laws and conditions which must be observed and known. Their patience gave out too soon. The proofs they require are not obtained in a few days. Sir W. Crookes, Prof. Russel Wallace, Zollner, Aksakof, Dale Owen, Robert Hare and numerous other scientists studied the question for many years. They did not rest content with attending a few more or less well-conducted séances, with more or less good mediums. They took the trouble to hunt up the facts, to group them, to analyze them; they went to the bottom of the questions. Therefore, their perseverance was crowned with success and their methods of investigating may be recommended to all earnest seekers.

Among the theories most often brought forward to explain away the spiritualistic phenomena, that of hallucination holds the foremost place. But this has ceased to have any foundation, in face of the photographs of spirits obtained by Aksakof, Crookes, Volpi, and so many others. A hallucination cannot be photographed.

The Invisibles do not only impress the photographic plate, but also instruments of precision, such as the Marey registering machines, used by English scientists in their experiments. They lift up material objects, they decompose them, and recompose them, they leave the impression of their hands, feet, or faces in hot paraffin wax.

All these are so many proofs against the theory of either individual or collective hallucination.

Certain people accuse the phenomena of vulgarity, of coarseness, of triviality; they consider them ridiculous. These opinions prove their incompetence. The manifestations cannot differ from what they would have been, coming from the same spirit, had he been living on this earth. Death does not change us, and we are only, in the life beyond, what we have made ourselves in this life. This explains the inferiority of so many discarnate spirits.

On the other hand, these trivial or vulgar manifestations have their use, for they more easily attract attention and best reveal the identity of the spirit. They have convinced  numbers of experimenters of the reality of spirit-survival, and have brought them, little by little, to the study of the more elevated phenomena. For, as we have said, the phenomena are like the links of a chain and follow a graduated order, by virtue of a plan which seems to indicate the action of a power, a higher will, which seeks to draw mankind from its indifference and lead it to the study and discovery of its own destiny.

The physical facts, the talking-tables, the haunted houses, were all needed to attract the attention of men, but they are only a preliminary means, a pathway opened to higher realms of knowledge.

For long spiritualism was considered a ridiculous thing, for long spiritualists were laughed at, mocked and accused of madness. But have not all those who have brought forward a new idea, or a new truth, been called madmen? "A madman" was said of Galileo. "Mad," were called Giordano Bruno, Galvani, Watt, Palissy, Salomon de Caus!

The road of progress is often a rough one to its earliest travelers. It is watered by many tears and much blood. Those we have mentioned fought their way through interests banded together against them. They were despised by some, hated and persecuted by others. They fought and suffered, and compared to them, those who are only mocked at today may consider their lot an easy one. Spiritualists of today may console themselves under the sarcasms levelled at them, by the knowledge that they too bring a benefit, a force, a light to mankind.

In each century history corrects her judgments. That which seemed great becomes small, that which appeared small becomes great. Even today people are beginning to understand that the growth of spiritualism is one of the most important events of modern times, in the evolution of thought, and contains the germ of one of the greatest moral revolutions the world has ever seen.

Whatever mockery it has been the object of, it mus be acknowledged that to spiritualism is due the new psychic science of the day; for without it, and the impetus given by it, all the discoveries due to this science would be still in the future.

As regards the study of spirit-manifestations, spiritualists find themselves in good company.

The illustrious names of Russel Wallace, W. Crookes, Robert Hare, Mapes, Zollner, Aksakof, Boutlerof, Wagner, and Flammarion, have often been quoted. We see also scientists like M. Myers, of Cambridge, Prof. William James of Harvard University, Prof. Lodge of Liverpool, Prof. Richet, Col. de Rochas, who do not consider this study unworthy of them. What must we think then of such accusations of ridicule, of madness? What do they prove, but the sad fact that the reign of blind routine is still powerful in certain quarters. Man is too much inclined to judge things by the narrow horizon of his prejudices and his knowledge. He must raise himself higher, carry his view further and measure his feebleness in the face of the universe. He will thus learn to be modest, and neither to reject nor condemn without examination.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

The attempt has been made to explain all the phenomena of spiritualism by suggestion and double personality. In the experiments, we are told, the medium suggests to himself or obeys the influence of those presente.

Mental suggestion, which is only thought-transference, can, in spite of the difficulties it presents, be understood, and can be established between two organized brains, as, for instance, between the magnetizer and his subject. But can we believe that suggestion can act on a table? Can we admit that inanimate objects should receive and reproduce the impressions of the spectators?

How could we explain on this theory the cases of identity, of revelation of facts, of dates, unknown to the medium and the spectators, such as often occur in these experiments, as well as manifestations contrary to the will of all present.

Often, things yet to happen, as well as facts and details absolutely unknown to every living soul on earth, have been revealed by mediums, and afterwards verified and found to be true. There are some remarkable instances mentioned in Aksakof's book "Animism and Spiritism," and in the work, "Modern Spiritualism," by Prof. Russel Wallace, as also cases of mediumship of very young children, which cannot, any more than the preceding, be explained by suggestion.14

According to Messrs. Janet and Ferré,15 the writing medium is to be compared to a hypnotic subject, who has a personality suggested to him during sleep, and on waking has lost all recollection of this suggestion. The subject unconsciously writes a letter, or tale, referring to this imaginary person. That is, they tell us, the origin of all spirit-messages. This is one of the most cherished theories of our adversaries.

All those who have any experience in this matter know that this explanation is an impossible one. The mediums, writing authomaticaly, are not in a hypnotic sleep. They are wide awake and in possession of all their faculties and their own personality, and it is thus that they write under the control of the spirit. In the experiments of M. Janet, there is always a hypnotizer connected by a magnetic tie to the subject. It is quite different in the spiritualistic séances; none of the spectators act on the medium, and all present are absolutely ignorant as to what will be the kind of spirit who will communicate. Very often, questions are put to the spirits by the incredulous, who are much more disposed to combat the manifestations than to facilitate them.

The phenomena do not only consist in the automatic character of the writing, but especially in the intelligent proofs of the identities supplied. M.Janet's experiments give nothing of the kind. The communications suggested to the subject are always utter platitudes, whereas the messages brought us by the spirits give us indications and revelations as to the present and past life of those we have known on earth, our nearest and dearest, all details being quite unknown to the medium and full of distinct characteristics which distinguish them absolutely from the experiences of hypnotism.

It would be impossible, by suggestion, to cause illiterate persons to write or to obtain by means of a table, such poems as those collected by Mr. Jaubert, President of the Court of Carcassonne; or to cause the apparition of hands and of human forms, or the phenomena of the slates which, sealed together, become covered with writing while held in the hands of those who brought them with them, and never, for one moment laid them down.

We must remember that the doctrine of the spirits has come to us through numerous messages, obtained by writing mediums who were absolutely in ignorance of these teachings. Nearly all of them had been brought up from infancy in the teaching of the Churches, and in the ideas of heaven and hell. Their religious beliefs and notions of a future life were in striking contradiction to the views given by the spirits. They had no idea of reincarnation or the successive lives of the soul, nor of the true condition of the spirit after death, all of which things are found in the messages obtained. This is a fatal objection to the theory of suggestion.

It is of course evident that out of the enormous mass collected, there should be some things weak and inconclusive, also that there are some which may be explained by suggestion. In some circles, people too readily accept all that comes, as emanating from the spirits, and are not careful enough to rigorously put aside all doubtful phenomena. But however wide a margin we leave for these, there remains a most imposing array of manifestations, not to be explained by suggestion, the subliminal-self, hallucination or any other such theory.

Critics always proceed in the same way as regards spiritualism. They take only one order of phenomena and purposely avoid all discussion of what they can neither understand nor refute. If they find a possible explanation for some isolated facts, they immediately conclude that all are alike. Almost always, their explanations are most inaccurate and leave out the most startling proofs of the existence of spirits, and of their intervention in human affairs.

Another theory, often brought forward by objectors, is that of the subliminal-self or double consciousness. Many systems, obscure and complicated, have been evolved from this idea.

According to it, two beings exist in us; one conscious, who knows and is in possession of himself; the other unconscious, who is ignorant of himself, as we are ignorant of him, and who, nevertheless, possesses faculties superior to ours, since to him are to be attributed all the phenomena of magnetism as well as of spiritualism. And not only a second self, but a third, a fourth, and even more are admitted, for certain theorists have stated the existence in man of a great number of personalities, and of various consciences. This system is known as the theory of the poly-conscience.

As M. Charles Richet has shown in his splendid book, "L'homme and L'Intelligence, le Somnambulisme provoqué" (Man and Intelligence and induced Somnambulism), what is called the double personality is nothing but the different states of one and the same personality. Thus, the "unconscious" is but a form of memory; its existence is a hypothesis borrowed, for the needs of the materialistic school, from a tortured and deformed physiology.

The theorists of the "unconscious I" try, by this means, to combat the marvelous, and thereby invent a system much more fantastic and complicated than that to which they object.

Not only is their theory unintelligible, but it does not at all explain the phenomena of spiritualism, for we cannot understand how our unconscious selves can produce visible and tangible forms, intelligent communications by sound or raps, and all the other facts attested by experimenters in all lands. Neither does it explain the more simple phenomenon of second sight.

We should also have to admit that our subliminal selves are first-class liars, as the communicating intelligences in every case and all the world over, claim to be the discarnate spirits of those who have lived on earth.

Almost always, the "unconscious I" is confounded with the fluidic double which is not a being, but an organism, or with the familiar spirit, the guardian angel of the Christians, who is told off to watch over every incarnate soul in this world.

We may well ask ourselves by what universal understanding these unconscious selves hidden in man, who are ignorant of each other's existence and even of their own, are so unanimous, in all occult manifestations, in calling themselves the spirits of the dead.

We have ourselves taken part in innumerable experiences, during between thirty and forty years, not only all over France, but in other countries. Never have the invisibles introduced themselves as subliminal selves, or as the superior "ego" of the medium or of those present, but always as different personalities, enjoying the plenitude of their consciousness, as free individuals, having lived on earth, and having been, in most cases, known to the spectators, and presenting all the characteristics of a human being, with the qualities and defects, weaknesses and greatnesses, to be found in everyone, and giving, by the thousand, the most striking proofs of identity.16

What is most remarkable in all this is the ingenuity displayed by certain thinkers, and their cleverness in constructing the most fantastic theories, to escape from realities which displease them.

Doubtless they have not foreseen the consequences of their systems; they have shut their eyes to the logical results. They have not realized that such fatal doctrines annihilate conscience and personality by dividing them up, and must end in the negation of liberty and responsibility, and consequently, in the destruction of all moral law.

According to this hypothesis, man would be a badly balanced duality or plurality, and each conscience would act independently, without reference to the others. Such a notion would permit, nay, would warrant, all and any excesses.

To resume. - Everything in nature is clear, simple and harmonious. It is the desire for systems which complicates and obscures all things.

From an attentive examination, a constant and profound study of the human being, there results the certainty of the existence in us of three elements: the physical body, the fluidic body, or perispirit, and finally, the soul or spirit. What is called unconscious, or subliminal self, the secondary personality or the higher ego, the poly-conscience, etc., is simply the spirit, which under certain conditions of exteriorisation and of clairvoyance, exhibits a manifestation of hidden powers, an awakening of long-slumbering souvenirs, an assemblage of resources which have been accumulated in previous existences, and which have temporarily been hidden under the veil of flesh.

No, indeed, man has not several egos. The psychical unity of being is the essential condition of his liberty and of his responsibility. But there are in him several states of consciousness. As the spirit disengages itself from matter and frees itself from its carnal envelope, its faculties and perceptions are sharpened, it recollections awake, its personality is enlarged. This is what is sometimes produced in the magnetic sleep. In this state, the thick veil of matter is lifted, and the latent powers reappear. It is these manifestations of the same being, which have led to the belief in a double personality, or plurality of egos.

Nevertheless, this does not suffice to explain the phenomena of spiritualism. In the great majority of cases, the intervention of outside intelligences, of free and untrammeled wills, presents itself as the only rational explanation.

We only mention for the sake of completeness the theory which attributes these manifestations to the devil. This is a very out-of-date argument, for it has been used in all ages and against almost every innovation. "We judge the tree by its fruits," as the scripture tells us. If we measure all the moral good that spiritualism has already done in the world; if we consider how many skeptics and indifferent or sensual people have been guided by it to a higher and purer conception of life, justice and duty, how many atheists have been brought back to a belief in God, we must conclude that the devil, if he is working in the phenomena from beyond the tomb, works against himself, and to the detriment of his own interests. What we have said elsewhere 17 of hell and the devil render it unnecessary that we should linger on the subject. Satan is only a myth. No created being is eternally given over to evil.

If the great majority of criticisms on spiritualism are unjust and erroneous, we must acknowledge that among them there are some which have a foundation. Many abuses check the advance and development of modern spiritualism. These abuses must be attributed, not to the idea itself, but to the bad application sometimes made of it. Is it not thus in all things human? There is no idea, however holy, however venerable it may be, which has not engendered abuses; it is the inevitable consequence of the inferiority of our world.

In what concerns spiritualism, we must give warning not only against paid mediumship, which sometimes tempts certain subjects to try to imitate the phenomena, but also against the unfortunate practices of some groups which are unprepared, ill-directed, and foolish. Many people make of spiritualism a frivolous game; and by what they call "the dance of the tables," attract to themselves inferior and foolish spirits who do not scruple to play tricks on them, and form a connection with them which sometimes goes as far as an obsession.

Others give themselves up without control to mediumistic writing and obtain an abundance of messages signed with celebrated names though of a very ordinary character, wanting in style and in originality.

In some cases, these practices have given rise to the belief in the intervention of devils, when it was but a case of vulgar and backward spirits. It only requires some experience of these things to the able to distinguish the nature of the invisible beings and guard oneself against the ambushes of backward spirits.

The abuses of which we speak are often pointed out and purposely exaggerated, and have constantly been used to combat modern spiritualism. It is a grave error to see only these inconveniences in spiritualism, and under pretext of avoiding them, seek to deprive humanity of the very real and great advantages which it may enjoy by a serious study and wise practice of mediumship.

As to the dangers presented by spiritualism, they may easily be avoided by banishing from the séances all frivolous thoughts, all interested motives, and making the evocations in a pure and elevated spirit. "Like attracts like," says the proverb. Nothing is more true in occult studies. The silly questions and easy jokes certain people indulge in attract joking spirits. And, on the contrary, serious an earnest thoughts and intentions please the higher intelligences.

It is dangerous to work alone, without verification efficient protection, dangerous to give oneself up alone to the evocation of spirits. To avoid bad influences and vulgar manifestations, it is best to join with a number of enlightened and well-meaning people, under the direction of some one with experience of the subject. Under these circumstances, ask of God to permit a high spirit to give you its help, to keep away the wanderers of the dark, to assist the communication with your group of those you loved and believed you had lost, and ask the superior intelligences to give you their instruction, to guide you in the way of spirit-intercourse. If your sentiments are disinterested, if you seek only in these studies a means of improvement, they will gladly answer to your call.

 .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   . 

It results from our examination that we have arrived at a decisive hour in the history of science.

Experimental science has crossed the boundary which separates the two worlds, the visible and the invisible. She finds herself face to face with a living infinity. Prof. Charles Richet, of the Academy of Medicine of Paris, said, in his report on the spiritualistic séances held in Milan: "A new world is opening before us." During the last half century, slowly but surely, science has been moving from discovery to discovery, towards a knowledge of fluidic life, the life invisible, in perfect accord with the teachings of modern spiritualism; from this accord man draws the most powerful certitude he has ever had of the survival of the soul and its indestructibility.

At the present moment, this question has been decided by the many scientists who have studied it, but not by science as a whole, which still hesitates, but whose affirmative verdict must soon be pronounced. Above the question of private interests, of rivalry between different schools, above sophistry and contradictions, this problem presents itself imperiously before the tribunal of thought.

In the face of the facts of spiritualism, of their persistence, of their incessant recurrence and their prodigious variety, science must pronounce itself and say whether death is annihilation or if there is a human destiny beyond.

All schools are interested in the solution of this problem; and in knowing if, as we maintain, there is objective proof of survival, apart from all mystical character.

The materialistic schools on the one hand and the Churches on the other, are upset and agitated, seeing only a reason for their own decadence and downfall, where on the contrary is the way of reconciliation.

But whatever be the indecision of science, the opposition of the schools, and the obstinacy with which they combat the new idea and the discoveries to which it gives rise, the invisible powers which work in the world display no less energy and tenacity in defending and propagating them; for, above the interests of the schools, theories and systems, there is one thing which must triumph and be recognized by all, and that is truth.

The invisible has encroached little by little on the visible, and in spite of contempt, hostility and resistance, it has become evident that its action will continue to spread more and more and increase, until man comes to know himself, and to discern the law of his life and destiny.

There is here the germ of a revolution which will sweep through the whole domain of human knowledge.

Firstly, from a scientific point of view, these facts open to us a whole world of forces, of influences, of forms of life, in the midst of which we were plunged without ever suspecting their existence, a world whose grandeur, riches, and reserves of force, defy all calculation.

We also learn to see in man the seat of hidden faculties and powers, the use and development of which will raise him to undreamed of heights.

Life appears to us under a double aspect: corporeal and fluidic. The existence of man is alternatively terrestrial and extra-terrestrial. It is accomplished on earth, in the flesh; afterwards in the atmosphere, or in space, always in a human form, but impalpable and imponderable. These two modes of life follow each other in a harmonious rhythm, as day succeeds night, as waking follows sleep, as summer comes after winter.

From a philosophic and moral point of view, the consequences of these phenomena are no less considerable.

For over fifty years past, these facts have been attested. When from the facts we try to reach the causes which produce them, and formulate the laws which governs them, we find ourselves in presence of an order of things which forces on us a new conception of the universe and of life. Not only are we obliged to recognize the existence of of invisible beings who are the spirits of the dead, but we also see that these beings are united by close bonds of brotherhood, and are moving towards a common object, towards ever more and more elevated states.

By this conception, all ideas of law. progress, justice, and duty, have a new light shed upon them. The feeling of moral responsibility is increased. We begin to perceive the remedy we were awaiting, the remedy for the ills, and misery which weighs so heavily on mankind.

For, curiously enough, this revelation comes at the precise moment when all doctrines are sinking under the weight of time, when all religions are crumbling, and man is reduced to seeking his way in the night. It comes in the hour when society is worked upon by immense destructive forces, when, from deep down among the masses, arises to heaven a cry of suffering and of despair.

It is at this moment that messages of peace, of hope and of love, reach us from the powers of space, and the spirits of light who come to minister to a troubled world.

1 See chapter V.
 
2 "Miracles and Modern Spiritualism." Sir Russel Wallace, page 101. Edition of 1901.
 
3 See the communication of Dr Baraduc to the Photographic Congress at Bar; that of Dr Luys to the Society of Biology (June 1897) and the work of Dr Baraduc, "The human Soul, its movements and its lights."
 4 See "Revue Spirite," Nov. 1894, with facsimile, and also the works of Col. de Rochas, "L'Extériorisation de la Sensibilité et de la Motricité." Chaumel. The same results are mentioned in the case of the medium Herrod. Also stated by Judge Carter, in "Animism and Spiritism," by Aksakof; and Mr Glendening, ("Bordeland" for July 1896) and others.
 5 "Aprés la Mort," "After Death," p. 191, by the same author.
 6 For full description, see "Evolution Animique," by Gabrielle Delanne.
 
7 To the newspaper Le Matin.
 
8 See "Le Psychisme expérimental," by Erny, p. 184.
 
9 "Aprés la Mort," latest edition, pp. 182-184.
 
10 The edition of "Christianisme et Spiritism" from which this translation is made was published several years ago, therefore the enormous mass of more recent confirmatory experiments is not mentioned, - Translator's Note.
 
11 See "La réalité des Esprits, Ecriture directe," by Baron Guldenstubb.
 
12 See "Spiritism ou Fakirisme occidental," by Dr Gibier, Director of the Pasteur Institute of New York.
 13 See "Spirit-teachings," by Rev. Stainton Moses.
 
14 See note 13.
 15 "Automatisme psychologique," by P. Janet.
16 See note 11.
17  "Aprés la Mort," pp. 103 and 261

CHAPTER X

THE NEW REVELATION - THE DOCTRINE OF THE SPIRITS


Modern spiritualism, we have said, is a new form of the eternal revelation.

To us, revelation simply means the action of lifting a veil and uncovering hidden things.

From this point of view, all sciences are revelations, but there is one higher than others, that of moral truths, which comes to us through the celestial missionaries, and most often through the inspirations of conscience.

All times and all peoples have had their part in revelation, which is not, as many have thought, a thing accomplished at a given time, in a predetermined place, once for all. It is perpetual, incessant; it is the work of the human spirit in its efforts to raise itself, under the influence of the divine spirit, to the knowledge of law and life. This influence is often at work without man's knowledge. It is by human means that God acts on man, as well in the domain of historical facts as in that of thought and science.

As history unrolls itself, as the immense caravan of humanity fares onward through the centuries, a brightening light grows in us and around us. The mystic Power which, out of space, follows and directs this march, according to our degree of evolution and comprehension, giving us new vies of the great problem of the universe and of life.

The revelations of past centuries have done their work. Each has been an advance on the one before, marking the successive stages of humanity, but they fail to answer to the need of today, for the law of progress is constantly in operation, and, as man advances and raises himself, his horizons must be enlarged. That is why a dispensation, greater than those before, is today given to the world.

We must also remember that if every great epoch has had its prophets, if powerful spirits have brought to man, according to the times and places, the elements of truth and progress, the germs which they sowed have too often remained sterile. Their doctrines, misunderstood, have given rise to religions which mutually excluded and condemned each other unjustly, for all beliefs are related to one another and rest on the same two foundations, God and immortality. Besides divine messengers, many false prophets have arisen. Pretended revelations have sought to impress the people, confused and contradictory doctrines have been spread, for the apparent profit of a few, but to the hurt of all.

That is why, to prevent such abuses, the new revelation takes another form. It is not an individual one, and is not produced in a narrow circle. It is given on all points of our globe to those who seek it, through people of all ages, of all nations, of all conditions of life, by means of innumerable messages, the value of which is determined by the most rigorous examination.

The new revelation is impersonal and universal. It is the work of the great spirits of space, who come in their millions, to instruct and benefit mankind. Its work is to interpret and coordinate the revelation of the past, which, contained in the sacred books of the different human races, were veiled under symbols and parables.

The new revelation, divested of all material form, manifests itself directly to those whose intellectual development has become qualified to examine the great problem of destiny.

The way has been prepared by the study of natural science, on which it rests, and on the knowledge gradually acquired by the human spirit. This work, this knowledge, is mad fruitful by it, and united, forming a solid whole.

The Christian revelation succeeded the Mosaic. That of the spirits completes both. Christ Himself announced it,1and we may say that He Himself presides over this new development of thought.

The revelation of the spirits is not manifested by orthodox channels, therefore the Church rejects it, but the Christian revelation met with the same fate at the hands of the Jewish priesthood. The Christian clergy of today find themselves in the same position as that of the priests of Israel, two thousand years ago, towards Christianity. This historical comparison should give them food for thought.

The new revelation manifests itself outside of and above the Churches. Its teaching is addressed to all the races of the earth. Everywhere, the spirits proclaim this fundamental principle. Over all the religions of the world is heard the great voice which recalls man to the thought of God and of the future life. Above the din of useless agitation and vain discussions, above the struggle of interests and conflict of passions, the voice is heard from the depths  of space offering to all, with the teachings of truth, divine hope and peace.

This is the revelation predicted from all time. By it, all the teachings of the past, partial, restricted, limited in their action, are surpassed and enshrouded. It utilizes all the materials gathered together by them, unites and cements them, to form a vast edifice of truth in which our thoughts can dwell at ease. It opens a new and decisive era in the evolution of man.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .

Nevertheless, we cannot pass over in silence the numerous objections which have been made to the doctrine of the spirits. In spite of the grandeur of the new revelation, many have seen in it merely another system, a speculative theory. Even among those who admit the reality of the phenomena, we find some who accuse spiritualists of having founded on these facts a premature doctrine, thus diminishing the positive character of modern spiritualism.

Those who speak in this fashion have not understood the true nature of spiritualism. It is not, as they aver, a doctrine hastily put together; still less a preconceived theory; it is but the logical consequence of the facts, their natural consummation.

For more than half a century, the communications established with the invisible world have continued to afford us indications, numerous as they are precise, of the conditions of life in the hereafter. The spirits, in the messages they give us in such abundance, by automatic writing, "rappings," or by reappearance in human form, in a word, by all the means at their disposal, give very detailed descriptions of their mode of existence after death. They relate the impressions received at their separation from the body, the disappointments or pleasures they have felt, according to their way of life on earth. From all these descriptions, compared, tested one with another, we get a very clear idea of the future life and the laws which govern it.

The higher intelligences, in their intercourse with man, complete these indications. They confirm the information given by less advanced spirits; rising still higher, they give us their views and opinions on all the great problems of life and death; on the general evolution of beings, and the higher laws of the universe. All these revelations agree and combine to make a grand philosophy.

Some have thought they detected variations in the teachings of the spirits, but these divergences are more apparent than real. They most often consist in the form or expressions of the idea, and not in the subject matter itself. They vanish before a thorough examination. We have an example in the references to the successive reincarnations of the soul.

This has been used as a weapon against spiritualism, because in Anglo-Saxon countries, a certain number of spirits have seemed to deny the reincarnation of souls on earth, but the spirits everywhere affirm the principle of successive existences, with the single reservation, that in the limited area we have mentioned, reincarnation takes place, not on earth, but in other worlds. There is, therefore, but a difference of place; the principle remains intact.

If the spirits in some countries, influenced by tenacious prejudices, have been obliged, in the meantime, to pass over in silence some points of their teaching, is it not, as they themselves have admitted, in order to spare certain strong feelings of race and color? This is proved by the fact that the number of anti-reincarnationists, in America as in England, is diminishing every day, whereas the partisans of reincarnation have steadily increased.

It is objected that the spirits who come to us are not all of an elevated order. Some of them have very narrow views, and very imperfect knowledge on all subjects. Others are still imbued with earthly prejudices; their ideas reflect the surroundings in which they lived.

Death does not change us, as we have said.2 There is no abrupt transformation in our journey to the infinite. It is only to the after numerous existences that the spirit frees itself from its passions, errors, and weaknesses, and rises to wisdom and light.

The result of this state of things is necessarily a great variety, a great diversity of positions among the invisible inhabitants of space. Their communications are of very unequal value, according to their origin, and require careful scrutiny. They must be sifted by our reason and judgment.

But modern spiritualism does not dogmatize or remain stationary. It does not pretend to infallibility. Although superior to those preceding it, the spiritualistic teaching of today is progressive, as are the spirits themselves. It develops and completes itself, as, by experience progress is made in the two humanities, that of the earth and that of space, humanities which intermingle, and of which we successively form units.

The principles of modern spiritualism have been given forth, established and fixed by numerous documents derived from the most diverse mediums, all harmonizing among themselves.

Allan Kardec, and after him all spiritualistic writers, have examined carefully and in detail the messages from beyond the tomb. By grouping and harmonizing those identical in matter they have assembled the elements of a rational teaching, which furnish a satisfactory explanation of all the problems hitherto insoluble. This teaching is always capable of verification, as the source from which it emanates is always available. The communication established between men and spirits is permanent and universal, and increases with the progress of mankind.

It is true that obscure and backward spirits abound around us, but we must not lose sight of the fact that the high spirits, descending from the spheres of light, also come to bring to the earth those sublime teachings which, once heard, are never forgotten. It is impossible to mistake them. Those who have been fortunate enough to hear their instruction cannot forget the impression received. It is easy to perceive that their language is not of this earth, but comes from a higher sphere.

Those radiant spirits are often joined by our nearest and dearest, whom we have loved here below, and to whose fate we cannot remain indifferent. As soon as the identity of these dear ones is established in our eyes, as soon as their personality affirms itself in a thousand different ways, there awakes in us an overpowering desire to learn the conditions of their new life. How could we remain deaf, indifferent to the voices of those who have held us in their arms, and have been near akin to ourselves?

The affection which unites us to our dead, this sentiment which raises us above the dust of the earth and distinguishes us from the lower animals, does it not compel us to examine with care all that they reveal to us, touching those great problems of destiny which have hovered for so many centuries above human thought. Are not those who see only the experimental side of spiritualism, the physical facts, and who are skeptical as to the results, preferring the shell to the nut, the binding to the contents of the book? They do not follow the wise advice of Rabelais: "Break the bone, and extract the marrow." It is indeed a strengthening marrow, this teaching; it cures us of the fear of death, it arms us for a successful struggle, for the conquest of the high intellectual summits.

One whole side of spiritualism is scientific, and rests on undeniable facts, on positive proofs, but it is especially its moral consequences which interest humanity. Experiment and minute analysis of the facts are not within the reach of all.

The poor, the humble, who form the mass of the people, have often neither the time nor the apparatus for the study of the phenomena, and it is precisely those who most need the benefit of it.

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

The doctrine of the spirits can be classed under three headings: the nature of the being; its destiny; and the higher laws of the universe. We will take them in succession.

The most essential study for us is that of ourselves. It is above all imperative that we should know what we are and this is just the problem which, until now, has been the most obscure. Today, the knowledge of the inner nature of man comes to us from the communications of the spirits, as well as from the direct observations of the phenomena of spiritualism and somnambulism.

Man has two bodies, the material, which puts him in contact with the physical world; and the fluidic, through which he is in touch with the invisible world.

The physical body is perishable and crumbles away at death; it is a garment put on for our earthly journey. The fluidic body is indestructible, and becomes refined and purified during the progress of the soul, of which it is the permanent, inseparable envelop. It is the real body, the type of corporeal creation, the mold in which is formed the plan of physical life. On it the organs are modeled, the cells are grouped; and it cause them to operate. The perispirit or fluidic body is the agent of all the manifestations of life, for man on earth, and for the spirit in space. It contains the vitality needful for the birth and development of the being.

The knowledge accumulated in our previous lives, the recollections of our past existences, are summarized and registered in the perispirit. Exempt from the constant changes of the material body, it is imperishable seat of memory, and assures its preservation.

The admirable plan of life reveals itself in the inner constitution of the human being.

Man being called on to inhabit alternately two different worlds, his organism must contain all the elements required to put him in connection with these worlds and assist in his work of progression and in the development of the senses we now possess. The perispirit contains also the germs of new senses which will be born and manifest themselves in the course of our future existences, widening more and more the field of our experiences.

Our modes of perception are proportionate to our degree of advancement, and in direct relation to our surroundings. All follows and harmonizes in physical nature as in the moral order. An organism superior to ours would have no raison d'être in a world where man is trying his first steps and stumbling through the early stages of his infinite journey. But our senses are capable of being perfected indefinitely. The present man possesses all the elements of his future greatness. By a general progress he will discover, in all things around him, properties and qualities hitherto unknown to him. He will learn to know forces and powers, the existence of which he does not even suspect, for there is in his present imperfect organism no possible point of contact with them.

The study of the perispirit even now shows us how man can live simultaneously the physical life and the free life of space. The phenomena of somnambulism, of the freeing of the fluidic body, and vision at a distance or "second sight," are some phases of this exterior life of which we have no consciousness during our waking state. The spirit in the flesh, is like a prisoner in his cell, the state of somnambulism or of mediumship frees it and permits it to extend more or less the circle of its perceptions, while yet remaining attached to its envelope. Death provides its complete emancipation.

These diverse forms of life correspond to the various degrees of consciousness and of knowledge; becoming more elevated as the spirit grows freer and more advanced in the scale of perfection.

It is by careful observation of these different aspects of life that we shall arrive at the complete knowledge of our being, and man will cease to be a mystery to himself.

The duty of science is to study the hidden sources of life. As long as she confines her observations to the physical body, which is but an exterior and superficial manifestation, physiology and medicine will remain powerless and sterile.

We have shown, by certain experiments of photography and materialization,
3
how the fluidic body emits vibrations and radiations varying in form and intensity, according to the mental state. These are positive demonstrations of the fact, stated in messages from the beyond, that the power of radiation of the spirit and the extent of its field of perception, vary alway in proportion to its degree of elevation. The purity and transparency of the fluidic envelope are, in space, the test of the position of the soul; the refinement of its constituent elements and the rapidity of its vibrations increases with this purification. As the moral nature develops, new physical conditions appear in the fluidic body.

The thoughts and actions of the being react constantly on his envelope, and according to their nature, materialize it, or render it more ethereal. Persistent study, prayer, good actions, the fulfillment of duty, are so many factors in the ascension of the soul. By prolonged intellectual and moral training, meritorious living, generous aspirations and great sacrifices, the radiation of the spirit gradually increases, the vibrations of its perispirit become more frequent, its brilliancy becomes greater and the density of its envelope decreases. These phenomena are produced in the opposite direction in those inclined to violent passions and sensual pleasures; their mode of life causes an increase of density in the fluidic body, a reduction of rapidity of vibration, from which come the darkening of the senses and the diminution of the perceptions in the life of space.

The vicious spirit, by persisting in evil courses, can make of its organism a veritable tomb, in which after death, it s buried until a new incarnation takes place. We can therefore understand how each of us is the maker of his own happiness or misery, elevation or abasement. Man creates his destiny by his actions; the partition of good and evil is therefore a mathematical result of the merits and efforts of each of us.

Man has two bodies, but they are merely envelopes or garments, the one ethereal and enduring, the other material and changing. It is the soul of man which is the real thinking and conscious ego.

W
e give the name of spirit to the soul clothed in its fluidic body. The soul is the center of the life of the perispirit, as the latter is the center of the life of the physical organism. The soul feels, thinks and wills; the physical body, joined to the fluidic body, constitutes the double organism by the aid of which it acts on the world of matter.

Death is the operation by which these elements are separated. The physical body crumbles away and returns to the earth. The soul, clothed in its fluidic body, becomes once more free and independent, and such as it has made itself, intellectually and morally, in the course of the existences it has passed through.

Death does not change it but only restores, by liberating it, the fullness of its faculties, and knowledge, and the recollection of its former lives. The fields of space are opened before it. The spirit takes flight, and rises higher according as its essence is refined and less weighted with the impure elements accumulated by earthly passions and material habits.

There are then for the human spirit three states; life in the flesh, the state of disengagement or partial separation during sleep, and the free life of space. These states correspond to the three worlds in which the soul must work out its constant progress; the material world, the fluidic world, and the higher world. By its passage through them, during eternity, it realizes all that is good, true, and beautiful, and gains the love that brings it near to God.


.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   


 The law of destiny, as we learn from the preceding considerations, consists in the progressive development of the soul, which makes its own future; it is the rational evolution of all beings, starting from the same perfection. Its successive existences are passed alternately in space and on the surface of the worlds, through innumerable ages; but all these lives are connected by the law of cause and effect. Our present life is, for each of us, a legacy of the past and the preparation for the future.

Human life is a school and a field of work; the life of space which follows it is the result. The spirit reaps in the light that which he has sown in the shadows, and often in sorrow.

For souls drawn towards matter, life in space is a life of privation and of misery; it is the absence of all that could give them pleasure, for all pleasures are those of the intelligence and of the heart. Spirits who have freed themselves from their material habits, and learned to live in the exercise of the lofty faculties of the soul, find, on the contrary, surroundings to suit their taste and a vast field open to their activity. This is only a wide application of the law of attraction and of affinity; only the natural consequences of our own actions.

After a time of rest in space, the soul is reborn to humanity, bringing with it the results and products of its former lives. This explains the intellectual and moral inequalities which we see among the inhabitants of our earth. The inborn superiority of some men is the fruit of their past efforts. We are younger or older spirits, we have worked more or less, acquired more or less virtue and knowledge. Thus, the infinite variety of characters, of aptitudes and of tastes, ceases to be an enigma.

Nevertheless, the reincarnated soul cannot always utilize, in their entirety, the powers and faculties acquired. It has at its disposal here below only a very imperfect organism which has retained no recollection of other times. But the past remains in it, its intuitions and tendencies are proofs thereof.

The innate faculties of some children, infant phenomena, artists, musicians, painters, scientists, bear glaring testimony to the existence of this law. Sometimes also, proud and selfish souls are reborn in sickly and infirm bodies, to humble themselves, and acquire the virtues in which they are lacking; patience, submission, and resignation.

All lives of suffering, all existences of struggle, are explained in the same way. They are transitory but necessary phases of the immortal life; every soul will know them in its turn. Trial and suffering are so many means of reparation, of education, and elevation, it is by them that soul effaces a guilty past and regains lost time. By them characters are formed; experience is acquired, man is prepared for further ascensions. The soul which suffers seeks after God, remembers to pray to Him and thus draws near to Him.

Each human being, on returning to this world, loses the memory of his past, which is registered in the perispirit, but disappears for the time under the envelope of flesh. This is a physical necessity. This temporary forgetfulness of our previous existences, these alternations of light and darkness, strange as they may seem at first sight, are easily explained. If our present memory does not suffice to recall to us our first years of childhood, it is not astonishing that we should have forgotten the lives which were separated one from the other by a long sojourn in space. The states of sleep and of waking through which we pass each day, as well as the experiences of hypnotism and somnambulism, prove to us that we can temporarily forget our normal existence, without thereby losing our personality. Eclipses of like nature, concerning our past existences, have therefore nothing astonishing about them. Our memory loses and finds itself throughout the succession of our lives, as during the succession of days and of nights which form our present existence.

From a moral point of view, the remembrance of our previous lives would cause, here below, very great perturbations. All criminals, reborn to reinstate themselves, would be recognized, rejected, despised; and they themselves would be terrified and, as it were, hypnotized by their own recollections. The reparation of the past would become impossible, the present unbearable. It would be the same, in different degrees, with all those whose past is stained. Recollections of the past would introduce into social life hatred and elements of discord, which would aggravate the situation and check amelioration. The heavy burden of errors and of faults, the sight of shameful actions inscribed on its history, would weigh down the soul and paralyze its initiative. In those around, it would recognize enemies, persecutors, rivals, it would feel reawakened and rekindled in itself the evil passions which it was the object of its new existence to destroy or at least to attenuate.

The knowledge of past existences would perpetuate in us, not only the succession of facts of which they were composed, but the habits of routine, the narrow views, the foolish obstinate tendencies which were inherent in each. We still find traces of these in many people.

When we consider everything carefully, we see that the temporary effacement of the past is indispensable to the work of reparation, and that Providence, in depriving us of our far-off memories, has acted with great wisdom.

Souls are drawn together by reason of their affinity to each other. They form groups or families the members of which follow and help each other during their successive incarnations. Powerful bonds unite them; numerous lives passed together create in them that similarity of views and of character so often seen in families. There are, however, exceptions. Certain spirits change their surroundings so as to progress more rapidly. In this, as in all the important acts of life, there is a part reserved to the freewill of each being, who may thus, in a certain measure, and according to his degree of elevation, choose the condition into which he is to be reborn. But there is also the part of destiny, or divine law, which, from on high, fixes the order of rebirths.


    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   . 

The plurality of lives of the soul and its ascension in the scale of the world constitutes the essential point in the teaching of modern spiritualism. We have lived before birth and we shall live after death. Our lives are the successive stages in our great journey towards eternal truth, good, and beauty.

By the doctrine of preexistence and of reincarnation, all becomes connected, illuminated, and comprehensible; divine justice appears, and harmony reigns in the universe and in our destinies.

The soul is no longer supposed to be created by a capricious God who distributes, at haphazard and according to His own pleasure, vice and virtue, genius and imbecility. Created simple and ignorant, the soul rises by its own efforts, enriches itself by reaping in the present that which it has sown in the past, and sows now for the future.

The soul constructs its own destiny, rising degree by degree from the inferior and rudimentary state to that of the highest personality; from the unconsciousness of the savage to the state of those sublime beings who illuminate the highway of history and pass like a ray of divine light over this earth.

Thus considered, reincarnation becomes a comforting and strengthening truth, a symbol of peace among men. It points out to all the way of progress, the great justice of a God who does not punish eternally, but permits the sinner to redeem himself by suffering.

Although inflexible, this law proportions the reparation to the fault, and, after the redemption, shows us regeneration. It draws the bonds of human brotherhood closer by teaching those who are shocked by the social inequalities and differences among men, that in reality all have the same origin and the same future. There are no favored ones and none disinherited, since the final result is the same for all, if all will work for it.

The law of reincarnation puts a check on our passions by showing us the consequences of our actions, words and thoughts, consequences not confined to this life, but sowing the seeds of future happiness or misfortune. We thereby learn to watch over ourselves, to be on our guard, to prepare our future.

The man who has understood the grandeur of this doctrine, can no longer accuse God of injustice and of partiality. He will know that each one occupies his proper place in this world, that every soul is subjected to the trials it has merited or desired. He will thank the Eternal for having thus given him the means of repairing his faults and requiring, by constant effort, an atom of His power, a reflection of His wisdom, a spark of His love.

This is the role of man and his grand work; to be a collaborator with God, by spreading around him order, truth, justice and harmony, by drawing to him his humbler brethren, and helping them to attain the divine heights which he himself is scaling towards God, the Perfect Being, the living and conscious law of the Universe, the eternal source of love and of life.

Thus is resolved the problem of evil. Evil is but and effect of contrast, it has no separate existence. Evil is to good what shadow is to light. We only appreciate the latter after being deprived of it; thus, without sorrow, we would not know joy; without privation, we could not feel the happiness of possession.

All is explained and becomes clear in the divine plan when it is looked at from a lofty point of view. The law of progress rules infinite life and makes the splendor of the universe. Thus seen, the problem of destiny is but the logical application and consecration of that law of evolution of which so many thinkers of our day have had, according to their state of mind, a vague intuition or a clear vision. It is the great law which governs all.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   

The general plan of the universe has appeared to us from the preceding exposition. It only remains for us to point out the essential features.

The teaching of the spirits shows us everywhere the unity of law and of substance. By this unity, order and harmony reign throughout all.

The invisible world differs only from the visible in regard to our senses.  The invisible is but the continuation, the natural prolongation, of the visible. When combined they form an inseparable whole; but it is in the invisible that we must seek for the causes, the center of all activity and all the subtle forces of the Cosmos.

Force and energy, science tells us, moves matter and directs the worlds through space. What is force? According to the new revelation, it is but the agent, the mode of action of a superior will. It is God's thought which gives movement and life to the universe!

The existence of God is affirmed by all exalted spirits. Those who have tasted of the cup of modern spiritualism know that the great spirits of space are unanimous in proclaiming, in recognizing, the supreme Intelligence which governs the worlds. They add that this Intelligence is revealed the more clearly as progress is made in the spiritual life.

It is the same with all the writers and philosophers of spiritualism, from Allan Kardec down to the present day. All affirm the existence of a supreme cause. "There is no effect without a cause," says Kardec, "and all intelligent effect must necessarily have an intelligent cause."

It is on this axiom that the whole of spiritualism reposes. When we apply it to the manifestations from beyond the tomb, this axiom reveals the existence of the spirits. Thus, if we apply it to the study of the world and the universal laws, it shows the necessity of an intelligent cause. That is why the existence of God constitutes one of the essential points of spiritualistic teaching.

Spirits, like men, are unequally developed, and cannot all see after the same fashion, for which reason we get from them more or less varying conceptions of the divine Being. But it suffices that there should be intelligence and consciousness in created beings for us to know that they exist in the creating source; in that supreme Unity which is not, as some say, the first cause, or, as others think, the final cause, but the Eternal cause, forever acting, from which all life emanates.

The solidarity which unites all created being has no other center than this universal and divine Unity. Through it alone we can know the object of life and its laws, since it is itself the living reason and law of the universe as well as the basis of morality.

When we study the problem of the Beyond, of the position of the soul after death, we find ourselves in the presence of a state of things regulated by a law of justice, which executes itself, without tribunal and without judgment, but from which none of our actions or thoughts can escape.

This idea of law is inseparable from the idea of intelligence. Otherwise the universal laws would not be distinguishable from the blind and mechanical laws of materialism.
We often hear of the blind laws of nature. What is meant by this expression? Blind laws can only act at random. Hazard would be the absence of plan, of intelligent direction; it would be the negation of all law. Chance cannot create unity and harmony, but only incoherence and confusion. That is why a law can only be the manifestation of a sovereign intelligence, of a noble thought. It is thought alone which can dispose and combine all things in the universe. And thought cannot be produced without the being who generates it.
Universal laws cannot repose upon such a changeable foundation as chance, but must necessarily have an immutable basis, else they would drift aimlessly, they would cease to be laws. All things, forces as well as beings, worlds and races, are governed by intelligence.

Many misunderstandings have divide the world on these questions; modern spiritualism has come to dissipate them. Until now, materialists have sought for the secret of universal life where it is not, namely, in effects; Christians, on the other hand have sought for it outside nature. We understand today that the eternal cause of the world is not exterior to the world, but interior, it is the very soul, life and essence of it; as our soul is the life or center in us.

Ignorance of these things is the principle cause of our errors, it is ignorance which leads man to actions the consequences of which accumulate and crush him.

The divine creation cannot be measured in time or in space. It shines forth in the skies in multitudes of suns, and is revealed on earth in the humblest floweret as in in the giants of the forest. God is infinite, His creation is eternal. One cannot conceive of creation coming out of nothing, for nothing has no existence. Creation is incessant, and the universe, immutable as a whole, is under constant transformation as to its parts.

With all its worlds, visible and invisible, its celestial spaces, its planetary and sidereal populations, the universe appears to us as an immense factory, in which everything which moves and breathes, works for the production, the keeping up and the development of life. Every globe, rolling through space, is the abode of a human society. The earth is but one of the most insignificant of the great hierarchy of worlds, the earthly society, one of the most inferior. But it will constantly improve, and our sphere will one day become an abode of bliss.

All is transformed and renewed by the incessant rhythm of life and of death. While some stars are extinguished, others are lighted up. That is why the poet tells us that there are cradles and tombs in the sky. Like man, worlds are born, live and die, constellations are dissolved, all forms pass and fade away, but infinite life survives in its eternal splendor.

An admirable plan is being carried out; God alone knows the whole. We see only a few lines of it, and even that fragment dazzles us. But our comprehension of divine things increase with our development; our faculties and senses, as they expand, open to us new horizon on the higher worlds.

In the same way, the chain of our lives unrolls, through the ages, its brilliant or tarnished links. Events follow events, without apparent connection, but Infallible Justice fixes the course thereof according to unchangeable laws.  All is connected, in the moral as well as the material realms.

Consider for a moment the beliefs of the past: the earth, the center of the universe and the only inhabited planet; one short and only life for man out of the infinity of time, life after which he is judged and disposed of for eternity; compare with these the revelations of space, that universe without boundaries, peopled by suns, with their accompanying secondary worlds, the cities, the innumerable peoples which inhabit them, with their varied civilizations, and the marvelous works done therein. Think of this future for the soul, destined to be reborn from life to life in these worlds, to ascend from one to another, like the steps of a gigantic ladder, participating in social states so superior to ours, that nothing, in our feeble earthly conceptions, can give us any idea of them. And the soul, in its endless progress, acquires ever new qualities, greater powers which render it fit to play a higher and higher part in the universe.

There are therefore, no elect, an no damned. Mankind is not divided into two parts, those who are saved and those who are lost. The way of salvation by progress is open to all. All travel over it, stage by stage, life by life, all raise themselves towards peace and happiness, by work and by trials. All souls are capable of perfection and can acquire education. They are not equally advanced, but all will scale, sooner or later, the arduous heights which lead to the summit which is flooded with eternal light.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   . 

Many men close their minds to the idea of God; they refuse to see, to admit the eternal power which permeates the whole of nature.

The sun shines on the water, its quivering rays caress the sleeping waves. From on high it illumines the tranquil sea, and lights up millions of sparks on the crests of its waters. All beings moving in its depths can perceive the light, and, by a simple effort, rise from the gloomy abyss and bask in its rays. But if they refuse to quit their sombre abodes, if they rejoice in their darkness, that does not effect the light, which shines on nevertheless.

Thus it is with the great divine light. Without the thought of God, which illumines the depths of the Cosmos, without this imperishable light, all would remain in utter darkness. But this light appears in all its glory to those only who have rendered themselves worthy to understand it, whose senses have responded to the great voice of the infinite, to that breath which passes over the worlds, reviving all on its way.

God, in His pure essence, we are told by the spirits, is as an ocean of flame. God has no form, but He can make Himself visible to the higher spirits. That is the recompense accorded to great devotions, lives of sacrifice and of renouncement. There is then a kind of materialization, which is different from all that we can realize. But even under this aspect, the majesty of God is such that the purest spirits can scarcely bear the glory of it. Spirits arrived at perfection have the privilege of looking upon God unveiled; they declare that human language is too poor to give even the very faintest idea thereof.

God sees all, knows all, even the most secret thoughts. As the spirit is everywhere in the body, so God is everywhere in the universe, and in touch with all the elements of creation.

His love envelopes and connects all His creatures, calling them to life and to be the artisans of His eternal work. His solicitude extends to the humblest and most obscure, for all have come from Him. And all, even without a high intelligence and rained reasoning powers, can know and feel God by the powers of the heart.

God is the great universal soul, of which each soul is a ray, a spark. Each of us possesses, in a latent state, forces emanating from the divine forces; we must develop them by uniting ourselves closely with the Cause of which they are the effect. By the elevation of our thoughts towards God and by prayer, coming from the very depths of our being and binding the creature to the Creator, there is produced a constant penetration, a moral fecundation, a reviving of the riches hidden in us. But the human soul is ignorant of itself, and for want of knowledge and of will, it permits its inner powers to lie idle. Instead of dominating matter, it allows itself to be dominated by it; that is the reason of its trials, its ills and its weaknesses. That is why modern spiritualism comes to say to all: "Men, raise yourselves by thought above earthly things, raise yourselves high enough to understand that you are the children of God, high enough to feel that you are bound to Him, to His immense work, destined for a great object to which all others are secondary; and this object is the entrance into the great communion, the blessed harmony of beings and of worlds, which is only realized in God and through God."



¹ "And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever. Even the Spirit of Truth, whom thw world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knoweth Him, but ye know Him, for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you" )John XIV. 16, 17).
² See chapter IX.
³ See pp. 143, 146.

CHAPTER XI

RENOVATION

We believe that we have established in the preceding pages that modern spiritualism rests on universal testimony. It rests on experimental facts, observed in all parts of the globe by men of every kind, among whom we find scientists belonging to all the great universities and to several celebrated Academies. It is though them, and their efforts, that contemporary science, in spite of its doubts and repugnance, has been brought little by little to interest itself in the study of the invisible world.

Year by year, the number of experimenters has increased. Investigation has succeeded investigation, and the results have always confirmed previous conclusions. From these observations, multiplied infinitely, has come a certainty, that of the survival of the human being, and more precise ideas on the conditions of the future life.

By the attentive study of the phenomena, by the permanent communication established with the beyond, modern spiritualism has confirmed the great traditions of the past, the teachings of all religions, of all the high philosophies, touching the immortality of the soul and the existence of a great ruling Cause in the universe. What was formerly a hypothesis and a speculative line of thought, has now become a known fact. The future life is shown in all its striking reality; death has lost its terrifying aspect; heaven has come nearer to earth.

Spiritualism has done more than this. From the numerous investigations, from inquiries pursued during more than half a century, from all the facts, and all the revelations which proceed therefrom, it has constituted a new teaching, freed from all symbolism and obscurity, easily accessible even to the humblest, and which, for the erudite and the thinker, opens up vast perspectives of the higher grades of knowledge, and the conception of a superior ideal.

This teaching can give satisfaction to all, to the most refined as to the most uncultured, but it is especially addressed to those who suffer, who are bowed down under a heavy load or painful trials, to all those who need a living vivid faith to support them in their life, their work, their sufferings. It is especially addressed to the people. The masses have become incredulous and suspicious of all dogma, and religious belief, for they feel that they have been misled for centuries past. Nevertheless there exist always in them confused aspirations towards good, an innate desire for progress, liberty and light, which will help the new teaching and its regenerating action.

Modern spiritualism satisfies all those innate needs of the human soul, as no other doctrine has hitherto done. By the law of successive existences, it shows us justice ruling over the destiny of each. There are thus no more special privileges or exemptions, no more redemption by innocent blood, no more disinherited or favored ones.

All the spirits which people infinity, disseminated through space and the material worlds, are the creatures of their own works; all the souls which animate bodies of flesh, or are waiting for new reincarnations, are of the same origin, and destined to the same future. The merits, the acquired virtues, alone distinguish them, but all may rise by their own efforts and travel the path of infinite perfection. All family, subdivided into numerous sympathetic groups, and spiritual associations, of which the human family is but a reflection, a reduction, the members of which follow and assist each other through their many existences, living alternately the earth life and the free life of space, but always, sooner or later, coming together again.

Death thus loses the lugubrious, terrifying character which we have give it. It ceases to be the "king of terrors," but becomes rather a new birth, one of the conditions of the growth and development of life. All our existences are connected and form a whole. Death is only the passage from one to the other; for the sage, for the good man, it is the golden gate which opens into more beautiful regions.

When the prejudices which haunt our brains shall have faded away, man will understand the serene beauty and majesty of death. It is a mistake to think that it separates us from those dear to us. Thanks to spiritualism, we have the consolation of knowing that those who have preceded us in the beyond, watch over us and guide us in the dark ways of life. They are often at our side, invisible, ready to help us in our distress, to succor us in misfortune; and this knowledge gives us calmness and moral strength in time of trial. Their communications, their messages, soften for us the bitterness of the present, the sorrow of a separation which is only apparent. The teachings of the spirits develop our faculties and our knowledge. They tend to make us better, more confiding in the future and in the goodness of God.

Thus is realized and revealed to our eyes the law of fraternity and of solidarity which binds all men and of which humanity has already had an intuition. No more personal salvation, no more inexorable judgment which will fix the soul for ever far away from those who are dear to it, but instead, ever-possible reparation with the assistance of our brothers in space, the union of beings in their collective and eternal ascension.

This revelation gives us a new strength to resist the temptations and evil thoughts which assail us, and which we will avoid more carefully when we know that they cause grief to the members of our spiritual family, to our invisible friends.

In materialism, fraternity is but a word, altruism but a theory without foundation or meaning. Without faith in the future, man perforce devoted his whole attention to the present and to the enjoyments which it offers. In spite of all the exhortations of the theorists and the sophists, he felt little disposed to sacrifice himself, his interests, or his tastes, for the profit of a passing connection formed by ties contracted only yesterday, and which would be broken tomorrow. If death is the end of all things, he thought, why should I impose on myself privations for which I shall not be compensated? What is the good of virtue and of sacrifice, if all ends in nothing?

The inevitable result of such doctrines is the rapid development of selfishness, of the feverish search after riches, the care for exclusively material joys, the letting loose of passions, of violent appetites, of envy. All this is speedily produced. Under the action of this destructive breath, society is shaken to its foundations, and with it all the ideas of morality, of fraternity, of solidarity which the new spiritualism restores and strengthens.

"The belief in immortality," says Plato, "is the bond of every society; break this bond, and society falls to pieces."

In our time, leaning as we do to doubt, to negation, as a result of theological exaggerations, we are losing sight of this salutary idea. Experimental spiritualism gives us back our vanished faith, by placing it on a new and indestructible foundation.

The moral superiority of the doctrine of the spirits appears at every point. With it vanishes the iniquitous idea of the sin of one man borne by all. There is no more collective fall; all responsibilities are personal. Whatever be his condition in this world, be he born into suffering or misery and deprived of physical advantages and brilliant faculties, man knows that he is not experiencing an unmerited fate, but simply the result of his own previous actions. Therefore, wisdom counsels us to accept our fate without murmur, to fulfill our task faithfully, and to prepare ourselves for ever improving conditions.

Thanks to the doctrine of the spirits, man at last understands the object of life; he sees in it the means of education and reparation, he knows the greatness of the part he has to play; he ceases to curse fate and accuse God. He is delivered at one and the same time from the nightmares of annihilation and of hell, and from the illusion of an idle paradise.

The future is not one of useless and beatific contemplation, of the eternal immobility of the elect and the endless tortures of the damned. It is one of gradual evolution; it becomes after the course of trials and transformations, the circle of happiness, but always it is a life active and growing, the acquisition, by work, of an increasing amount of knowledge, of power and of morality; it is the progressive participation in the divine work, under the form of various missions, of devotion and of teaching, in the service of mankind.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   

Everyone recognizes today the necessity of a moral education, capable of regenerating society and of saving us from the decadence which threatens to end in ruin.

For long the idea prevailed that it sufficed to generalize instruction, but instruction without  moral teaching is powerless and sterile. First of all, we must make a man of the child, a man knowing his duty as well as his rights. It is not enough to develop intelligence, we must form the character, fortify the soul and the conscience. Knowledge must be supplemented by the light which reveals the future and the destiny of each. To make a new society, we need new and better men. Without that, all economic reforms, political combinations, and intellectual progress will be insufficient. The social order will only be as good as we are ourselves.

But this necessary education, on what is it to be based? It is not on negative theories, for they have been partly responsible for the ills of the present. It is not either on worn-out dogmas, on dead doctrines, on superficial beliefs which have no root in the soul.

No, mankind will accept no more symbols, legends, mysteries, veiled truths! It needs the full light, the splendid dawn of truth that the new spiritualism alone can offer him.

It alone can furnish a definite basis to morality and give to modern man the strength necessary to bear worthily his trials, to understand the causes of them, to react against them, to accomplish in all things his duty.

With the new spiritualism, man knows where he is going and his step becomes more firm, more assured. He knows that justice governs the world, that all is linked together, that each of his actions, good or bad, will weigh on him through time. In this thought, he finds strength to resist evil, and a powerful stimulant for good.

The spirit messages, the communion between the living and the dead have shown him the future beyond the tomb in all its living reality; he knows what fate awaits him, what responsibilities belong to him, what qualities he must acquire in order to be happy.

The study of spiritualism teaches us that life is a fight for the light; the struggle and the trial will only cease with the conquest of moral good. This thought fortifies the soul and prepares it for great works, for noble actions. Along with the sense of truth, it awakens in us confidence. Nourished by these principles, we fear neither adversity nor death. With a brave heart, we advance along fearless, without weakness or regret.

The elevating influence of spiritualism penetrates little by little into the most varied centers, from the most cultivated to the most obscure and degraded.

We have a proof of this in the following instance: In 1888, the convicts in the prison of Tarragona sent a most touching address to the International Spiritualist Congress, held at Barcelona, telling of the great moral help the knowledge of spiritualism had brought to them.

We find also in the working centers where spiritualism has spread, a very perceptible improvement in morals and habits, a firmer resistance to all excesses in general, and to anarchist theories in particular. Thanks to the counsels of the spirits, many vicious habits have been conquered, many troubled homes have become peaceful. Their teaching has awakened the lost faith, and with it, those virtues today become so rare.

It is a pleasant sight, for instance, to see, every Sunday, the crowds of spiritualist miners and their families who pour in from all surrounding points to Jumet (Belgium). They gather in a vast building, where, after the accustomed preliminaries, they listen with reverence to the teachings of their invisible guides, through the lips of the sleeping mediums. It is through one of them, a simple, uneducated working miner, who habitually speaks the Wallon patois, that the spirit of Canon Xavier Mouls, a priest of the greatest erudition and nobles character, manifest itself. It is to the Canon that the propagation of spiritualism and magnetism in the "corons" (or habitation of the Belgian miners) is due.

Mouls quitted this earth after having suffered cruel trials and bitter persecutions, but his spirit still watches over his beloved miners. Every Sunday he takes possession of the organs of speech of his favorite medium, and after a quotation from the scriptures, he, with priestly eloquence, discusses before them, for an hour, and in the purest French, the chosen subject, speaking to the hearts and intelligence of his listeners, exhorting them to do their duty, and to submit to the Divine laws. The impression produced on these people is very great, and it is the same wherever spiritualism is practiced in a serious manner by the lowly of the earth.

Sometimes, the spirits of miners known to those present, and how have shared their laborious existence, come and manifest themselves. They are easily recognizable by their language, their familiar expressions, by a thousand psychological details which are proofs of identity. They describe their mode of life in space, their sensations at the moment of death, the moral sufferings resulting from en evil past, from pernicious habits and tendencies to evil speaking and to intemperance, and these descriptions, full of animation and originality, exercise on the audience a great moral effect and produce a vivid and salutary impression, which brings about a distinct improvement in their ideas and habits.

In noting these facts, already very numerous, and daily increasing, we can realize how many unhappy souls have been comforted and benefited by spiritualism. It has saved many despairing ones from suicide, by proving to them the reality of survival, and giving back to them courage and the desire for life.

We certainly do not exaggerate in stating that many thousands of human beings belonging to different religions, Catholic and Protestant, and even the official representatives of those religions, who had been crushed and bruised by the trials of life and the death of their dear ones, deriving no help from their familiar doctrines, have found in the communion with the dead, in place of their vague faith, a firm conviction, an unshakable confidence in immortality.

This is what a Protestant clergyman wrote to Dr. A. Russel Wallace, the English scientist, after having discovered for himself the reality of the phenomena of spiritualism: - "Death appears to me now quite different from what it did in the past; after having suffered from deep depression due to the death of my sons, I am now full of confidence and joy; I am another man."1 Against these testimonials, so eloquent in their simplicity, there my be objected, it is true, the frauds, the trickery, the charlatanry and mercenary mediumship, in a word, all the abuses arising in certain cases from a wrong practice of experimental spiritualism, of which we have before spoken.

Those who indulge in these practices prove thereby their utter ignorance of spiritualism. If they knew its precepts and its laws, they would understand what a future they are preparing for themselves by acts which are so many profanations. They would realize the risk they run in making of an honorable and sacred rite, which should be approached only in the purest spirit, a means of vulgar gain, of shameless barter.

We shall also be reminded of the influence of evil spirits, the apocryphal communications signed by famous names, and cases of obsession and possession. But these influences have been exercised, these facts have occurred in all ages; men have always been exposed (often without knowing the causes) to the acts of invisibles of an inferior order, and the study of spiritualism comes precisely to furnish us with the means of escaping these influences, of working on the mischievous and evil spirits, and bringing them back to good, by evocation, by prayer, and by teaching.

The beneficent action of spiritualism is not confined to man, it extends to the inhabitants of space. By means of the relations established between the two worlds, enlightened adepts can influence the lower spirits, and by words o consolation and of pity, by wise counsels, redeem them from evil, hatred and despair.

And this is an imperative duty, the duty of every superior being towards his inferior brethren, whether they belong to one world or the other, it is the duty of the man elevated by spiritualism to the dignity of an educator and guide to perverse and backward spirits, sent to him to be helped and ameliorated. At the same time it is the surest way to purify the fluidic approaches to the earth.

It is with this object that every spiritualistic circle of any importance consecrates part of its séances to the instruction and the reformation of guilty souls; and by the interest shown in them, by kindly advice and especially by fervent prayer which brings down on them magnetic influences, the most hardened spirits are frequently brought back to better sentiments, and discontinue the painful obsessions they had been practicing on their victims.

By its erroneous conception of life beyond the tomb, by its doctrine of eternal damnation, the Church has long prevented the accomplishment of this duty. She forbids all communication between men and spirits, and sets a gulf between them. All those who on quitting the earth were considered as damned for their sins, could not look to man for moral help, consolation or prayer. The door was shut.

They met with the same difficulty from the other side, for exalted spirits, from the subtle nature of their envelope, by their ethereal fluids, out of harmony with those of the lower spirits, found more difficulty than men in communicating with them. All the poor wandering souls, torn by anguish, assailed by painful memories of the past, were abandoned to their own devices, without a friendly thought, or ray of sunshine to illumine their darkness. Generally imbued with inveterate prejudices, often convinced, through their mistaken education, of the reality of the eternal torments to which they imagined themselves to be condemned. These horrible ideas of their position often awakened thoughts of rage and fury, and a desire for vengeance which they attempted to satisfy on weak or sinfully inclined men.

The evil influence of these spirits was increased by the solitude in which they were left. Held down by their gross fluids in the atmosphere of the earth, in permanent contact with men, accessible to their influence, and able to exert their own on them, they soon had only one object in view, that of forcing men to share the torments they imagined themselves to be enduring.

That is why, during the Middle Ages, when all relations with the invisible were forbidden, considered culpable and punished by fire, cases of obsession and of possession were constantly on the increase, and the bad influences of evil spirits spread rapidly. In place of endeavoring to convert them by prayer and kindly exhortations, the Church had only anathema and maledictions for them; she used exorcisms, which are worse than useless, for their only result is to irritate the evil spirits, to provoke them to cynical and impious replies and increase the indecent and odious actions they suggested to their victims.

In losing sight of the pure Christian traditions, in stifling the voice of the invisible world by threats of tortures and the stake, the Church has denied the great law of solidarity which unites all God's creatures, and imposes on the more advanced the obligation to work for the instruction and improvement of their brethren. During many centuries she deprived men of the help, the light, the inestimable benefits following on communication with the higher spirits. She deprived them of the loving intercourse with the dear ones who have preceded us to the beyond, an intercourse which is the joy, the supreme consolation of the afflicted, the lonely ones of this earth, of all those who suffer the anguish of separation.

She has deprived mankind of that flood of spiritual life which descends from space, strengthens the soul, and upraises the sad and despairing heart.

Thus darkness settled little by little over men's souls, the most glorious truths became veiled, and odious or childish conceptions grew up. Doubt spread, and the spirit of skepticism and of negation pervaded the world.

The Church, by the mouth of its most accredited theologians, thought herself justified in asserting that no sentiment of pity or of charity remained in the hearts of believers or of the blessed, towards those who had been their relations, their companions, those near and dear to them in this world.

"The elect, in heaven, preserve no feeling of friendship or love for the damned; they have no compassion for them and even enjoy the spectacle of the tortures endured by their friends and relations. They enjoy them, in the knowledge that they themselves are exempt from suffering; and on the other hand, all compassion is dead in them, on account of the admiration they feel for the divine justice." ("Somme Théologique" of St Thomas Aquinas, supp. to 3rd part, quest. 95, art. 1 and 2, edition of Lyons 1685.)

This is also the opinion of St Bernard, in his treatise "De diligendo Deo," chap. XV. - "These consequences are therefore drawn by certain mystical authors. To attain here below to a perfect life, one must keep no criminal attachment; if then a father, a mother, a husband or a wife, should die a criminal, or in a state of moral sin, one must tear out of one's heart all remembrance of them, since they are everlastingly hated of God, and one may not love them without impiety."

Monstrous doctrine, destructive of all family feeling, and how different from the teachings of spiritualism which strengthen family ties by showing us the bonds which connect its members, preexisting and persisting in the life of space. No soul is hated of God. God, who is infinite Love, cannot hate. The guilty soul expiates, and works out its salvation, sooner or later, by the help of its more enlightened brethren.

Spiritualism re-establishes this communion of souls which is a source of strength and of light. By showing us life under its true aspect, where evil spirits are but wandering spirits, capable of a return to good, by giving us the means of influencing them, of improving their condition, and aiding in their progress, spiritualism puts an end to a deplorable antagonism, it renders impossible any return of the scenes of possession of which the past is so full. It inspires man with the only right attitude towards the higher spirits, his guides and masters, and towards the inferior spirits, his brethren.

We see thus, in space and on earth, spiritualism exercising its beneficent influence.

Man, say the spirit voices, learn to know yourself, to understand the laws governing the world and society. You speak ever of your rights; know that you have no rights other than those acquired by your own moral value, your degree of advancement. Do not covet riches, they bring great obligations and heavy responsibilities in their train. Do not seek an idle and luxurious life; work and simplicity are the best instruments for your progress, and your future happiness. Know that all is ordained with equity, that nothing is left to chance. The position of man here below is that which he has made for himself. Bear therefore with patience these necessary evils, chosen by yourself. Pain is a means of elevation; the suffering of the present expiates bygone faults and paves the way to future bliss. Your earthly existence is but a page of the great book of life, a short passage which connects two immensities, the past and the future. The globe which you inhabit is only an atom in space, an inferior sojourning place, a place of education, of preparation for higher lives. Do not therefore judge the divine plan by the narrow views of the present. Eternal justice is not the justice of man. Trust yourself to the supreme Wisdom, fulfill the part assigned to you, and which you chose before your birth. Work with courage to ameliorate your lot and that of your brethren. The harder your task, the more rapid your progress. Fortune and pleasure are but drawbacks to him who wishes to rise. You can carry away with neither houses nor riches, but only the qualities you have acquired; those are the imperishable riches of which death cannot deprive you. Ask help of your invisible guides, who will not fail you. Love all men; practice charity and justice towards all. Remember that you form but one large family, proceeding from God. The only happiness, the only harmony here below is by union with our fellow men, union of thought and of heart.

We often hear this question: Is modern spiritualism a science or a religion?

Until today, the paths followed by the human mind in its search for truth have led to opposite results, an evident sign of the inferiority of thought, confined and limited in its sphere of action. But a day must come, and soon, when man will enter a region where these two forms of ideas will unite and amalgamate.

Modern spiritualism is the ground on which this meeting will take place. No other doctrine can furnish mankind with the all-embracing conception which reaches from the depths of lowest life to the summit of creation, to God, and links all created beings in an endless chain.

When this idea has thoroughly penetrated the mind and soul and become the principle of education, it will no longer be possible to separate science and religion, and still less to combat one by the other; for science, hitherto confined in the circle of earthly life and of the material world, will have recognized the invisible and lifted the veil which coves the fluidic life; she will have sounded the beyond, to discover the forms and laws thereof. And the future life, the ascension of souls through all its numberless abodes, will be no more a hypothesis, an unproven speculation, but a living truth.

It will no longer be possible to combat religion in the name of science, for religion will cease to be the narrow exclusive dogma, the material worship which we have known. It will be the crowning point of all the conquests and all the aspirations of the human mind; the flight of thought based on conviction, on the knowledge of the invisible world and of its laws.

Then each one will understand that science and religion are but words, used to express the inferior states of human conceptions, the groping of thought in its earliest endeavors, the transitory state of the spirit in its evolution towards the truth. The state expressed by these words will have disappeared with the shadows of ignorance and superstition, to give place to knowledge, the real knowledge of the soul and its future, of the universe and its laws, and with this knowledge will come light and strength, which will enable the soul at last to take its proper place and play its true part in the work of creation.

Science has always gloried in her conquests, and her pride is legitimate. Nevertheless, human science is provisional, incomplete and changeable. It is but the accumulation of the ideas of one century which the science of the next surpasses and submerges. In spite of their blind negations, and their narrow obstinacy, the views of scientists are each day disproved on some point. Laboriously erected theories collapse to make room for others. Throughout the ages, thought advances, but in its march, how many hesitations, periods of eclipse, and even backward movements there are!

It is in consequence of the routine and prejudices of science that certain writers have vehemently attacked her, and accused her of powerlessness and sterility. Such accusations are unjust. As we have shown, bankruptcy has only attained the materialistic and positive systems. On the other hand, theology, by driving the mind towards mysticism, has evoked an inevitable reaction.

Mysticism and materialism have had their day. The future belongs to the new science, the psychic science which studies all phenomena and seeks for their causes, which recognizes the invisible world, and realizes a magnificent synthesis of life and of the universe, to spread the knowledge thereof throughout humanity.

The idea of the supernatural will be destroyed, but all the unexplored dominions of nature, filled as they are with inexhaustible riches, will be opened to human research.

It is under the influence of modern spiritualism that this scientific evolution is now being produced. In spite of all assertions to the contrary, the new science owes its existence to this alone, for without the impulse given by it to human thought, this science would still be in the future.

Spiritualism brings to each science the elements of a veritable renovation. Through the knowledge of these phenomena, it leads physical science to the discovery of the subtle form of matter. It illumines all the problems of physiology by the knowledge of the fluidic body, without which it was impossible to explain the grouping, in the organic form, and on a determined plan, of the innumerable molecules which constitute our earthly body, as well as the preservation of the individuality and of memory, through the constant changes of the human body.

Thanks to this knowledge psychology is no longer checked by so many obscure questions, and especially by that of the multiple personalities, each unknown to the other, which succeed each other in the same individual. Spiritualistic experiments furnish to pathology the means of curing obsessions and possessions, and the innumerable cases of madness and hallucination connected with them. The practice of magnetism, the utilization of the curative fluids, revolutionize and transform therapeutics.
   
Lastly, modern spiritualism enables us better to understand the evolution of life, by showing us its principle in the psychical progress of the being, himself constructing and perfecting his form throughout the ages.

This evolution, showing us our lives as simple stages of the long ascending journey through the worlds, confirms the views of the astronomers, who tell us of the small importance of our planet in the scheme of the universe, and favors the inhabitability of the other worlds of space.

It is thus that spiritualism enriches and vitalizes the most diverse realms of thought and of science, hitherto limited to the study of the visible and inferior world of matter. Spiritualism, by proving the existence of the fluidic world which is the prolongation, the complement of the first, opens up limitless horizons. And as these two worlds are connected and react constantly one on the other, the knowledge of one is incomplete without that of the other. Spiritualism, by bringing them nearer, by uniting them, will render possible the explanation of the phenomena of life and the solution of the many problems before which science has hitherto been powerless and dumb.

This renovating action which experimental spiritualism exercises on science will also make itself felt on religion, but more slowly and less easily. Of all human institutions, the religious are the most refractory to all reform, all forward movement, nevertheless, in common with all things, they are subject to the divine law of progress.

In the higher plan of evolution, every symbol, every religious form must give place to higher and purer ones. Christianity cannot disappear, for its principles contain the vital germs; but it must cast off the diverse forms which it has taken on in the course of ages and regenerate itself at the fountain of the new revelation, rest itself on the science of facts and become once more a living faith.

No religious ideal, no form of worship is unchangeable. A day will come when the present dogmas and forms will go to join the fragments of the antique worships, but the religious ideal will not perish; the precepts of the Gospels will always rule the conscience, just as the grand figure of the Crucified One will endure throughout the ages.

In a certain measure, the beliefs, the various religions, taken in their successive order, may be considered as the steps by which thought climbs, in its upward course, towards the greater conceptions of a future life and a divine ideal. From this point of view they would have their use, but there always comes a time when the most perfect becomes insufficient, a time when the human mind rises beyond the circle of its usual beliefs, to seek a more complete form of knowledge.

It then sees the fundamental principles which are common to all imperishable truths, whereas all the rest, symbols, forms, rites, are so many passing accidents in the history of humanity.

Its attention becomes detached from these forms and expressions, and turns towards the future. There it sees, towering above all Churches, above all exclusive religions, a vaster religion, which will embrace all creeds, which will have neither rites, nor dogmas, nor barriers, but will testify to the universal facts and truths; A Church which, above all sects and Churches, will extend its mighty arms in protection and in blessing. It will see a temple in which the whole of mankind will reverently unite its thoughts and beliefs in one only confession of love and faith, which will declare itself in these words: Our Father which art in heaven!

Such will be the religion of the future, the universal religion. It will not be a close corporation, an orthodoxy governed by narrow rules, but a fusion of spirits and of hearts.

Modern spiritualism, by the stirring up of ideas which it provokes, prepares its coming. Its growing action shakes the Churches out of their present apathy and forces them to turn towards the light which is rising above the horizon.

It is true that before this light, before the depths which it illumines, many souls attached to the past still tremble and become dizzy. They fear for their faith, for their old and shaken ideals; this brilliant light dazzles them. Is it not Satan, they say, who thus flashes before the eyes of men a deluding mirage? Is not this the work of the spirit of evil?

Be comforted, fearful souls, there is no spirit of evil but ignorance. This ray of light is an appeal from God - God who wishes to call you nearer to Him, that you should leave the dark regions to enter the luminous spheres.

The Christian churches need not be alarmed by this movement. The new revelation comes not to destroy, but to enlighten, to regenerate them. If they will understand and accept it, they will find in it an unexpected help against the materialism which is ceaselessly breaking down their defenses; they will find in it a new power of life.

Have you seen those grottoes ornamented with stalactites and white crystals, and the subterranean galleries of diamond mines? All their riches are buried in darkness. Nothing betrays their hidden splendors. But the light penetrates, and instantly all is illuminated; the crystals and the precious metals glitter, the vaults and walls reflect the dazzling fires.

This light, the new spiritualism brings to the Churches. Under its rays all the hidden riches of the Gospels, the jewels of the secret doctrines of Christianity buried under the mass of dogmas, the veiled truths emerge from the night of ages and appear in their full splendor. That is what the new revelation offers to the religions. It is a succor from heaven, a resurrection of the dead and forgotten things contained in them. It is a new flowing of the Master's thought embellished, enriched, brought to light by the help of the Celestial Spirits.

Will the Churches understand this? Will they feel the power of the truth which manifests itself, and the greatness of the part they may yet plat, if they can understand and assimilate it? We do not know. But it would be in vain that they would try to combat it, to stop its progress. "This is the will of God," say the voices of space, "and those who lift themselves against it will be broken and dispersed." No human force, no dogma, no persecution, can stop the new dispensation, the necessary complement to the teaching of Christ, announced and directed by Him.

It has been said: "And it shall come to pass, in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams."

This time has come. The physical evolution and the intellectual development of mankind have reached a point where they can furnish instruments sufficiently supple and refined for the higher spirits to use as vehicles for their manifestations and means of spreading their teachings. That is the sens of these words.

The powers of space are at work and everywhere their influence is felt. But what are these powers, you will ask?

Members and representatives of the churches of this world, hear and engrave it on your memories.

Above the earth, in the vast fields of space, there lives, thinks, and acts, an Invisible Church, which watches over mankind.

It is composed of the Apostles, the disciples of Christ, and of all the wise men of Christian times, but with them you would find also the high spirits of every race, of all religions, all the great souls who have lived in this world according to the law of love and charity.

For the judgments of heaven are not as the judgments of earth. In the ethereal spaces, the souls of men are not asked for an account of their race or their religion, but of their deeds and of the good they have done.

That is the universal Church; it is not limited as are the conventional churches of this world; it is a union of the spirits of all those who have suffered for the truth.

Its decisions, inspired by God, rule the world. It directs the advance of modern spiritualism and helps its development. The spirits which compose it fight and work for it, some from space, by influencing its defenders (for there exists no distance for spirits, whose thoughts vibrate through infinity), others by coming down to earth, and sometimes by clothing themselves in a body of flesh, by being born again among men to fulfill once more the role of divine missionaries. God holds in reserve other hidden forces, other choice souls for the hour of need.

The earth will see dark days, days of grief and mourning, the tempest will burst. Violently will the fogs of ignorance and the mists of corruption be dispersed.

The tempest will pass; the blue sky will reappear. The divine work will receive a new impulse. Faith will be reborn in the souls of men, and the Christ-thought will shine once more over a regenerated world.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

To resume, modern spiritualism is neither a science nor a religion. Science and religion are two separate and distinct forms of revelation. Spiritualism is the revelation in its most complete sense, the revelation of the universe in all its magnificence, under its double aspect, visible and invisible, the revelation of the eternal and divine laws which now appear to us in their majesty, directing the worlds through space, presiding over the evolutions of life, introducing everywhere order and harmony.

The new spiritualism is the study of man, not in his passing form, but in his spirit, in his imperishable ego; it is the law of progress affirmed and explained.

It is a doctrine of life, of truth and of light; its moral resources, its means of consolation are infinite. It is a gift of God, a manifestation of His thought. It rests on the science of facts, and extends a hand to true religion, to pure Christianity, to the eternal religion of love, upraising and regenerating it.

Science and religion have hitherto lived in different realms. Today, they can no more remain thus divided, everything tends to bring them together, to reinforce one by the other.

An entirely new era of thought is inaugurated. It is time to pass from the reign of legend, miracle, and blind faith to that of reason, enlightened belief, science, and law. Mankind must at last be delivered from narrow systems and rigid routines, to participate in a great, an infinite life.

The work is a grand and mighty one. Spiritualism calls on all intelligences, on all generous minds, to join in it. The field of action is without limit. Scientists, thinkers, artists, poets, all those who are interested in profound science, ideal beauty, and divine harmony, will find therein a source of inexhaustible inspiration.

Spiritualism is the bond which unites the two worlds and the two humanities, for the world of spirits is one with the world of mortals. By birth and death they are continually interchanging. Spirits are only men divested of their earthly envelopes; they are interested and participate in all that goes on amongst us, all the commotions which disturb our world react on them. From this comes a close union and the necessity of mutual relations, by which the forces of the visible world, combined with those of the invisible, will effect the universal harmony. In this way an intimate communion between earth and space, between the spiritual world, celestial and eternal, and the material and perishable world, the world of mortals, will be established.


¹ "Miracles and Modern Spiritualism." A. Russel Wallace.


CONCLUSION

THE observation of spirit phenomena on the one hand, and the teaching of the spirits on the other, have unveiled to us the profound truths which form the basis of primitive Christianity and of all the great religious of the past. Light has been thrown on those events in the life of Christ which have hitherto been mysterious to us. At the same time, the thought, the idea of Jesus has been revealed in its entirety, the greatness of His work has appeared to us.

Jesus was not a founder of dogmas, a creator of symbols; He was the initiator of the world to the religion of love. Some have based belief on the idea of justice. Justice does not suffice; charity is required, love for men, patience, gentleness, simplicity. It is through this that Christianity is superior and imperishable, and all those who love mankind may call themselves Christian, even those who separate themselves from the traditions of the Churches.

The religion of Jesus is not exclusive. It unites all believing souls by one common bond, all those who think, feel, love, and suffer, in one great communion of love. It is a simple and sublime form which goes straight to the heart. It is and ideal of fraternity and love, which has required nineteen centuries to be understood, to penetrate the human conscience.

By affirming the right of every one to enter into the kingdom of God, that is to say, into truth and light, Jesus prepared the regeneration of mankind and smoothed the way for the future revelation.

The Christ did even more. By the manifestations of which He was the center and which continued after His death, He brought nearer together the two humanities, the visible and the invisible. The Church separated them anew, she broke the chain which united the dead to the living. The thought of Jesus became veiled; shadow brooded over the world, that heavy shadow of the Middle Ages, whose influence still weighs on us.

But, after centuries of comparative silence, the invisible world opens once more, and is lighted to its very depths. Christ and His legions are at work. The hour of the new dispensation has come.

This dispensation is modern spiritualism. It comes with its treasures of discoveries, with the multitude of its testimonies, with the teachings of its spirits. The columns of the temple it rears to thought are rising ever higher and higher. Thirty years ago it was but an insignificant structure. Behold it now! It is a great moral edifice under whose roof thousands of souls have found an asylum from the storms of life. The eyes of those who suffer and struggle are turned towards it. All those to whom life is a heaven burden, who are assailed by dark fears and for whom despair lies in wait, will find in it help and comfort. Under its influence they will learn to fight with courage, to defy death, to conquer a better future.

The thinkers, the noble spirits who work for mankind, will find therein the means of realizing their ideal of peace and harmony. For it is only a powerful faith, a firm belief, knitting together the souls of men, which can lead to universal harmony.

Already we can see that it is modern spiritualism which will realize this ideal. It has done more towards it in fifty years than Catholicism in many centuries. At the present moment, it has spread to all quarters of the globe. Its adepts, whose number is countless, salute each other by the name of brother. A large and ever-growing literature, hundreds of papers and reviews, of groups, of federations, show its abundant vitality.

Strong in its far-distant past, which is that of humanity itself, and sure of its future, spiritualism rears itself boldly before doctrines without foundation, ans wavering skepticism. It advances resolutely along the way open before it, in spite of obstacles and interested opposition, certain of its final triumph, for it has on its side science and truth.

    .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  

Let us say in conclusion, that modern spiritualism does not offer us a new system to be added to other systems, nor an assembly of vain theories. It brings us the real secret of our elevation and regeneration. It is a solemn act of the drama of human evolution which is commencing; it is a revelation which illumines at once the past and the future, which brings out of the dust of ages sleeping beliefs, animates them with a new flame, and gives them new life by completing them.

It is a powerful breath which descends from space and passes over the world; under its action all the great truths stand revealed. Majestic, they emerge from the obscurity of the ages to play the part assigned to them by the divine thought. These great things are strengthened in the abodes of silence. In the apparent forgetfulness of the centuries, they have been drawing in renewed energies and have prepared themselves for the great tasks of the future. Above the ruins of temples, of extinct civilizations, and fallen empires, above the ebb and flow of the human tides, a great voice is raised, and this voice cries: The time has come, the time has come!

From out the starry heights, legions of Spirits descend on earth to fight the fight of light against darkness. It is not man, it is not the sages or the philosophers, who bring a new doctrine. It is the spirits of space who come among us and whisper to our thoughts the teachings which are to regenerate the world. They are the spirits of God! All those who possess the gift of clairvoyance see them, hovering over us, assisting in our work, fighting at our side for the redemption and ascension of the human soul.

Great things are preparing. Let the thought-workers arise, if they would participate in the mission which God offers to all those who love and serve the truth.